Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Bignumber5 I've never supplied or trafficked Cannabis to anyone. It was a response to a stupid post asking people to come forward with information that would access the poster to contraband, dickhead.


Yes I have hit a child but I don't consider the person in question to be the benefactor of any sympathy as he was one of the little scrotes who enjoy intimidating the likes of you not to mention he insinuated that I interfered with adolescents so no, I have no problem with giving the little c&nt a belt round the bonce. It's a shame fired up little Guardian readers like yourself get so pussy whipped by kids who rely on your looking the other way. Apologies for not turning the other lily livered cheek.


I'll concede that my indulgence in drowning cats could quite rightly be considered attention seeking but it was mainly for a laugh. The microwave is far more practical.


I think in future you should take alot of what I say with a pinch of salt or if in real doubt consult the oracle itself.


Peace.

Bigbadwolf wrote,

I'll concede that my indulgence in drowning cats could quite rightly be considered attention seeking but it was mainly for a laugh. The microwave is far more practical.


I agree that the microwave is the best option,


1). Take cat and place in microwave

2). Full power for 2 hours

3). Leave home to go down the pub

4). Return home to find a small black dot on the platter

5). Throw black dot in bin


Simple when you know how.

i,ll tell you who fell over on monday, the little shit up quorn rd who hit my 7 yr old smack in the kisser with a snowball, after he was warned not to. i don,t think he expected a guardian reader to pelt after him and put the business end of a dm, into his poo harbour, if only i,d been wearing my sandle and sock combo.

I took my dog out on Dawson Hill on Sunday night when the snow started and he got over-excited chasing snowballs and stuff so banged into me like a steam train and knocked my legs out from under me! I landed on my @rse with a massive thud and my old man laughed his t!ts off.


I was fairly happy when he slipped on his @rse 5 minutes later in front of a load of kids when he didn't spot the mirror-like slide they'd made on the path down from the flats.

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> I was fairly happy when he slipped on his @rse 5

> minutes later in front of a load of kids when he

> didn't spot the mirror-like slide they'd made on

> the path down from the flats.


Also known as a happy ending.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
    • Hello! I'm looking for a talented, affordable people photographer to do headshots for my start up's website, for 4 people. If you're keen I'd love to see examples of your work please. Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...