Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I always thought she was from Wandsworth? For the very same reasons Katie Hopkins (also in the house) dislikes her, I find her equally annoying. She has been supporting a fellow housemate called Perez Hilton (some sort of US columnist/blogger) who's been deeply disingenuous and annoying. Nadia dislikes Katie so much, and yet rarely confronts her to her face. But more than happy to have a rant behind her back. Really gets my back up.


Louisa.

Just remembered I met Nadia Sawalha at a book launch years ago and she seemed very nice and down to earth to me. Haven't seen the programme but I'm sure if I were confined in a house with Katie Hopkins I wouldn't bother confronting her either as she's so aggressive and always has to have the last word, so no chance of any genuine discussion.

Katie Hopkins from what I've seen says what she thinks to a persons face, whether you agree with that or not. Nadia Sawahla tells everyone she does that and get is consistently bitching about Hopkins behind her back on camera. If she has wanted to come across as some sort of loveable peace maker she's failed miserably, because I just see her as a nasty person who bitches about people but never to their face.


Louisa.

I agree with Louisa. I think she has let herself down badly in this programme. She wasn't prepared to give Katie Hopkins the benefit of the doubt, although others have and actually like her. She teamed up with the very bitchy Perez Hilton, an american that told others " She's the most hated woman in Britain" (Hopkins), well maybe us British should decide that.


At last night's eviction she was booed when her name was called out. I predict her to be the next one out and that her friendship with Perez Hilton will end at that moment.

camberwell70 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What hair?



We are talking about Nadia Sawahla, are we not? So, Nadia Sawahla's hair. If you want to be contrary camberwell70, I would suggest that are many things you could choose to argue. The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need clarity), can only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the 18th century. Her personality matches said hair.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always thought she was from Wandsworth? For the

> very same reasons Katie Hopkins (also in the

> house) dislikes her, I find her equally annoying.

> She has been supporting a fellow housemate called

> Perez Hilton (some sort of US columnist/blogger)

> who's been deeply disingenuous and annoying. Nadia

> dislikes Katie so much, and yet rarely confronts

> her to her face.


But more than happy to have a

> rant behind her back.


Really gets my back up.

>

> Louisa.


"But more than happy to have a rant behind her back"


Pots and kettles i'm thinking here - Ha ha!

speedbird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need clarity), can

> only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the 18th

> century. Her personality matches said hair.


Ooh, bitchy. The very curly hair is probably due to her North African heritage rather than her state of mind, no?

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> speedbird Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need

> clarity), can

> > only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the

> 18th

> > century. Her personality matches said hair.

>

> Ooh, bitchy. The very curly hair is probably due

> to her North African heritage rather than her

> state of mind, no?


RPC, you are probably right, a bitch I may be(in this case). She (NS), incites rage in me. And the hair is just plain old, out of control frizzy hair. The sister (Julia) is clearly able to tame hers.... I rest.


Quite funny though... Big Brother.

I think she's aggressive. I think Perez is exceptionally annoying but he seems fairly harmless. She's gunning for him, saying nasty things behind his back and I don't like bullies. It looks like his aggressiveness towards her was in retaliation. This is the first episode I've seen so I don't really understand what he's done to deserve such hatred. Maybe I've missed something. It just seems she's spent the entire episode being quite nasty to him.

Phobic I suggest you have a glance back at this seasons earlier episodes. Perez Hilton forced one of the housemates to leave the house due to constant attention seeking and vulgar behaviour. Katie Hopkins was rather refrained from communication with him until this particular event occurred which forced out one of the lowliest people in the house. Perez has been back stabbing and manipulative throughout the show and is clearly on a mission to use his attention seeking to win the entire thing. Hopkins has not once back stabbed anyone, she's been consistently true to what she thinks about people including Nadia Sawahla to her face.


Louisa.

Ok - I'll take your word for it as I'm definitely not going to watch the episodes back! If he has acted in a way that forced someone to leave I guess it makes a bit more sense. That would explain why she's been so aggressive and nasty to him. Constantly bitching and saying horrible things behind his back, and to his face... I found it uncomfortable to watch. Almost as uncomfortable as him. He's really annoying!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am struggling to understand how Green policies translate to local issues? The Southwark Greens leaflet I received reads like a general wish list but is not locally specific. I know the same can be said of other political parties. What specifically are Greens plans for housing, protecting local parks, council tax, transport and roads/ pavement upkeep, CPZ/LTNs?
    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...