Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Vale? I don't mind as long as it's got beer and a

> decent view


Definately got decent views what with 4 or 5 screens and plenty of seating areas. Not sure on all the pumps but they do serve proper Becks and Strongbow.


Trouble is Anna, this is the last game of the season on Wednesday, so I think we have no other choice.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Think I read on here the other day that Sandperson

> was away. Should we wait until everyone can make

> it or just go for it?

>

> Would you come Atila?

>

> Think I've met most people who regularly

> contribute to this thread now.


Anna I'd love to come but Wednesday nights are my regular 5 a side footie night and as it's the only exercise I get I'm loath to miss out on it. If you're going to the next EDF booze up I'll try and come along as I'd like to meet you all, and yes, even Sandperson.

Well I'm a definate attender for Wednesday at the Vale. Sounds like ratty, ????, Anna (and possibly Keef) can so far be counted on. Hopefully a few more are able to attend, perhaps Red Devil, LadyGooner, Sharon H, Mockney, Sean, Tony, Mick Mac, Jah Lush, david_carnell, SimonM, Mikecg to name but a few (apologies if I've missed any names)

I don't think Milan will be laughing.. as they could have coined another ?42m on top if they'd sold Kaka in January to City.


Real Madrid and Barcelona are always under immense pressure to deliver - but even if Real beef up their team further with Ronaldo, Ribery, Alonso they'd still not look as good as Barcelona on paper at least. So what ever happens this summer you have to make Barcelona favourites for La Liga and Champions League next season.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I'm a definate attender for Wednesday at the

> Vale. Sounds like ratty, ????, Anna (and possibly

> Keef) can so far be counted on. Hopefully a few

> more are able to attend, perhaps Red Devil,

> LadyGooner, Sharon H, Mockney, Sean, Tony, Mick

> Mac, Jah Lush, david_carnell, SimonM, Mikecg to

> name but a few (apologies if I've missed any

> names)


Cheers Matt - Not really a big England fan but I am a beer fan, so I'll try to get a pass.

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> more are able to attend, perhaps Tony,

>

> Thanks Mick but I work for Friday Nights and

> Saturdays and guess what? Every other Wednesday

> and, sadly, its my turn this week. Maybe a

> Mon/Tues/Thurs/Sun or 50/50 Wed..lol



What do you mean "Mick Mac wrote" TLS - It was probably someone else that invited you.....Matt123 perhaps


I'm a bit touchy about my male correspondents today - I've already been PM'd inviting me to "pink" drinks, did anyone else get this? what did I do to deserve that???? - I only joined this forum to chat to strange woman and its all going wrong.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Matt - can we recognise you by your mobile?


Assuming the Football drinks don't now clash with another drinks you have accepted, I've PM'd you my mobile number so you can identify my Samsung D900 when it rings ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What Firkins were they? The only localish ones I remember were the Phoenix and Firkin and the Fox and Firkin. The Plough has changed its name several times, and then back to the Plough, but to the best of my recollection the Uplands Tavern was named that until it became The Actress, and The Bishop was called something else whose name escapes me (though the smell from the gents lingers in my memory) but I'm pretty sure it wasn't a Firkin?
    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...