Jump to content

Local Lothario (Lounged)

FelicityNormal

By FelicityNormal
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

FelicityNormal

FelicityNormal

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Judging from PMs I have received today, the leading married-shopkeeper-lothario has shagged 3 women on EDF and 2 others that I know in the neighbourhood who do not post on EDF. He has told each of these women that he is single and seeking a longterm relationship. For reasons as yet unknown (but soon to be uncovered, I am sure) he is very unwilling to wear condoms and has been known to remove a condom in the heat of passion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

BBW, red devil?


Not really. I just try and imagine a 'reasonable' case, and I don't think a butcher joke is in the same league as an allegation of sexual impropriety. We all rely on each other to catch ourselves if we're sailing close to the wind. I thank you for the reminder!


On that note, we'd probably better amend your note at the top of this page!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

postmodern Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He is very good in bed.


I'm sure.

But didn't his getting up immediately afterwards and returning home to the wife and kids* he said he didn't have take some of the bloom off the afterglow?


*I should of course have said that he got dressed between getting up and returning home.

I don't know the fellow or his missus, but even Mary Archer wouldn't have put up with Jeffrey arriving home stark bollock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> But I never got chatted up much even pre-Moosling,

> I'm too scary. Sigh...


Oh Moos, don't be upset, I can't bear it.

Rest assured if you were a customer in a shop I owned, I'd have given you a dose of the clap for sure.

Now don't you be lettin' that Flick and PostModern be gettin' all up in your face thinkin' they're all that.

You go girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dulwich Born And Bred

Dulwich Born And Bred

Posted
Posted

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moos Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > But I never got chatted up much even

> pre-Moosling,

> > I'm too scary. Sigh...

>

> Oh Moos, don't be upset, I can't bear it.

> Rest assured if you were a customer in a shop I

> owned, I'd have given you a dose of the clap for

> sure.

> Now don't you be lettin' that Flick and PostModern

> be gettin' all up in your face thinkin' they're

> all that.

> You go girl.



PMSL! That gave me a good old belly laugh! Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LegalEagle-ish

LegalEagle-ish

Posted
Posted

This made me laugh - I want to know who the sleazy, scummy clap spreader is - not cos I was thinking of giving him one - but just so I can walk past with a knowing smirk.


By the way if the guy isn't named, or you give him a nickname like clapper slapper or something, then you can't be done for libel unless you stick his pic up or something.


Here is a very interesting bit of rubbish I was reading from somewhere and I think it's pretty accurate:


You can't defame nicknames when people don't know who they are.


So, if you spread the same Dyke TV licence allegations but called him Big Beardo McFluffy, he can't sue, even if he knows you are referring to him - unless other people know him by the same nickname.


On the internet the rules are exactly the same. There are no special internet defences. The only advantage is that web sites tend to have a smaller number of users, (so less people see it hence it's less defamatory so it's rarely worth the bother of going to court) and allegations can be removed promptly on protest from a defamed party.


On the web, the writer, the web site owner and the ISP can all be sued just like the writer, the magazine and the distributor in the print field. A link could also be potentially defamatory if you are linking to defamatory material.


There is also a defence of 'fair comment' which is somewhat vague but is basically there to stop someone being sued for saying they don't like Marks & Spencer or McDonalds or Piers Morgan.


You are allowed to say that - even if you were a famous star or a very persuasive writer and it could damage them financially. That's the law.


However libel does not extend to the dead. Nor is being abusive libelous.


So I can say "Keith Moon was a smackhead lover of the highest order" and it's no problem. In fact I could say "every human who ever existed was a smack dealing, gun running, uncle fucker."


This is completely okay. That's UK libel!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • LivinSaarfMan
      GALA 2024

      By LivinSaarfMan · Posted

      I’m not a Southwark council stooge I’m a city drone working for the man in the square mile… I’ve been an East Dulwich resident from 2007. I lost access to my previous account  my new account is from 2012 as mentioned.  its unbelievably narrow minded to think that there is no local support for the festival. I would say that 8/10 of my local friends do.  OK they/we are the types that like a party. The two that  are mildly annoyed are dog walkers who do moan about having to use the other side of the park… but again they don’t hate it.  I take the point that although only 3 days of noise,  access to the park is restricted for longer but there is another mooosive bit of grass right next to it that people can use … ie the Rye common part of the park.  I feel London’s open spaces should be for everyone EVEN  those that like to listen music and dance in the open air. AND those that want to use it for quiet contemplation.  I would also like to highlight that nightclubs and venues  across UK are under pressure and closing at a shocking rate. A large event like this not only supports the artists playing and the  ‘scene. ’  It also provides traffic and income at local south London venues used for pre and post events/ drinking.  We should all be proud of the musical culture the UK  has to offer  and in particular it’s leading contribution to electronic dance music. There needs to be more  support for the reducing number of venues and events.   
    • Mabaker
      Leash Laws not being obeyed in Dulwich Park

      By Mabaker · Posted

      I'm sorry to hear about your little puppy being bitten. I hope s/he is ok. On another note I would be grateful if people generally don't use the name Karen negatively in posts. This Karen finds it rather hurtful.
    • Sue
      ED Nature Watch

      By Sue · Posted

      A perfectly healthy looking tree in our road was recently removed, and apparently it was because it had diseased roots. Who knows how this was discovered!
    • Sue
      CHERN Thai Cafe Re-opening!

      By Sue · Posted

      Hooray!

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...