Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Me and Mrs SCSB79 along with our neighbours just popped along to the wee garden centre doing the Christmas trees... the nicest chaps in the world selling them. Allowed us to take the tree and come back with cash later as we didn't think they wouldn't take cards... also offer free local delivery.


Good quality trees too.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4705-christmas-trees-on-uplands-road/
Share on other sites

Happily I went to B&Q Old Kent Rd this afternoon and got a super Norway Spruce tree for ?9. Yes ?9. It is 6 ft high and smells amazing. I have bought similar trees in ED the last few years for ?35+ and they haven't smelt of pine AT ALL.

I wasn't the only person from this area snapping up one of these trees either. We all lamented the fact that the street sellers in ED were selling quite expensive trees.


Michael Palaeologus you are quite right, I saw TINY trees in Northcross Rd fort ?25. They were so small.


My tree is well worth the ?9 paid. It looks great up.

May I respectfully direct evryone on here to Bar Mitzvah?

It appears you all have exactly the right sort of 'inclination' towards Christmas.

I'll make sure the punch bowl is refilled and that there are comestibles.

Really, come on. It's just on The Lounge.

So why wouldn't you?

The two gents at PlantNation on Uplands are brilliant and two of the nicest funniest men I have met. I tip my hat to them.


But there is already a thread about this in recommendations here.


And if you can all shop with funny cloth bags then you can all by an artificial tree and help save the planet?!


Right on man.

Our artifial Xmas tree is now on it's fifth year, and it's still going as strong as when we bought it!


It cost an outrageous 100 quid when we first bought it, but now it's down to 20 quid a year and shrinking. It looks as good as when we first bought it - and most visitors think it's real. We bought it at the Xmas shop in Hays Galleria. I don't know if that's still going?


However, there was an extensive debate that suggested that a 10 year life artificial tree was more environmentally friendly than cut and dispose ones when we bought it. Unhappily, whilst the debate is still there, most have agreed that cut and dispose is probably slightly better. (You have to consider transport, distribution as well as loss of land to monoculture to get the idea).

Got a big tree from Pretty Traditional yesterday - ?40. Not entirely sure it is going to fit but I wanted one that had a lot of foliage high up.


When it is finished with I usually cut it up and put it on the fire in the living room. In fact I am just drying out the trunk of last years to put on now.

Please someone tell me this isn't true ....


I was passing the EDT on the top of a bus yesterday, and thought I saw outside amongst the bigger trees spindly little trees about 30cm high - and with about three tiny branches each - in pots with a sign saying ?10. I think they were on a table.


?10????


Did I see that right???


Are people in ED really paying ?10 for something that small?


Should I be surprised?

My family was in this game for a fair few years..


To be fair to both the sellers outside the EDT and to Sainsburys, potted trees with roots are always going to be more expensive. Quite a lot of labour goes into planting and tending to these trees during the year or two before it is sold to the public. you then have to add on storage costs and finally transport, and not forgetting of course a margin for some profit. It soon adds up.


In terms of impact on the environment, as Huguenot correctly states, the argument between the benefits of plastic or real trees continues. On the side of opting for a real one, I understand that a young tree will take almost three times more carbon out of the atmosphere than an older, more established tree. Christmas trees are all specifically grown for this purpose, if people didnt buy real trees they would not have been grown in the first place. The story of thousands of acres of forest being cleared each year is a myth, they all come from fields around Europe and are treated in the same way as any other crop.


I suspect the cheaper trees at B&Q are the traditional Norway spruce trees. The 'Nordman' variety generally sold on the Lane take a lot longer to grow and will therefore always be more expensive. Lizzied is right in that Nordman trees will never smell as nice as the traditional pine, but they do drop less needles and are not as sharp as the traditional tree.


The guys on Uplands Road are the friendliest garden centre people I have come across, if I was at home for Christmas then they would be getting my money.

you can get organic ones in that smart grocers consort road. organic xmas trees? wow. get me some a dem.

sign says "organic xmas trees". must be pricey.

not understanding much about all this but, isnt growing the real trees good for the enviroment? surely they pump out the oxygen. plastic must = bad no? not everyone burns the trees when used. they get chipped up and reused.

Yes, I think so woodie.


However, they are a cash crop that need cultivating and transporting, and monoculture itself is regarded as damaging the environment. When the tree is disposed of all the carbon goes back into the environment, so the tree itself is carbon neutral.


The consensus is that it becomes quite a close call when an artificial one is only replaced once every 10-15 years, but natural trees need to cultivated and transported every year afresh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...