Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

According to the latest Dulwich estate newsletter:


HALF MOON will be redeveloped as a pub/hotel

CROWN & GREYHOUND refurbishment has been delayed but opening as pub/hotel in 2016

GROVE TAVERN - little prospect of it reopening as a pub, the estate would like to redevelop it as a mix of commercial and residential units.


http://www.dulwichestate.co.uk/docs/general/dulwich-estate-bulletin-issue3.pdf

Well it's actually very disruptive, not just to locals such as myself, but also to the businesses locally who struggle with the high rents. The Dog is a major attraction and neighbouring (this spell check is American you know)shops benefit hugely from it being open and suffer when it is closed for long periods such as this. Is it any coincidence that Shepards have had to sell out to Sainsbury's?


It is of course very easy to criticise the Dulwich Estate but they really should get their act together on this and the Half Moon, and the Grove. It is having an adverse effect at all of these locations, although I think most of all in the Village, and you do wonder what the Charity Commissioners are thinking allowing this sort of thing to continue.

The Dulwich Estate's only objective is to increase it's annual income for the benefit of a handful of elite private schools. It's a charity in the strict legal sense, but not as it's commonly understood - i.e. giving freely to those in need.
That's the whole point. They are not doing their job, which is to maximise their revenues, by letting the pub stay empty for a couple of years, longer with the Grove. What is the real cost to the Estate of this seemingly disjointed approach to the management of their assets?
Or, perhaps, they are doing their job. A pub with vacant possession may appreciate in value far more than any rental income it could generate. This would allow DE to sell off unencumbered properties to developers when their market value is highest. Not pretty, not socially-minded but welcome to free market economics.

Mugglesworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or, perhaps, they are doing their job. A pub with

> vacant possession may appreciate in value far more

> than any rental income it could generate. This

> would allow DE to sell off unencumbered properties

> to developers when their market value is highest.

> Not pretty, not socially-minded but welcome to

> free market economics.


I'm doing the same with an inherited house (not my choice).

So are the Chinese with half of central London.


But an empty house is horrible really - same as an empty pub.

I doubt very much if The Grove Tavern could ever sustain itself as a Pub or Pub/Restaurant in todays climate.

Its simply in the wrong place. Was ok back in the day when drink driving was a lot more relaxed.

Which explains why there is car parking for 80+ ? cars.


The Crown & Greyhound (Once two pubs) Could possible survive as a Pub..

I'm not too sure who would stay there if it became a hotel. Too far from central London ??

..and a bit isolated with poor transport links.


The Half Moon was always a popular Pub and good Music Venue. (Steve Waller. God bless him)

It has better transport links with a Train Station.

Not sure about it being a Hotel.. Perhaps in Victorian times with the coming of the Steam Railway.



DulwichFox

"The Crown & Greyhound (Once two pubs) Could possible survive as a Pub..

I'm not too sure who would stay there if it became a hotel. Too far from central London ??

..and a bit isolated with poor transport links."


It will be popular with those visiting from outside London, come to see their grown up children and grand-children. I think it's a lovely spot for a hotel, North Dulwich station just up the road.

Mugglesworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or, perhaps, they are doing their job. A pub with

> vacant possession may appreciate in value far more

> than any rental income it could generate. This

> would allow DE to sell off unencumbered properties

> to developers when their market value is highest.

> Not pretty, not socially-minded but welcome to

> free market economics.


Exactly this. It does stick in the craw that they have charitable status and enjoy tax breaks though. The criteria for awarding charitable status really ought to be overhauled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...