Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just read this in this months 'Southwark Life.'


"More than ?42,000 was awarded to the East Dulwich crime reduction fund, a joint initiative with the police's safer neighbourhoods team It has paid for a range of measures including alert boxes for businesses around Lordship Lane and personal alarms for local people. It is also funding hand held metal detectors to help the police combat the carrying of knives plus traffic calming measures and neighbourhood watch signs."


Has anyone heard anything about this?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5199-cash-to-make-east-dulwich-safer/
Share on other sites

To use someone's amazingly thin argument from another thread:


'if that's what colour they are, how am I being racistzzz' ?


My point in my original post is that, like it or not, ED is a massively white, middle-class, professional area by demographic.


Statistically one of the lowest areas for crime in comparison with the rest of south London.


But if there's one thing that demographic has a lot of, it's abject fear of being a victim of crime, even though statistically they're in one of the the lowest-risk groups.


So yes, what an excellent use of money.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just because money is being spent on ED, it

> doesn't mean that more money isn't being spent

> elsewhere.

>

> Honk, do you think ?42k is a lot of money? Really?



Not knowing anything about what is spent on other areas, I don't know.


I just hope it is a mere fraction of what is spent on other areas is all.

Exactly... we don't know the facts. But it certainly doesn't sound like a lot of money to me.


Totally agree that more money should be spent where the need is greater. But just because SE22 is possibly a safer-than-average area, doesn't mean no money should be spent at all.

Otto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> my DNA forensic property marking kit arrived

> yesterday. i am in love with it.


Me too. I got mine a couple of weeks ago and have been going mad with it marking anything that is moveable.


I have even done myself in case my frozen body is found in a London blizzard and needs returning home safely.


In regard to the thread. I agree that budgets should be weighted to areas that most need the resources, but that does not mean that other areas should be excluded because they are "well off" or "middle class." As recent threads highlight; ED is not exactly a crime free utopia.

?42k.

That covers the cost of one full time (35 hrs a week) Community officer to cover plus some stickers to put in our windows. Put another way, ?42k is the average income of a burglar in SE22.


BTW one survery states SE22 is 35% black or Asian. I would say that is a very mixed racial group and apparently we are middle income, middle educated and middle ranking professionally. Pretty average eh?!

Good idea then what I will do is convince a bunch of people to give a bunch of other people lots of stuff on the grounds that I will be giving those people sticks to pay for it with. I?ve got them, I promise, every time I break one in half it doubles in value. Sorted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do they require a direct debit?
    • There seems to be a change in the reception staff - did not recognise a couple of them when I last visited.  Not sure whether one of the long term staff has retired as not seen her for a while.  Used on line facility as my podiatrist recommended antibiotics for a toe infection and also took photo of my toe which I attached yo my request. Got a message back within a day to say medication ordered from chemist. 
    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...