Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Actually the women-only sessions at the leisure centre are legally exempt of the sex discrimination act which recognises that there is a time and place for single sex services and activities. Ring the Equal Opportunities Commission to check this if you like!


Plus, the Gender Duty Act is coming into force in April - which makes it a legal duty for public services to look at the differing needs of men and women and offer appropriate services accordingly.

Until reading this I didn't realise how obsessed the men of East Dulwich are with swimming on a thurs night.

Is there something sacred and special about this night above the others that means our local chaps feel the urge to run to expanses of water?

The one time a muslim friend tried to attend the womens only session she still couldn't as they only had male lifeguards on which I think is worse than having the sessions in the first place - if offered they should be staffed appropriately.

Quite right buggie!


And as a believer in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, I would like a session staffed entirely by egg noodles. I would also like to have the session whenever anyone else wants to go swimming, and I would like the others to be excluded unless they can prove themselves devout pastafarians.


I would like to do this because I'm shy, and because I'm scared that my peculiar religious rituals will lack meaning unless I can either impose them on other people or at least make their lives more difficult. ;-)

Being a fellow pastafarian I'm delighted at the suggestion, but fear for the egg noodles safety around so much water.

I belive bulgar pasta is a hardier varietal, and will be much safer.


Actually I'm also a bit of a 9 stone weakling, so there should also be a 'shy skinny men ridiculed by women and had sand kicked in face night', with no women to snigger and buff men to bully. Perhaps I can squeeze it in after the latvian pole jumpers' gardeners session on a tuesday afternoon.

>Is there something sacred and special about this night above the others that means our local chaps feel the urge to run to expanses of water?


not really, just a convenient night for me although there is a self help group being set up to help all the "Men obsessed with swimming on a Thursday evening in East Dulwich but can't" (MOWSOATEIEDBC for short).


I agree that it should be staffed appropriately at a women only session, it does seem a bit daft to have a man there although if a female lifeguard wasn't available I assume it's better to have a male lifeguard there than none at all or call off the session.


Anyway, I hear the Women's Institute is now allowing men to join which is nice.

There is probably nothing particularly special about Thursday nights - no. Nor was there really anything special about the specific circumstances that led to a great many protests about inequality. For example, I doubt that it would really make that much difference to women in the long run if they were paid 1 or 2% less than men doing the same job. Equally, it probably doesn't really make that much difference to most women that certain London gentlemen's clubs exclude female members but that's not really the point is it? It is the fact that certain policies represent an attitude of discrimination and symbolise certain attitudes that is significant.

"I personally am tired of the nanny state intervening with a kind of enforced discrimination that is supposed to redress the balance re. our racist/sexist/homophobic/whatever past".


The 'Nanny state' aka Southwark Council will be quite rightly responding to the fact that when they look at their stats, they see very few women and even fewer from ethnic minorities using their facilities. What would you suggest they do?


I personally dislike the ubiquitous accusations of 'nanny state' (largely pushed by the likes of Rupert Murdoch) although it is a perennial problem and has been around since debates about public health issues like seatbelts and motorcycle helmets, I'm sure accusations of 'heavy handed state intervention' were also used to resist abolition of slavery, votes for women... I'm sure people can think of other attempts to create a fairer world that have been met with this brand of conservatism.

UJ you've conflated two diametrically opposed ideas there: exclusive male only clubs and unfettered swimming pool access.


The point is that swimming pool access is not exclusive, it's open to all. It's progressive and inclusive.


To make swimming pool access women only is regressive. It is exclusive, separatist and only a short step to elitist. 'Women only access' is about elevating the needs of a particular group of individuals above society as a whole, and is the doublethink that led to some of the terrible social crimes of the past.


I may sound like I'm logic chopping, but I find it extraordinary that one could compare women only swimming provision with part of the fight against the slave trade and the quest for universal suffrage. It's quite the opposite.

> What's to stop you going up to Forest Hill pool at that time, or any other pool for that matter?


It's harder to get to Forest Hill or any other than it is to go to the pool in East Dulwich. And if someone's paid a membership to use a pool it's make sense for them to use that pool rather than have to use another where they would have to pay again.

Do you also resent money being spent on children's libraries, and space and time in libraries being earmarked for particular user groups? After all, the tiny chairs cannot be used by you, and there are all those picture books you can't read! And what about all those youth clubs with pool tables (paid for from the public purse!) that you are not permitted to take advantage of?


Louisiana

Or do you resent those old people's day centres, for the exclusive use of the elderly?! Just think of all the over-stewed tea you're missing out on.


And crikey, they've even got mobile libraries! For disabled and housebound people! And not you! How unfair is that?!


Louisiana

Sexual identity is one matter, bringing religion into the arguement reduces the whole debate into farce.You cannto choose your gender, but you make a conscious decision to follow a religion


to make excuses and allowances for reglious belief, that impacts on others who do not follow your particualr thread of belief is wrong.


You choose to follow a regligion that restricts your access to members of the opposite sex, then that your your problem - get on with it - expecting everyone else to make allowances to accomodate your brand os belief is simply unjust.



Inclusion, yes, but at the cost of othered being excluded because of their gender ?


no.

Personally I don't resent those, I think they're great. Anything that helps and encourages people to develop is brilliant in my book, it doesn't matter who they are.


I'm bored of this now. The original basis of posting was about wouldn't it be nice if Fusion would open the pool to everyone after the women only session. I'm not saying don't have a women only session, I'm not saying don't have a women only session. Now it's reverted to implications of resentment of children's, elderly and disabled facilities which is quite frankly pathetic and offensive.


We're talking of making a 2 hour women only session on a Thursday into a one hour session so more people can enjoy themselves. Get it into perspective.



*takes big breath in, breathes out and relaxes*

I'm sure Fusion will respond to demand. If there is insufficient demand for the women's sessions, they will go. The one other pool I know of that runs these sessions (in east London) is pretty busy.


My particular bugbear is the crap selection of electronic music that Dulwich library stocks (you know, Ibiza Dance Anthems 2001-6). When I enquire further why there is no Brian Eno etc etc, they claim that that's all people take out, and when they didn't stock this stuff 'nobody took out the electronic records'. So that's what they buy and stock, and they tell me to go to Stoke Newington library (Elephant and Castle) if I want anything else. So much for market forces.


Louisiana

That Elderly daycentres thing is a bloody stupid arguement, as daycentres for the elderly are purpose built for that very reason, they're not public day centres that take membership fees from non elderly people!


For the record, Forest Hill has women only sessions too, Mrs Keef avoids them like the plague as it gets so busy!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That Elderly daycentres thing is a bloody stupid

> arguement, as daycentres for the elderly are

> purpose built for that very reason, they're not

> public day centres that take membership fees from

> non elderly people!


Schools and built for children, but that doesn't stop other user groups from making use of them (e.g. private music classes, community groups, private residents' associations, sports clubs, elections etc etc.) It's just a queation of where 'society's' thinking is at any particular point in time, what priorities are, what resources there are, what the populace is demanding. This shifts all the time.


>

> For the record, Forest Hill has women only

> sessions too, Mrs Keef avoids them like the plague

> as it gets so busy!


I wouldn't know, as I don't go swimming any more. I used to go to Forest Hill, but haven't been since being smashed up in a train crash in '91 (I spent several months at Lewisham Hospital doing hydrotherapy with a physio in their pool, but the NHS timed me out once the shoulder had some movement). I miss it quite a lot, but just can't cope with public pools any more.


Louisiana

Schools open to other groups outside of school time, they don't say that the boys can't come to school one day as they're having a girls only session... Unless of course parents choose to send kids to single sex schools, in which case it's not in issue! This thread has just turned in to a pathetic battle of the sexes, there's no need for it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...