Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I'm a mother, she isn't.


I'm a mother too, Moos. A bad mother. And how that beeyatch even begin to be putting her face near your bidness?

She think she cool? Tell that hoochie she cool like muthaf*ckin' Coolio, cool. Ha.

We OGs gotta roll together. Word.

The problem has to do with generalisation pure and simple - nothing to do with prams/boobs/nappies/drivers etc. Its not what you say it's the way that you say it. Some posters have a penchant for headlines that would book them a place on the editorial team of any tabloid. Type the inflamatory line and click "post Message". Sit back and enjoy.
Just watch out for me, come August I will be having one of those big bright prams! I apologise for anyones' ankles I might crash into, but got to do some posing with the pram!:)) and I PROMISE not to stop the pram in the middle of the pavement to chat about flexi tots nappies with my friend!

All that puzzles me about prams/buggies is that they used to be fairly small things that were easily folded up and didn't take up lots of room, got onto buses without problems and now many of them are the equivalent of a 4x4. Do people really go hiking over fields with their buggy that they need all these huge tyres that stick a foot out from the body of the buggy and are the bits that crack off ankles and block shop aisles?


Now what does look like fun and what I regret wasn't invented when my little sis came along were the buggy boards. ;-)

Some people are less aware of their personal space than others: some of those people might be parents with buggies and then again some of them are people sans buggies standing in the middle of the aisle at Sainsburys, or are leery drunk peeps at 2am outside the kebab shop all over the pavement or not moving down the platform on the tube. The point is this is life and that for some, life with a pram and all the baby faff that goes with it, you are more cumbersome than you used to be with just your William Rose shopping bag and the pavements are not huge, and sniff sniff, life is so hard...


Just gotta learn to live with each other maybe, if that's errr not too hard or idealistic. Yep - boobs are out everywhere to feed darling babies as we're constantly being told breast is best and as someone pointed out, why should mothers stay at home for 6 months. I agree totally that pooey nappies on tables, sofas, bars, on my head is unacceptable. But that's another story of course...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
    • Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...