Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Am sure I've seen a thread on this somewhere before but just wanted to say that Tosh was cycling home through the Surrey Canal area on Friday night and he was set upon by a group of six blokes. Fortunately, despite them kicking him in the leg to try to get him off his bicycle, Tosh managed to stay on and get past them without further incident. He parked over and watched as the group tried to get a second cyclist off his bikee, by which time Tosh was phoning the police. The second cyclist also got through and the group went for a third cyclist, again with no luck, and apparently fled. The police did come and take a report. Just another warning to all who cycle this way to be very careful, perhaps cycle in pairs? Also, Friday night apparently the worst!

Shosh

It's very dangerous along Surrey canal at night-time, and would urge everyone never ever to cycle through there during darkness. During the day it is well populated but keep your antennae on for any suspicious trouble. If in doubt, turn back and take the 63 bus route. Was whoever was attacked attacked at night-time?
I had my hand broken in a similar attack to this a few years ago. A group of youths were wacking cyclists with large branches as they passed. I parried a blow with my hand and broke a knuckle even with motorbike gloves on. Reported to police, but not sure what action was taken. Sad to hear this is still going on.
I think you'd have to conclude it's just not worth the risk of riding in this area, especially after dark, and even in groups. Whilst i haven't been attacked directly, I've had things thrown at me on a number of occasions in this area, so avoid it like the plague these days.

Thanks for the warning. It does seem that this particular route home is lethal.

Do you know what time this happened?

I go home this way everyday but will never use the Canal path after dark and use Trafalgar/Sumner Roads instead. They are a bit bumpy but otherwise fine.

Roll on Springtime and a bit more light in the evenings

I've cycled through there, daily, for the best part of 3 years.


It's a combination of luck and common sense.


If you're not confident going down there as someone says use the 63 route, but if someone's going to take you off your bike they're going to do it anywhere.

I am horrified by this. Poor Tosh. I think that none of us should ever go to Peckham, not ever. Indeed, I am about to pen a letter to my MP insisting that the whole of Dulwich become a gated community.


Perhaps we could have some kind of electric wiring type of arrangement constructed. I hear that the building of ten foot walls can be expensive.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am horrified by this. Poor Tosh. I think that

> none of us should ever go to Peckham, not ever.

> Indeed, I am about to pen a letter to my MP

> insisting that the whole of Dulwich become a gated

> community.

>

> Perhaps we could have some kind of electric wiring

> type of arrangement constructed. I hear that the

> building of ten foot walls can be expensive.



I imagine the residents of Peckham are already WAY ahead of you in getting this fast-tracked through.


A massive great flyover from East Dulwich Road to Brixton would be a nice addition.

Funnily enough, I attended jury service last year on a similar case where attacks were happening on cyclists using the canal in Hackney. Police kept a watch and caught the three lads involved. Can't see why they couldn't do something similar here if it's happening regularly. There shouldn't be no-go areas - and if we all avoid it presumably the attackers will just move somewhere else to rob people.

No Description?


Plagued by this in one area of Bristol I was reading the other night where 2 main gangs are involved, apparently.

In Bristol there is a clear description of Members of the 2 Gangs who are racially diverse so it is "relatively" easy for the cyclists there to be additionally vigilant.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am horrified by this. Poor Tosh. I think that

> none of us should ever go to Peckham, not ever.

> Indeed, I am about to pen a letter to my MP

> insisting that the whole of Dulwich become a gated

> community.

>

> Perhaps we could have some kind of electric wiring

> type of arrangement constructed. I hear that the

> building of ten foot walls can be expensive.


They've built a "Protective wall" around Israel...lets use the proposed Zebra crossing money to build a wall around ED!

fractionater Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dulwichmum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I am horrified by this. Poor Tosh. I think

> that

> > none of us should ever go to Peckham, not ever.

>

> > Indeed, I am about to pen a letter to my MP

> > insisting that the whole of Dulwich become a

> gated

> > community.

> >

> > Perhaps we could have some kind of electric

> wiring

> > type of arrangement constructed. I hear that

> the

> > building of ten foot walls can be expensive.

>

> They've built a "Protective wall" around

> Israel...lets use the proposed Zebra crossing

> money to build a wall around ED!


Er... And then begin shelling from the other side?

JamesG Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> where is Surrey Canal?



The bit probably being referred to here (it used to run all the way to the Thames) runs up the side of Peckham library up to the Old Kent Road. It's since been filled in but you can still see remnants of a towpath.


As with all areas of London at night, it is recommended you exercise caution and common sense. And also that you're more likely to be hit by a car than attacked down there.

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am horrified by this. Poor Tosh. I think that

> none of us should ever go to Peckham, not ever.

> Indeed, I am about to pen a letter to my MP

> insisting that the whole of Dulwich become a gated

> community.

>

> Perhaps we could have some kind of electric wiring

> type of arrangement constructed. I hear that the

> building of ten foot walls can be expensive.



Am I missing something?

fractionater Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Er... And then begin shelling from the other

> side?"

>

>

> Crush them....Resolve the Peckham problem once and

> for all!



Nothing quite so vulgar dear boy. We should be much more civil and relocate the populace en mass towards the estuary. I believe the Soviets did something similar with mixed results. In short always move the problem elsewhere.

jon


Well there is a question! I think so but I know others that don't. I think an exaggerated version of the stereotypical Dulwich Village-living, high-earning-partner-marrying, lady of lunch who has no concept of reality beyond her provileged borders is ripe for humour and I think she hits the target as often as not


But if casual readers of the forum don't know that, then it just appears crass and offensive which I think is a shame

If you're not confident going down there as someone says use the 63 route, but if someone's going to take you off your bike they're going to do it anywhere.


Rubbish - the reason they use the Surrey Canal is because (a) it's darker and therefore easier to hide, (b) they're less likely to get caught and © it's regularly used by cyclists. I don't imagine the same group go about knocking cyclists off their bikes on the Walworth Road for example.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jon

>

> Well there is a question! I think so but I know

> others that don't. I think an exaggerated version

> of the stereotypical Dulwich Village-living,

> high-earning-partner-marrying, lady of lunch who

> has no concept of reality beyond her provileged

> borders is ripe for humour and I think she hits

> the target as often as not

>

> But if casual readers of the forum don't know

> that, then it just appears crass and offensive

> which I think is a shame



Sean

Thanks for explaining that - the voice of conciliatory reason as always.

Though I'm afraid to say that I remain to be convinced that this is funny.

Each to his or her of course.

Jon


Edited because I'm not

well in this instance


a) I happen to know the guy attacked on this thread

b) I also know someone close to dulwichmum

c) I like Peckham and normally defend it against people (looking at you Louisa!) who because of some very-visible problems dismiss the whole place as vile, when there are many, many reasons to like Peckham


so of course I'm conciliatory on this one. But "always"??? a leeeeeeeetle bit of a stretch no?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
    • Looking for crate/toys/play pen etc. Ideally will buy in a bundle. Can collect!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...