Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I read with interest the recent column inches in the Daily Mail on Jacqui Smiths residency in the area and their report on the increase in crime levels in the area despite her residency and police protection. As I live nearby, it amused me that they say she resides in Peckham, when it fact it is Nunhead. Due to the SE15 post code shared by both, I can understand their confusion. I think it is positive that someone of her government level lives in the area. Yes there are armed police that cost the taxpayer to guard her house, but if this area is so bad, would she be here?!! Where do these crime figures come from that the DM quote? It ain't that bad living in the area...honest! Lets start promoting Nunhead, Peckham and surrounding areas such as ED in a more positive light. I get fed up having to re-assure relatives and friends north of Watford that it is safe to walk down the streets without getting shot, because tabloids like the DM portray it that way. Yes there is crime, but unfortunately it's everywhere.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5274-jaqui-smith-in-daily-mail/
Share on other sites

But these areas aren't safe! And well we all know it!


I still don't understand why some sort of 'limiter' can't be applied to Oyster cards, whereby if the holder of said card stays on the 12 bus (for example) beyond the first stop on Barry Road (another example), the bus is forced to a halt until the perpetrator alights the bus.


It would stop a lot of 'cross border crime' and can't be that difficult to implement, can it? If the cost is an issue then the deficit should be met with an increase in SE22 area council tax.

Honk: Am I on time?:))


For the 7,000th Time its all about SCALE AND PROPORTION!


I'm sick of this bland "crime occurs in all areas" disingenuity.


Yes! There WAS a murder in The Orkney Islands last year, the first in 24 years but it DID occur.


The Police used to be able to publish Mobile Phone Thefts/Assaults before they were stopped in the interest of "Community Relations".

The last annual figures( now swept right under the Axminster!) shower 175,000 Thefts, Borough by Borough(All 33)...and Yes there was, at least ONE theft in every Borough but that does not really tell the story does it?:)



He/she does rather enjoy wandering into somwehere, pointing a finger and shouting "WHAT a BUNCH of arseholes!!" rather loudly it seems


But the more we point that out the more we probably re-enforce the opinion. But I'm really not sure what he/she gets out of coming here

The only reason she lives in Nunhead is because she's staying at her sister's place. She can pay her a low rent, while claiming expenses for her family home in Redditch.


It's not so difficult to find crime figures for various areas in London... Peckham definitely does have more than it's fair share of crimes, not sure about Nunhead though.

The thing with honk is, loads of people would, and do, agree with his basic points, and many people have complained about the same things on here since the site opened.


It's just with honk, he does it with all the righteous commitment of a 15 year old who's just read his first Bob Geldof interview. Nobody else has ever thought of this stuff, man. Only honk knows the way.


Also, he doesn't seem to have anything else to say. Which is a shame, because elsewhere he's an amusing poster.

honk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Cue a bunch of predicable sneering snobs posting

> drivel regarding the areas you mention. *sets

> watch*



I would rather have expected a bunch of predicable [sic] sneering snobs posting drivel regarding the paper you mention. Starting with me. SusyQ, to echo what Mark said, stop reading the Mail. But I'll go further, educate your friends and family that there are real NEWSpapers out there, and hey presto, everyone will want to move to Peckham for its vibrant multiculturalism and lovely big houses.

I have lived in the same flat 25 years. It is on the SE15 side of Peckham Rye Park. When I was younger and naive and impressionable I used to tell people I lived near East Dulwich and that was even before East Dulwich was the East Dulwich it is now. Then I "came out" and said I live in Peckham Rye (adding the "Rye", as "Peckham Rye" forms the second line of my address after the number and block). I now find I live in Nunhead.

When I lived in East Dulwich there was not much crime in this road.

When I lived in Peckham Rye there was a murder nearby.

Since I have lived in Nunhead there has not been much crime at all and the local Police Ward Panel often report this fact that this is one of the better wards (crime-wise) to live. (Though it may be up'd a bit if all of you lot who report crimes you know about on here, reported them to the police (and I do not know if you bother)).

In terms of actual percentages, the majority of those figures have a negligible difference. Certainly not significant to warrant the cacophony of snobbish tutting on here.


the violence against the person figure is considerably higher, though as I imagine the majority of you don't run in gangs or live on a sink estate then your chances of that happening are diminished anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...