Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I always thought she was from Wandsworth? For the very same reasons Katie Hopkins (also in the house) dislikes her, I find her equally annoying. She has been supporting a fellow housemate called Perez Hilton (some sort of US columnist/blogger) who's been deeply disingenuous and annoying. Nadia dislikes Katie so much, and yet rarely confronts her to her face. But more than happy to have a rant behind her back. Really gets my back up.


Louisa.

Just remembered I met Nadia Sawalha at a book launch years ago and she seemed very nice and down to earth to me. Haven't seen the programme but I'm sure if I were confined in a house with Katie Hopkins I wouldn't bother confronting her either as she's so aggressive and always has to have the last word, so no chance of any genuine discussion.

Katie Hopkins from what I've seen says what she thinks to a persons face, whether you agree with that or not. Nadia Sawahla tells everyone she does that and get is consistently bitching about Hopkins behind her back on camera. If she has wanted to come across as some sort of loveable peace maker she's failed miserably, because I just see her as a nasty person who bitches about people but never to their face.


Louisa.

I agree with Louisa. I think she has let herself down badly in this programme. She wasn't prepared to give Katie Hopkins the benefit of the doubt, although others have and actually like her. She teamed up with the very bitchy Perez Hilton, an american that told others " She's the most hated woman in Britain" (Hopkins), well maybe us British should decide that.


At last night's eviction she was booed when her name was called out. I predict her to be the next one out and that her friendship with Perez Hilton will end at that moment.

camberwell70 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What hair?



We are talking about Nadia Sawahla, are we not? So, Nadia Sawahla's hair. If you want to be contrary camberwell70, I would suggest that are many things you could choose to argue. The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need clarity), can only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the 18th century. Her personality matches said hair.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always thought she was from Wandsworth? For the

> very same reasons Katie Hopkins (also in the

> house) dislikes her, I find her equally annoying.

> She has been supporting a fellow housemate called

> Perez Hilton (some sort of US columnist/blogger)

> who's been deeply disingenuous and annoying. Nadia

> dislikes Katie so much, and yet rarely confronts

> her to her face.


But more than happy to have a

> rant behind her back.


Really gets my back up.

>

> Louisa.


"But more than happy to have a rant behind her back"


Pots and kettles i'm thinking here - Ha ha!

speedbird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need clarity), can

> only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the 18th

> century. Her personality matches said hair.


Ooh, bitchy. The very curly hair is probably due to her North African heritage rather than her state of mind, no?

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> speedbird Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need

> clarity), can

> > only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the

> 18th

> > century. Her personality matches said hair.

>

> Ooh, bitchy. The very curly hair is probably due

> to her North African heritage rather than her

> state of mind, no?


RPC, you are probably right, a bitch I may be(in this case). She (NS), incites rage in me. And the hair is just plain old, out of control frizzy hair. The sister (Julia) is clearly able to tame hers.... I rest.


Quite funny though... Big Brother.

I think she's aggressive. I think Perez is exceptionally annoying but he seems fairly harmless. She's gunning for him, saying nasty things behind his back and I don't like bullies. It looks like his aggressiveness towards her was in retaliation. This is the first episode I've seen so I don't really understand what he's done to deserve such hatred. Maybe I've missed something. It just seems she's spent the entire episode being quite nasty to him.

Phobic I suggest you have a glance back at this seasons earlier episodes. Perez Hilton forced one of the housemates to leave the house due to constant attention seeking and vulgar behaviour. Katie Hopkins was rather refrained from communication with him until this particular event occurred which forced out one of the lowliest people in the house. Perez has been back stabbing and manipulative throughout the show and is clearly on a mission to use his attention seeking to win the entire thing. Hopkins has not once back stabbed anyone, she's been consistently true to what she thinks about people including Nadia Sawahla to her face.


Louisa.

Ok - I'll take your word for it as I'm definitely not going to watch the episodes back! If he has acted in a way that forced someone to leave I guess it makes a bit more sense. That would explain why she's been so aggressive and nasty to him. Constantly bitching and saying horrible things behind his back, and to his face... I found it uncomfortable to watch. Almost as uncomfortable as him. He's really annoying!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...