Jump to content

Recommended Posts

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In a way this is connected to the con woman

> thread. A lot of you have encountered the female

> scam artist. How many of you ladies have

> encountered the Local Lothario? He runs a local

> business on Lordship Lane.


xxxxxxx


Are we talking Goose Green end? If so, probably yes.

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In a way this is connected to the con woman

> thread. A lot of you have encountered the female

> scam artist. How many of you ladies have

> encountered the Local Lothario? He runs a local

> business on Lordship Lane.


You're not referring to the sleazes who access the laptops of ladies using their "free wifi" are you? But there are more than one of them on Lordship Lane. I did not realise that if you are using the cafe/bar's wifi you can then be on their local network and they can then access your laptop. Silly really.

snoozequeen1 wrote:


You're not referring to the sleazes who access the laptops of ladies using their "free wifi" are you? But there are more than one of them on Lordship Lane. I did not realise that if you are using the cafe/bar's wifi you can then be on their local network and they can then access your laptop

snip<


If you go to one of the wifi places you should turn off file and printer sharing and enable the firewall if you use windows. and if your wifi at home is on a unique workgroup other than the default ones. noone can connect to your machine.


It's easy when you know how.......

Hi red devil and Mickecg, unfortunately Asset's right, and the 'allegedly' isn't defence. Only 'fair comment' and legal proof are defences. Neither are applicable in this situation, and it's highly defamatory.


I don't think you guys were regulars when the Forum had its last run in with libel, and it gets very messy very quickly.


May I volunteer that you could go back and edit your posts to avoid any mention of anything that could identify the chap? Even cryptic identification is a no-no. If you can tell who he is by any means, then we all go down.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh dear, Angelina - get ready for the pile-on!
    • I wonder if we haven't been suitably offended - did we miss  a trick in allowing the OP to call her a woman - perhaps the person identifies as gender fluid (or other) and is offended.
    • Would you have jumped down the OP's throat if they'd described the perp as white, 50s, male?  How we morphed from a hurried post about a shop-lifter, to rampant racism, migrants and single mothers, I do not know.  And I thought the thread about hot dogs was hysterical....
    • Yes tell the police..give them a description… what is the case for describing here, it’s irrelevant information. What’s the percentage of people in ED fitting that description. I’m sure the Daily Mail thinks all the irrelevant information about ‘migrants’ , ‘single mothers’  ‘etc etc is ‘fine’. Once on social media it instantly affects what people think and that’s the issue. It matters.    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jun/27/black-children-arrested-london-more-likely-criminalised-than-white-children
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...