Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I didn't know the drug testing situation in pro-boxing was SO dire.

Mayweather will know this (that it's so dire, NOT that I didn't know about it !).


Previously I thought Mayweather was just being an @ss with Manny Pac, but in my mind now he has a bit more slack for this kind of 'game' because it is concievable that he knows of something (or has heard) which causes him concern.


I cut even more slack for Mayweather v Mosley because Mosley has already been caught for something.


Maybe this is a new path that the higher-ranked bouts will take if there really IS suspicions about who is or is not doping ? And if so, maybe it paves the way for a coherent and enforceable procedure in the pro ranks.

Yeah it looks like Hopkins is the man in this contest, he's old yes but he's way up the LHW rankings and bizzarely still performing amazingly. I just hope it's a clean fight. I'd prefer to see Alan Green and Hopkins, but I understand it's about the money.

I'm fairly certain that Hopkins will win this one with ease.


The thing that made Jones an outstanding fighter was his speed and reflexes. I've never seen a faster jab in my life I don't think. Because of these two qualities, his mistakes or lack of regard for boxing's rudiments went unpunished for a long time. Notwithstanding the fact that he was also an exceptional boxer, this is why he was so brilliant and also why he has declined so dramatically.


Hopkins' success was never predicated on speed. He is a pretty tidy boxer himself obviously, but most of all he dug in. He used his skills and the stuff they DON'T teach you in the amateurs, i.e. how to negate opponents, how to tie them up, how to limit them, how to steal rests whilst wearing the other guy down - and also the stuff he probably learned in jail, i.e. how to break a man's spirit, how to intimidate, how to break someone down into bits so that even they do not know quite how they'll fit together again. He's also not adverse to a couple of nasty shots or headbutts now and again. In short, he's tough and savvy.


He can still do all of that for 12 rounds against Jones. Maybe not someone like Calzaghe where he faded, but I can see him serving up a spiteful, nasty and career ending beating to Jones.


In fact, spiteful is the word I would most regularly use to describe Hopkins as a fighter and apparently as a person.

Yep, I would be very surprised if Jones managed to pull off a decent performance. (OK so he looked good against Lacy recently... but Lacy is pretty poor and was never a deserving champ).


The interesting question for me is, where does Hopkins go after this? Surely he only has one or two more fights left in him. I'd like to see him against Chad Dawson, Lucian Bute, or maybe the winner of the Super Six tournament. I know he's been going on about fighting Haye, but I think that's very unlikely (and could be a very dangerous move).

Although Haye has a belt, he hasn't got what he wants, so can't see him doing anything other than chasing the Klit brothers (see what I did there). Only once he's done that (if he's sucessful) can I see him letting people chase him.


Than again, if the purse is huge and it's a prime time American fight, who knows.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yep, I would be very surprised if Jones managed to

> pull off a decent performance. (OK so he looked

> good against Lacy recently... but Lacy is pretty

> poor and was never a deserving champ).

>

> The interesting question for me is, where does

> Hopkins go after this? Surely he only has one or

> two more fights left in him. I'd like to see him

> against Chad Dawson, Lucian Bute, or maybe the

> winner of the Super Six tournament. I know he's

> been going on about fighting Haye, but I think

> that's very unlikely (and could be a very

> dangerous move).


I just don't think he CAN give up. I don't think he'd know what to do with himself. Obviously working for Golden Boy Promotions was supposed to be the first step towards civilian life and quitting fighting, but the fact that he obviously still wants to fight suggests he's not as completely engrossed in it as he might have thought.


If he is daft enough to fight Haye and if a network is daft enough to pay for it, he'll get taken out on a stretcher, and that is something you would never have thought possible to even contemplate for Hopkins. Haye's natural weight of 16 stone versus BHop bulking up to 14st 5lbs from his likely natural weight of 12.5/13st is just foolish.


With that degree of natural difference, plus modern sports science etc, boxing ability is in danger of becoming a moot point in the affair. Haye lands a couple of times properly, Hopkins won't be able to diffuse such massive bombs like he usually does.


It is far harder to move up to heavyweight than say welter to light-middle. The relatively recent introduction of the cruiserweight division is a tacit acknowledgment of that. Even now, it is very often a jump too far for a smaller cruiser to make.


Obviously there are exceptions, like Valuev vs haye, but Valuev is such an abject performer that his size is not the insurmountable obstacle that it should be.

So Edwin Valero has secured his 27th win, making them all by KO apparently (I have to say I thought one win last year went the distance, but hey-ho). This guy is a banger, both hands, and like I've said he can move too - not just one dimensional. In defence of his his WBC LW crown on Saturday he beat a guy that was a known quality boxer.


This guy is exciting. He is always 1 second away from ending the fight so far, I think he had 18 fights before actually having to experience what it was like to hear the opening bell for round 2 !

His stalking demeanour reminds me of Tyson.

Sure he'll get beat at some point but this guy could go someway to unifying belts if not avoided too much, also, he could make the LWW division extremely interesting if/when he moves up. If he does go up in weight, I'd like to see him in with someone like Zab Judah (not the best LWW but extremely talented).

Managed to catch most of the highlights of the 'Night of Champions' (Saturday, Wembley Arena).

There are some keen up/coming boxers, obviously we can't judge exactly how they'll eventually turn out but it was a great show they put on. Frankie Gavin and James DeGale did their thing (actually, DeGale looked OK) and Kevin Mitchell despatched Mendoza pretty convincingly in 2 (in fact, I've never seen a punch that having hit the opponent, causes him to involuntarily jump up into the air before he crumples to the floor...) and the durable Italian took some shots before the contest against Cleverly was stopped. You could argue why did it take Cleverly so many shots though - I think the Italian was just fine-chinned, I don't think he'd been down much in his career.

Cleverly says he wants Dawson, I think that's tooooo soon.

Mitchel may face David Diaz, also I think that may be too soon, but maybe I'm just being protective of Mitchell.

JTT - agreed, yeah I guess Audley demonstrates that olympic honours do not always guarantee honours in the pro ranks. Like I said it's too early to tell for sure, but that's a big part of the fun for me in watching their careers - I remember beating on the doors of houses in a village in Wiltshire where I was stationed, trying to find somebody with a TV that worked (mine had bust), so I could watch Khan's contest when he got beaten by Kindelan (sp.) to end-up with a Silver medal in 2006, nobody answered their doors [i still think there was a conspiracy against me that day] so I ended up listening to the end of it in the car on the radio. He's done very well since then, yes he's not granite-chinned etc etc but he's 22-23 yrs of age and not a crap boxer. I think he'll have some losses, why shouldn't he, and will be in some great contests. The 'new kids' hopefully will do well and I'll be cheering them on.


AC - yeah that clip was funny albeit probably not so funny being Zab at the time, I was surprised it was stopped as quite often the disorientation can pass quickly and by the end of a 10 count he may have been OK, howveer I have not seen the whole contest and perhaps he'd been battered round after round beforehand !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...