Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sands - What Drxsyter said, I think Barclays have a decent trading platform too where you can buy.T here are some cheaper ones too but most occasional user feel better with a name. Now if you're really brave you can do a CFD or spreadbet on the share price which will give you more leaverage....but it also is partly why we are in the sh!t we are in!!! If you want to do that IG Index is ok...but that's more scary!! Infact, forget it...just buy some shares...I think they've a good chance
Thanks for the advice. I've registered with Interactive Investor so just got to wait for the paperwork to come through. I kind of understand the principles of spread betting from Sporting Index and Betfair but I think it's a quick way for a fool like me to be parted with my money quickly.
  • 2 weeks later...

OK, hence my get-out clause of "I've not checked to see what's being offered". I admit I know relatively little about the consumer industry, spread-betting, etc.


However, options do not require a margin... and even if nobody was issuing new contracts, surely there are exchange-traded options out there for RBS and other banks?

  • 1 month later...

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OK, hence my get-out clause of "I've not checked

> to see what's being offered". I admit I know

> relatively little about the consumer industry,

> spread-betting, etc.

>

> However, options do not require a margin... and

> even if nobody was issuing new contracts, surely

> there are exchange-traded options out there for

> RBS and other banks?



Options are great if you want to to silly punts of absurd products - eg a short dated ?5.00 call on RBS will be almost zero to buy - nominal.


anything that is a decent delta will reuire a hefty slab of up front investment



the beauty of options , is that you can effectively go short without having to go through the arsewipe process of stock borrowing or treading dangerously in an illiquid index site



Pub bores may waffle on about black scholes, but theyse muppets innit, cos they doesnt take account of some aspect of volatility bludz

For the small private investor, Covered Warrants (same principle as Options but cheaper in size) are a good investment stratagy if you think an underlying stock is going to move up or down from a Covered Warrant strike price before it's maturity date. As with Options, the Covered Warrant although cash settled, gives you the right but not the obligation to buy the underlying stock at a fixed price. Your maximum loss is the one off premium you pay for the Covered Warrant plus any Broker trade commission.


The further out of the money and less time to maturity the cheaper the Covered Warrant. For instance today you could have bought a Goldman Sachs RBS Call from your Broker at a strike price of 80p for 0.93p with a maturity of June 09. Now if tomorrow RBS suddenly shot up to 80p* then your Covered Warrant would, in theory, fly up to at least a tad under 80.93p. So overnight the value of your Covered Warrant would have increased by 87 times. A ?1,000 investment would suddenly be worth ?87,000 - whereas if you invested your ?1,000 in the actual RBS stock (30p) it would then be worth ?2,666 (80p a RBS share).


Of course if the RBS never reaches 80p before June 09 then you lose your ?1,000 on the Covered Warrant (unless you sell it before expiry) - whereas if you bought the RBS stock outright then it would retain some value depending on actual RBS price.


* This is purely to aid the example

Yup it is a very long shot and wouldn't recommend anyone using that example as an investment decision as you'd probably be better off putting it all on Porto to beat Man U at Old Trafford Tuesday night!!


BTW, the example I used is actually a Societe Generale RBS Warrant not Goldman Sachs.. if anyone interested in seeing how much the RBS warrants fluctuate each day - http://uk.warrants.com/services/quotes/search.php?family=WARRANT&typeul=SHARE&ullabel=RBOS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...