Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You've done it again Giggi and TLS, had a crap journey into work today, which even reading Simon Gray's Smoking Diaries couldn't improve.

The tin hat was placed on it when I kicked an abandoned cup of coffee not knowing it was half full and befouled my shiny boots.

Then along the two of you come and change my internal soundtrack from Slipknot's People = Sh!t to Ray Stevens Everything Is Beautiful in just two short posts.


HUGS to you both. (For TLS of course a manly 'bear' style one and for Giggi a gentle one.)

Dear Mr Honalooloo,


I am writing to tell you to go out and buy this month's Mojo magazine as it has a massive 12-page spread on your all time faves Mott The Hoople by Kris Needs and includes celeb fan tributes from the likes of Mick Jones, Tony James, Morrisey and Noel Gallagher and very good it is too though I suspect you may have already taken my advice but just in case you've not there it is.


All my lunch,


Jah x

Thanks for the heads up JL, but I already have said magazine.

Haven't read it yet, as I am saving it to savour over a brace or so of pints.

Kris Needs is well placed to write about MTH, he ran their fan club Sea Divers.

The late Benhazir Bhutto was a member you know.

The CD ain't half bad neither.

LuLu Too Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Crikey - I go away for 6 weeks and this thread is

> still here?

> Enough with the Mott the Hoople talk - please

> stay on topic.

> Now, back to HonaloochieB...


...and it's a treat that you still feel the same since 8th January LuLu.

But love me, love my Mott The Hoople.

I don't want any complications in the 'afterglow'.

And as you say, back to me...

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How could you do it Hb? We could have run and run

> with Bay City Rollers *swoon*.


And you know we coulda gone with the Rollers PGC.

They didn't do 'Rock 'n' Roll Love Letter' for no reason after all.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...