Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bigbadwolf Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I disagree Mike, my mental image of Rosie leads

> me

> > to think she's really fit.



Since when did Man eater have anything to do with the physical appearance of a woman? You see BBW this is where you let yourself down, the idiosyncrasies.

Four of my Favourite Posters, Mick Mac, RosieH, Mikecg, bigbadwolf all recently contributing on a thread in honour of one of EDF's finest, Sir Mott Honaloochie.


Now THIS is my kind of thread.


Oh! plus the added bonus of another hilarious interjection from Moos.


What more could anyone wish for, on here? :)-D

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's been a while Tony, good to see you're still

> with us. I've created a thread called 'Our' song

> and included you in it. Did I get it right?


Well I admit that Song is one of my 2,500 Singles ( that I rarely play now):)


My next door neighbour was a Dustman, when I lived in my last Council Flat, working for Southwark Council.


If he didn't finish his 1.0'clock shift and be home by 9.00AM he felt well hard done by(!)

I personally have always lusted after this 'lyrically fit and verbally equipped' wordsmith ever sine I joined the east dulwich forum. I'm not sure if you noticed but I once paid a pilot of a small prop plane to write in the sky his exhaust trail " I love honaloochieB and want his babies. Glad I got that off my chest.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bigbadwolf Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He did insist.

>

> He did insist? And you had to edit it? A sentence

> comprising eleven letters?

> Well alright, I was impressed with the prop plane

> gesture, you big lug you.


But hey, don't think this is an invitation to start a stream of post-pub banter OK.

This thread has gone alarmingly off-topic. Honestly, I go away for ten minutes and you can't be trusted. If you keep it up I will complain to Admin and each and every one of you will spend time on the naughty step. There may even be an article in the South London Press. I'm very cross. You've been warned.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread has gone alarmingly off-topic.

> Honestly, I go away for ten minutes and you can't

> be trusted. If you keep it up I will complain to

> Admin and each and every one of you will spend

> time on the naughty step. There may even be an

> article in the South London Press. I'm very

> cross. You've been warned.


At last reason has returned to her throne and we can get back to the core purpose of the thread.

Unless you are/think you are all in love with me and that, then kindly confine your attentions to other threads or indeed activities.

South London Press, eh?


Thanks for getting this lot to straighten up and fly right, Giggi.

HUGS

Narcissist! ;-)



HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> giggirl Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This thread has gone alarmingly off-topic.

> > Honestly, I go away for ten minutes and you

> can't

> > be trusted. If you keep it up I will complain

> to

> > Admin and each and every one of you will spend

> > time on the naughty step. There may even be an

> > article in the South London Press. I'm very

> > cross. You've been warned.

>

> At last reason has returned to her throne and we

> can get back to the core purpose of the thread.

> Unless you are/think you are all in love with me

> and that, then kindly confine your attentions to

> other threads or indeed activities.

> South London Press, eh?

>

> Thanks for getting this lot to straighten up and

> fly right, Giggi.

> HUGS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm sure they have good reasons, yet safety for the residents who pay the CT should be a priority. £63 million on Other Services?  
    • Southwark Council have a £70m budget shortfall over the next three years, largely driven by the raising cost of adult social care, children’s social care and homelessness. I am sure they’d like to prioritise street cleaning more, but this isn’t realistic. If you’re interested in a breakdown of how they spend their money, the headlines are here:  https://www.southwark.gov.uk/council-tax/how-we-manage-council-tax/our-budget-and-how-we-spend-council-tax/our-income-and I’m sure there are areas where the council could make better decisions or be more efficient, but they’re working in a very challenging financial context.
    • Would you not expect clean streets to be a priority? Rather than suggesting those in Southwark pay more, would it not be more relevant that Southwark actually prioritise it and explain what they are spending our money on.   
    • Batter than closing the whole line down all weekend which they do very often on that line.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...