Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just written to Westrock to see if they can give us an update. I'm not holding my breath - probably get fobbed off with the usual "in the next month".


It would be nice if the Council would follow these up, but they don't seem bothered.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

After no reply from Westrock, I tried contacting Morrisons. After a bit of nudging, I got this reply today:


"Estates have told me that due to the sale of our M Locals, we terminated the agreement on this site, so no longer have anything to do with it. I can only suggest you try contacting Westrock again to see if you can get any information.


I'm sorry but there is nothing further I can do."


So that's confirmed what we already expected - that Morrisons no longer have an interest. Looks like Westrock still do. I don't expect that they sold this interest when they sold the stores (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34198944). Presumably they just reliquished their interest.

  • 4 months later...
Any update on this? I feel like we've all been 'sold a pup' here. It would be nice to at least push back those hoardings, so during peak commuting times people aren't bumping into each other trying to catch a train/bus on a restricted amount of pavement. Plus as Chazzle mentions they look awful - at least some street art on them would be an improvement.
  • 1 month later...

Bit of an update, but not very promising:


I tried to contact the current developer Westrock and an apparent investor NorthRidge Capital (http://www.northridgecapital.co.uk/portfolio.php?p=east_dulwich). Both completely ignored my emails. I contacted Morrisons who confirmed they no longer have an interest (see above).


In the end, I wrote to Helen Hayes MP, who wrote to the Director of Planning at Southwark in January. That did get a prompt response. The response basically said:

1. The three-year time limit has run out, but the developer could claim they've started because of the demolition.

2. The developer has applied for a minor adjustment to the plans which suggests they are going to get moving again.

3. The hoardings are on private land, but he would get the Highways Licensing team to check

4. He would ask the Head of Building Control to check whether the partially demolished former waiting room presented any hazard to the public.


I left this sitting until recently (also focusing on getting the appeal on demolishing 1 & 2 Railway Rise rejected), but then wrote back on 21 April.


In short, I said:

a) I thought the partial demolition meant that any time limit on planning permission was pretty meaningless.

b) Were the developers trying to renege on the library promise?

c) The hoardings are blocking the route for people leaving the station and trying to cross.

d) Had the Head of Building Control checked the safety of the partially demolished structure?

e) Would it not be reasonable for the Council to contact the developers and find out about their intentions.


I'll let you know more when I get a response to my follow.


This has now been dragging on for ten years, and counting ...

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

There's been a digger in there since Monday, as far as I have been able to see. They're clearing all the piles of soil and rubble and levelling the ground.


A dump truck was picking up a load of soil as I happened to walk by on the way to Sainbury's, so I stopped and asked if they were preparing to build, and the site guy said yes.


But when I asked him when they intended to begin, he said he didn't know.


So, at least they're clearing and levelling the site, which means that we might be able to use it for something else while the developer is faffing.

rch Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I

> stopped and asked if they were preparing to build,

> and the site guy said yes.

>



"site guy"? you seem to indicate you spoke to an american male there.


i understand that JD Wetherspoon have bought the site. I only recently discovered the existence of the one tucked away opposite Denmark Hill station so this will be welcome news for anyone around Lordship Lane who fancies a few affordable beers on a night out.

Sorry, I'm a dual US/UK national and tend to slip into bi-lingual communication when my brain isn't functioning (getting the flu).


I'm not sure if he was the site manager, but he seemed to be telling the lorry drivers what to do, but didn't want to communicate very intimately with a passer-by.


The site has planning permission for ugly flats, so I can't see them building a pub there... unless they put a pub on the ground floor where the Morrisons was going to be?


I just hope they don't try to back out of building the library...

I annoyed a lot of people by voting against this development when I sat on the planning committee, on the grounds that it was overdevelopment and terrible design, not in keeping with the area.


The development got approved because the community asset value of the Library on the ground floor was thought to compensate.


I wasn't the least bit surprised when a later amendment was submitted and approved to cite the Library in the back of the development, with a retail outlet positioned in the front.


I'd heard that more amendments had been submitted to save money by making the building design even worse, but I've lost track now that I'm not a cllr anymore... is the Library completely gone now??

sidebirds Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rch Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I

> > stopped and asked if they were preparing to

> build,

> > and the site guy said yes.

> >

>

>

> "site guy"? you seem to indicate you spoke to an

> american male there.

>

> i understand that JD Wetherspoon have bought the

> site. I only recently discovered the existence of

> the one tucked away opposite Denmark Hill station

> so this will be welcome news for anyone around

> Lordship Lane who fancies a few affordable beers

> on a night out.


Sidebirds - if you want to have cheap drinks in an amazing place, get on the bus to Forest Hill and go to the Capitol. It's a Wetherspoon's ( and therefore for those who are not boycotting JDW establishments for their boss's Brexiteering) in an old 1920s/30s picture palace. Fantastic interior, though it still smells unmistakably of Wetherspoon's - smelly food and stale beer, all worked into an old carpet for a decade or so until ripe. Apparently JDW are going to be selling it so make the most of it while you can.


BigED

Apparently the building's about to start. The hoarding will be extended further across Railway Rise, which will make it tight for lorries to get up there. There will be a new site entrance near the corner - which should be ... interesting.


The same source said it will be a library and M&S, but he's not been 100% reliable in the past! I haven't seen any application to change usage to a pub or bar.

Sidebirds - if you want to have cheap drinks in an

> amazing place, get on the bus to Forest Hill and

> go to the Capitol. It's a Wetherspoon's ( and

> therefore for those who are not boycotting JDW

> establishments for their boss's Brexiteering) in

> an old 1920s/30s picture palace. Fantastic

> interior, though it still smells unmistakably of

> Wetherspoon's - smelly food and stale beer, all

> worked into an old carpet for a decade or so until

> ripe. Apparently JDW are going to be selling it

> so make the most of it while you can.

>

> BigED



Thanks for the recommendation. Haven't heard of this spot, interior makes it sound well worth a visit, not to mention as an anti-globalist and a democrat I am all for JD Wetherspoon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...