Jump to content
Message added by Administrator,

Due to this topic being excessively long, a new 2024 "New Shops in Dulwich / Peckham" has been opened here. Please continue the discussion there.

Recommended Posts

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please don't be surprised in 5 years time when

> Lordship Lane, becomes another faceless high

> street.

>

> This is, in fact, unlikely. Most of the LL shops

> have far too small a footprint to be commercially

> attractive to 'the High Street' shops. They need

> both frontage and storage areas. That has been our

> saving grace - we are great for small local

> independants, not attractive to chains. More

> likely is that increasing rates and rents drive

> everyone out - and we end up with closed shops or

> charity/ pop-ups. It is net profitability per

> square metre which is the driver in any retail

> operation. Drive up fixed costs and you drive down

> profitability, for any given turnover.



Hi Penguin68

With all due respect about 25% of Lordship lane, are chains. Due to the rents being so high, chains are the only business who can afford the rent. The recent addition of the chain As Nature intended, pay ?5000pcm in rent. This chain have stores in Balham, Chiswick, Ealing, Marble arch other expensive locations.

Chains like the mentioned store can afford the high rents, other small independent businesses, cannot.

Personally, I don't have a problem with chains per se. As long as they are not completely crowding out new start ups (which I don't think they are locally) and they have a good offer, then I don't see the problem. The issue of ever increasing rents does need to be addressed however. The real problem is the number of shops-to-flats conversions which took place in the past, which have reduced the supply of shop space. All those previous shops on North Cross / Upland Road would probably be quite attractive now and the increase in retail space may have helped keep rents down.

> recent addition of the chain As Nature intended,

> pay ?5000pcm in rent. This chain have stores in

> Balham, Chiswick, Ealing, Marble arch other

> expensive locations.



?5k a month in rent, you sure? Theyll need to sell a lot of mung beans to make that one work out.

With all due respect about 25% of Lordship lane, are chains


Almost all the largest retail properties are already chains, certainly, but largest here is a relative thing. Generally they either sell very high-value items (such as the estate agents we have) or have high-frequency sales (such as the chain coffee shops or bookies) or have comparatively small relatively high value items (i.e.pharmacies or jewelers). Chains tend to have minimum size outlets they want to take-up - most of our continuing independants fall below that minimum size - although the size criterion can be reduced for 'mini' outlets (where the item prices are often higher than in larger stores). Where we do have chains they tend to be of the smaller type (hand-fulls of stores) , rather than the national chains which inhabit traditional high streets. However, what we are also seeing is a significant change in retailers generally - my own view is that traditional high streets will continue to deplete 'traditional high street stores' rather than them spreading to LL. Small chains and specialist retailers may well be the store of the future, offering something that you can't (yet) get on-line.

I visited Marks and Spencer's yesterday for the first time in a couple of months. I also wandered in to the new sweet shop and decided that I could not afford any of the goods on offer. However I did purchase a couple of items in Superdrug and also Farmers. My family and I try to support local eateries i.e. Johnnies, Dulwich caf?, Mr.Lu and a couple of the Indian restaurants. but the majority of the other eateries are places we would only go for very special occasions due to their costs. The last time I went into one of the pubs was meeting some old work colleagues a couple of years ago for a drink (none of us wanted to pay the prices quoted for meals).


I fully understand that high rents mean high priced goods as traders struggle to exist. A chain wanted to purchase the large St. Christopher's shop but since this was a high money making venue for the Hospice, they agreed to pay the increased rent- consequently the price of all their 'goods' had to be increased. If I remember correctly, the shop has to achieve ?1,000 plus a day to meet rental costs and money towards the hospice.


I do not know what the answer is- more 'niche' shops with high prices? empty shops reflecting 'failed' businesses?

do we know who the landlords are for the majority of shops in LL?. Perhaps my previous rant about ED not being disabled friendly is putting off shoppers/residents who have the financial means to be able to support local businesses.

I don?t mind Waitrose as I prefer it to Marks/Co-Op plus my grocery shop is Ocado/Waitrose so it suits my needs. I just think opposite Marks and the fact that the shop is quite small is a weird location for them to choose.

Well, I wished for a sushi place and Waitrose many years ago, I guess wishes do come true!

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Most of the LL shops have far too small a footprint to be commercially

> attractive to 'the High Street' shops.


Strangely, one of the larger units on LL - East Dulwich Deli - was split up into two, after which a chain (Sweaty Betty) took half of it. So... I am not 100% convinced of this argument.

Strangely, one of the larger units on LL - East Dulwich Deli - was split up into two, after which a chain (Sweaty Betty) took half of it. So... I am not 100% convinced of this argument.


This is certainly a chain, but it's hardly a 'High Street' chain. It describes itself as offering 'boutiques' (40-50 in the UK so hardly in every, or most, high streets) - and it is very much a specialist retailer. ED fits its target demographic quite well. As a 'boutique' its footprint requirement is more limited. If you were asked to list 'typical' High Street stores, I doubt whether it would ever make your, or anybody else's top 30.


This is the sort of shop which may well come to replace the traditional High St store, over time.

imasnookercue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > recent addition of the chain As Nature

> intended,

> > pay ?5000pcm in rent. This chain have stores in

> > Balham, Chiswick, Ealing, Marble arch other

> > expensive locations.

>

>

> ?5k a month in rent, you sure? Theyll need to sell

> a lot of mung beans to make that one work out.


Hi imasnookercue

Yes we have a very reliable contact, who confirmed the monthly payments. ANI were so determined to open a shop on the lane, they were prepared to pay a premium rent.

I thought it may be useful to people on this thread to post the planning classes as "change of use" is mentioned a few times on here. One type of shop changing into another type of shop doesn't constitute change of use in terms of planning and therefore doesn't require permission from the council.


3 Class A ? shops (including some services)

3.1 Class A1 ? shops and retail outlets

3.2 Class A2 ? professional services

3.3 Class A3 ? food and drink

3.4 Class A4 ? drinking establishments

3.5 Class A5 ? hot food and takeaway

4 Class B ? further business and industrial activities

4.1 Class B1 ? business

4.2 Class B2 - general industrial use

4.3 Class B8 ? storage or distribution

5 Class C ? hotels, hostels and dwelling houses

5.1 Class C1

5.2 Class C2

5.3 Class C3

5.4 Class C4-large HMOs

6 Class D ? non-residential institutions

6.1 Class D1

6.2 Class D2

7 Sui generis (eg nightclubs)


Renata

  • 2 weeks later...

derwentgrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The other William Hill (opposite ED station) is

> also now empty. The smaller unit next door (the

> other side of Vale End, also empty) is apparently

> going to be a funeral director - William Dunphy. I

> guess that counts as another change of use!



William Dunphy will also be opening a Florist in one of the old Grove Vale library premises.

  • 3 months later...

Rent increase forced Sogim out, again Landlords rather have empty properties, then charge affordable rents.

Lordship Lane used to be 80% Independent stores, 20% chain, due to high rents, I fear the balance is now going to switch to more chains. Who can afford ?50.000.00 per year rent, plus overheads???

I've been shopping more online lately. In stores, not all products are such as in online stores. In online stores you can find a lot of interesting products at a good price. I recently ordered Socks for family Socks for family . Socks of excellent quality and design. It's a new brand.

Jakido Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Both the Fried Chicken shop and The Bakery next to

> Meatliqour are showing no signs of life.



Lordship lane is dying before our eyes..greed has killed it

it'll soon be short lease phone shops and more souless chains

Shivering swan1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Kebab & Wine now shut too, sign in the window

> saying they are having a refurb, but then that's

> what 'Truly Scrumptious' said too...


Spoke to the Owners Son yesterday.


They are doing some repair works.. ?? cement concreting or something. ??


Closed for 4 - 5 days ???


Who Knows. ? I'm not to sure.. ?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’d just like local family businesses to not be shut down by big chains, and I think we should support local businesses and our community. I’m sure they are very nice people who pay their taxes too.   
    • maxxi maxes out. Week 8 points...   Week 8 table...  
    • You may have seen an article in the paper today about Jewish leaders and notables calling on the UN and world leaders to sanction Israel [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/22/jewish-notables-open-letter-un-sanction-israel], "... Prominent Jewish figures around the world are calling on the United Nations and world leaders to impose sanctions on Israel over what they describe as “unconscionable” actions amounting to genocide in Gaza. Over 450 signatories, including former Israeli officials, Oscar winners, authors and intellectuals have signed an open letter demanding accountability over Israel’s conduct in Gaza, the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. The letter’s release comes as EU leaders meet in Brussels on Thursday amid reports they plan to shelve proposals for sanctions over human rights violations. “We have not forgotten that so many of the laws, charters, and conventions established to safeguard and protect all human life were created in response to the Holocaust,” the signatories write. “Those safeguards have been relentlessly violated by Israel.” ..."   There is also a petition we can sign to support them in their call for justice: Direct link: https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/stand_with_jews_demand_action_loc_cp1/?tUwBCsb&v=502713833&cl=22394973010&_checksum=7dc99acb5dd4fc5a43a24e21772f51005ea239753e9ae3033d9f79ffd6119559 "For the first time since the ceasefire, a powerful coalition of Jewish voices have come together, urging world leaders to keep the pressure up until real accountability and freedom are achieved.Their call can shift the political mood and give leaders courage to act decisively -- Amplify their voices and stand with them: The demands of Global Jewish Voices: To respect and abide by the decisions of the International Court of Justice, noting their application also in the West Bank and East Jerusalem; to apply arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court; and to resist efforts to unduly pressure and influence and prevent the workings of both courts. To refuse any complicity in continued crimes and violations of international law against Palestinians by Israel, including by ending the provision of arms and other relevant goods and services; to use relevant leverage, including targeted sanctions on governmental bodies and individuals responsible for violations of international law, and suspension of relations with commercial entities contributing to these violations. To ensure that humanitarian assistance reaches all Palestinians in Gaza at the scale that is commensurate to their vital need, that the blockade is lifted and materials for reconstruction enter, and that there is a full Israeli military withdrawal. To refute false accusations of antisemitism that abusively deploy our collective history to tarnish those with whom we stand together in the pursuit of peace and justice. If you are of Jewish heritage you can also sign here, and we will add the number of your voices to support the Jewish call for justice. Posted: 22 October 2025"  
    • I've actually met Luke Johnson and he's actually a very amicable, witty and extremely clever man. He's also created thousands of jobs and generated millions and millions of pounds of tax revenue for the government, offering goods and hospitality that countless millions of people have enjoyed over the decades. I'm not a fan of Gail's but I'm also not a fan of people who knock down good guys that have contributed a huge amount to this country.  Anyway, French Patisseries and southern hemisphere coffee don't belong on Farmer's markets. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...