Jump to content

Chavs on dirt bikes


root

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta yes I agree the plumber/office worker

> comparison is weak inevitably because class is

> about more than money, as any snob who's played

> the 'keeping up with the joneses' game will

> verify.

>

> Louisa.


It's hilarious you guys talk about class like you're still living in the 1850s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta yes I agree the plumber/office worker

> comparison is weak inevitably because class is

> about more than money


But if someone from a certain "class" can earn more money than someone from a supposedly higher class, have their own business, have a nicer house, drive a nicer car, maybe even send their kids to private school if they choose... the concept of class starts to become irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EXACTLY!!!!!! I've been saying that on here since 2007 and no one bloody listens!


You can't lump everyone in to Working class / middle class it simply doesn't work.


People might describe themself as working class, but that's about mind set not finances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they work in a junior administrative position, in an office, then I applaud their behaviour - as although they don't have a lot of money, I consider them to be 'white collar' and therefore beyond reproach. They're probably just blowing off steam and who can really condemn a little hi-jinx.

If however, these motorcyclists work in the building trade, perhaps own their own firm / earn a six figure salary, I abhor such recklessness on the public carriageways. Clearly their blue collar occupation makes their actions quite reprehensible. Or... maybe it excuses them, they are after all victims of their own circumstance and society's class prejudice.

I am so confused. What if they were born into money but subsequently lost it all - do we give them a bike and encourage them to run over a banker with it or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy and Otta. Class shouldn't matter, but it does. Even more so today than it ever did in the past. A well developed underclass of people who are forgotten by society are a very visible sign of 21st century class. Even putting these people to one side, the way the institutional structures of this country work, a certain segment of the aristocratic classes will always be different to the rest of us based purely on blood lines regardless of wealth. A poor lord down on his luck is valued more than the working class person made good who's earned a small fortune. There is no such thing as class equality in this country and money doesn't necessarily play a part in this. The mindset of this country is that those at the top will always be better than those at the bottom, regardless of wealth.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ironic thing is - and this is my point. A poor lord, down on his luck, riding through the streets of ED on a lambretta (probably borrowed as he's poor) would be less likely to be stopped by the law than a working class person minding their own business walking down LL holding a couple of Iceland bags, purely based on the fact they would look more dodgy to the powers that be than the crazy psycho lord speeding along the pavement. Does that make sense?


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to be fair, some of those Iceland meals are probably more dangerous than a psychopathic Lord on a Lambretta.


Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The ironic thing is - and this is my point. A poor

> lord, down on his luck, riding through the streets

> of ED on a lambretta (probably borrowed as he's

> poor) would be less likely to be stopped by the

> law than a working class person minding their own

> business walking down LL holding a couple of

> Iceland bags, purely based on the fact they would

> look more dodgy to the powers that be than the

> crazy psycho lord speeding along the pavement.

> Does that make sense?

>

> Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy and Otta. Class shouldn't matter, but it

> does. Even more so today than it ever did in the

> past. A well developed underclass of people who

> are forgotten by society are a very visible sign

> of 21st century class. Even putting these people

> to one side, the way the institutional structures

> of this country work, a certain segment of the

> aristocratic classes will always be different to

> the rest of us based purely on blood lines

> regardless of wealth. A poor lord down on his luck

> is valued more than the working class person made

> good who's earned a small fortune. There is no

> such thing as class equality in this country and

> money doesn't necessarily play a part in this. The

> mindset of this country is that those at the top

> will always be better than those at the bottom,

> regardless of wealth.

>

> Louisa.


You mean there are morons who take pride in being the subjects of a monarchy instead of citizens of a nation who democratically elect their (no matter how symbolic only) head of state?


...and that there are glass ceilings? That you are unlikely to get a job at certain firms unless you have been introduced through the right channels or been to the right school? That you will never go past a certain point career wise unless you have established certain contacts and allegiances as a child that you could only get if your parents were of the right pedegree and sent you to the right school?


...or that you are at a disadvantage applying for a job if your name is Jermome Mbadiwe despite being better educated and competent than a guy called James Spencer.


It's messed up, but it's human nature and we still have a long way to go. Whist having a drink with a very senior person in another european country I witnessed this guy receiving a call from another very senior businessman in that country telling him off because he had employed a 'nobody' when there were kids of very 'good people' who needed to start their career in positions like that. In a north african country I was rebuked by an Arab because I went out on a date with a black girl. In the UK I had the worst time in my life at a company because it was hijacked by uber racist Afrikaaners whilst in yet another country I had some situations facilitated because of good deeds I had done to some Serbians (and I'm not Serbian).


Now Afrikaaners kids ... those can be a nasty bunch. Those kids could have very well been Afrikaaners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curiously, the under-class of which Louisa speaks is not in fact working class, but mainly 'not-working' class. In my experience working class people (i.e. those who earn their livings through manual and skilled trades rather than through office and non-manual work) take a pride in their appearance, behaviour and attitudes, and often form the backbone of any society, rather than attacking or undermining it. They are as likely (some might say more likely) to respect others, not to act without thought or with criminal or vandalistic intent etc. etc.


Of course, when celebrating, they can become as obnoxious in drink as any member of the Bullingdon, but this is alcohol, not class, talking.


The social classification that used to be used (A, B, C1, C2, D, E) would have placed what I think Louisa probably means by 'working class' in the C1, C2, D groups (from skilled and supervisory manual through to unskilled manual work) - E is reserved for those not in work and on state, or no, benefits (including just the state pension).


Her 'under class' are almost certainly all found in the E category. Of course retired working class people who only have a state (no occupational) pension would also classify as E - but I can't see them on motor bikes racing around the streets, quite.


'Middle class' would also be found in the C1 (and possibly, aspirationally in the C2 for semi-skilled clerical work).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Afrikaner kids on quad bikes, a rampaging eton educated lord rampaging through Iceland on a lambretta. This conversation is losing me. I was trying to be serious!


I agree about the class structure Penguin68 talks of. The structure appears to have become more complex these days, but the boundaries are there still despite a more muddled middle so to speak.


I think on the topic of bags, I wonder statistically if a stop and search crack down by the police has ever been aimed at the shopping bags we hold? I would probably estimate someone with an Iceland/lidl/aldi bag would be more likely to be stopped than someone sporting a Waitrose/M&S bag.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your mother is a builder and you're riding a 100cc scooter carrying one M&S bag and one Iceland bag, what is the probability of being stopped by the police?


Please show all your working, clearly listing any estimated physical quantities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What happens if you're Dad was The Duke of Norfolk, but your Mum was a skivvy at the Castle


And you didn't know, then became a Dustman and your wife ran off with another woman, she then moved back in with you, but bought the other woman with her


And you were named "Butch"


What class are you then ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think statistically speaking a teenager with one working class and one middle class parent on a scooter (carrying a bag from both Iceland and M&S) would be a highly unlikely scenario. However, if this did happen, I would reckon the officer involved would weigh up the character of the individual once stopped, and if they showed signs of being privately educated (posh accent) they would get a friendly tap on the shoulder and told to move. However, if they spoke with a traditionally working class regional accent they would probably be verbally probed a lot more. Out of interest, was this person riding their scooter on the pavement or were they being law abiding? This is a difficult one.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> of interest, was this person riding their scooter

> on the pavement or were they being law abiding?

> This is a difficult one.

>

> Louisa.


One was doing wheelies on the road, one was doing wheelies on the pavement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Perhaps the issue is that Southwark don’t listen. They didn’t take account of responses. The proposed CPZs for west Dulwich  stopped when the Council was threatened with a judicial review. Not before. Whatever consultation process was worse than flawed with McAsh arguing that because they were in power, they had a mandate and didn’t need to listen to anyone’s views, rendering any democratic process void.
    • We’re looking to buy a house in ED (3 Bed, 1,100 sq ft type). Quite a few we’ve found on Landells Road, Pellatt Road and Jennings Road are half houses. Does anyone have a view or any experiences of living/buying a half house?  
    • LTN means discriminating against those worst off - traffic, noise and air pollution is being pushed off to the main roads  where most vulnerable live on                
    • Yup. It involves listening before decision are made. It's not a referendum. Personally, I think it's good that 3,000 angry people don't get to dictate public policy, but we'll have to agree to disagree I guess (as an aside, if you actually look at the detail of the responses from the original consultation, they are all over the place. People saying they want to stop rat running, but also don't want to restrict through traffic for example). The council took account of the responses to the consultation, alongside data, expert opinions, commitments they made to the wider electorate etc. Then they made a decision and stood for re-election on the basis of their actions. You may not like it, but that's our system. Any chance you're willing to defend One Dulwich's claims now?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...