Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah - interesting. If I trust anyone in footy

> then I trust Peter.... did I actually type

> that???? What's your opinion of him quids, as an

> ex west ham man??


Ratty - During our Bond Scheme fiasco I wrote him a long and ranty letter which he had the decency to respond to and address all my points, which I was impressed with...generally some fans I know that are closer to the club thought he was a genuine guy

Ooh what was that I was saying about slips early in season and everybody writing them off. Expect them to hit a vein of form in the new year and overtake Arsenals early promise to make it a two horse race against Chelski.


God it's getting more predictable and boring than formula one isn't it :(

Mick Mac Wrote:

Its next Weds Tony. No tickets I'm afraid and despite the score last night I think they will be hard to get. Unless you are winding me up of course.


I work Wednesday evenings but if it had been on another night and we could have got tickets I would have liked to have gone for the craic Mick...

Interesting banter on certain Football Forums between West Ham fans and Spurs fans regarding The Hammers forthcoming "2 games at Home in 2 days"...Hammers fans say they would rather lose 5/0 to Spursand beat The Wall.

Spurs reply with "You consider there is a greater rivalry with a 3rd Division side!!"...and then add that says a lot about you(!) referring to West Ham, of course.


Then The Hammers fans retorted "No! this says more about YOU !".....:))

Typical of my ruddy luck.


I told anyone who cared to listen that, with this current strike-force, United are a good "Lay" at short odds in many Away matches and they have to play Burnley Away on the only Midweek evening that I have to work.


Lay United ?600-?200 ON and do Burnley/United at 40/1= ?600-?15 and "Draw-United ?100 @ 4/1).


As long as United don't lead at Half-Time you are on a big winner, whatever the result.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...