Jump to content

Chavs on dirt bikes


root

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chav thing isn't really the issue for me, it was

> more the "At best they'd make an organ doner."

> attitude.


Well, if someone doing dirt bike wheelies, without a helmet, on the pavement, had to crack open his skull against a lamp post I pity most the guys who have to clean up the mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh ferchrise sake, does every thread on this forum here have to descend into petty socio-politico-class clash-commentary bollocks?


I've seen this lot before. The other day they were a few feet away from my wife and son, wearing bandanas, riding on the PAVEMENT at about 50 mph.


Calling them chavs is the least of our problems. They had tracksuits on fwiw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LD: you might not recognise yourself as such, but you are part of that elite you disparage. You're well educated, in professional employment, articulate and computer literate. Even if you don't take part in the so called enrolment of "chavs" and certain other groups as whipping boys by the layer of society you pillory, you're still part of that group, at the tippety-tip-top of the pyramid.

Anyone acting like a tit-end+++ - riding aggressively and provocatively on pavements - deserves any right-minded person's deprecation, whatever socio-economic group, racial profile or cultural community they find themselves in, either by their own definition or that of others.


+++ nipples can also be a good thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ultraburner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Calling them chavs is the least of our problems.

> They had tracksuits on fwiw.


My bad I suppose as always assumed chav was an umbrella term for such scum. Looking up stuff on the web I learn there is much more to being a chav than being predominantly white, young, borderline criminal obnoxious and for all intents and purposes useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how do these chavs/assols/yummies afford bikes and petrol - or whatever - and why not call police or grease up the pavement, - Louisa is entitled to her opinion without being told to push off, as usual always picking out the bits that don't matter and sliding of the subject in question.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

susiq Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> how do these chavs/assols/yummies afford bikes and

> petrol - or whatever - and why not call police or

> grease up the pavement, - Louisa is entitled to

> her opinion without being told to push off, as

> usual always picking out the bits that don't

> matter and sliding of the subject in question.


I don't think I've ever seen yummies on dirt bikes or Lambrettas, although I quite like the idea of girls on Vespas.


Typing 'girl on vespa' in google and clicking the images link did not disappoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know some people think the word "chav" is loaded with class prejudice, but I disagree. As far as I'm concerned it's about how people choose to act, how they present themselves, and the desire to belong to a certain "tribe".


When I was (much) younger we'd use the word "townie" to refer to a similar social group... plenty of who came from comfortable homes in nice suburbs. I don't think that anyone believes the gold chain and tracksuit wearing stereotype applies to the whole of the "working class" (for want of a better term).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeremy but those connotations surrounding the stereotypical chav are all linked in with class prejudice. Someone could come from a perfectly respectable middle class family and lie cheat and steal and they would not be branded a chav. It seems to be a dated and lazy description to put down someone based on social class and nothing more. I also hear kids referring to something as being 'gay' to describe something they dislike or find beneath them. Again, equally as offensive to a gay person, even though it may not be aimed at gay people as a group or used in that context.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno... it's a slang word and therefore not sure if any formal definition is really correct. Of course there's a correlation with social class, but I wouldn't personally say it's a defining characteristic. miga, to take an example from popular culture - maybe Harry Enfield's loadsamoney character?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had thought 'chav' was more a tribal definition - reflecting, particularly, chosen dress style - i.e. Burberry checks, tightly tied back hair (for girls) and so on - a slightly old fashioned version of the TOWIE look. To some extent an ironic working class take on Sloane Rangers (and, because of the Burberry link, hugely annoying to same). As far as behaviour was concerned, certainly up-front and slightly aggressive, but not as described (implictly) here. It is, I think, class linked (because of its comparison with Sloanes, if for no other reason) - but in a reasonably positive way, at least initially. Chavs, punks, hippies, goths, mods, rockers, Teddy Boys (granted different eras) were all initially style, not behavior descriptors.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

susiq Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> how do these chavs/assols/yummies afford bikes and

> petrol



In all seriousness, when I saw them I assumed they were "rich kids" (as in kids from comfortable backgrounds) simply because I imagine these bikes aren't exactly cheap.


But that could just be my own predudice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I first heard the words "chav, chavs, chavy, chavy's" back in around 1980/81


I was at Art School with a guy who married a Roma girl. They used the name/word to discribe children in the comunity. It was never used in a derogoatry way back then


The word reappeared later to my mind with the website "Chav Scum" or whatever it was called. Maybe misused as racial slur against Gypsy travellers, to then include the not in work emerging under-class


It's lazy and provocative, but I do see it being hijacked by the "offended by proxy/class warrior" brigade, the offence then being whipped back as a predictable dig at the middle classes. In my mind, this is as lazy but a tad more venomous than the originally misjudged slur


One is a lazy denigration of a social group, the other definitely a 'class war' spitefulness and usually perpetrated by the same old - same old


In a February 2005 article in The Times, Julie Burchill argued that use of the word is a form of "social racism", and that such "sneering" reveals more about the shortcomings of the "chav-haters" than those of their supposed victims.


Whatever, it's boring and predictable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Otta brilliant point you make. Working-class kids would not be able to afford such bikes in the first place, and yet it is assumed by many on here that they had to be working class or "chavs" simply because of the sort of anti social behaviour they were taking part in. Why would it be inconceivable to suggest that some middle-class white boys who attend a private school were not riding recklessly around the streets on bikes. And if they were, would that behaviour still be described as "chav" - I don't think it would. It's classic class discrimination that's what it is.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...