Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Raquel Cruz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A big lounge with delightful refreshments served

> throughout the day... where the forumites can keep

> up with their postings...

>

> Masks will be provided.

>

> FACT


Yes, yes but will there be a Wimpy bar Franchise?

Will they serve Benders and Chocolate Bowlers?

Well, go on Giggi, it's over to you.

You were staring at the ceiling. Moos introduced the high-powered water pistols motif.

It's this sort of stuff that could get you a column in Loaded you know.

Column? Lord only knows what you two'll make of that.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What we need to ask ourselves in this situation is

> this. What would Princess Anne do?


According to Ted, she'd frown like you. While a young Judy Dench was your smiling lady-in-waiting.

But, neither of you were ever seen in the same room together. Uncanny.

I don't know how Ted does it, but he do.

Ted and I posted above at the same time.

It looks as though when you put the two posts together, that maybe there was an implication that a liason might have taken place between the Princess Royal and a lady-in-waiting.

I mean go back and look at it.

Ted, 'turn that frown upside down'? With a previous mention of Dame Judy Dench smiling? There's only one way that's going to be heading.

Ted, I've enjoyed your company, but I'm pretty certain there are still laws about treason, and I reckon this is as treasoness as it gets.

Jesus, even Lord Haw-Haw never went this far, and they hanged him.

If you're looking in Your Majesty, I remain your loyal servant, that stuff I said in your son's pub (you know The Prince's Head) about being a republican and reckoning that your London home would bring in more 'invisible exports' as a Wetherspoons was nothing more than the drink talking.

Queen Elizabeth II. As I typed I bowed. I think that proves my loyalty.

But, Elizabeth Regina, ir I may call you that, there are those amongst us who may seek to do you down, and if anyone should end up in the Tower Of London (as a captive rather than a day visitor) then you might want to put your people onto a certain person, whose details can be found above.

And Ma'm, if I may say, well done for staying in and not allowing the second to the throne access.

If it please you M'am, I'm in agreement with your husband that your heir might well be a 'big-eared namby-pamby c*ntbollox', though his remarks about Chinese people still make me uncomfortable.

Unles of course that's treasoness? If it is, then 'slitty-eyed' all the way.

I remain your humble, obedient, humble and loyal servant in humility.

You know, like that Paul Burrell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
    • Worth calling ahead as sometimes they can’t accept large donations
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...