Jump to content

The Clockhouse Pub - weekend chaos


onthemove123

Recommended Posts

After I emailed Young?s Brewery on Monday, I have today received an email from their Area Manager and the following has now been implemented:


Staff have been warned not to throw/smash bottles in to the recycling bin


No reservations are allowed in the front bar, only the restaurant.


And the best news ? CHILDREN ARE NOW BANNED from the Front Bar.


Thanks!

I'd ban most people who aren't drinkers from the main bar. No food, no children, no yummies hogging a mug of decaf coffee for two hours, no loud knobs with rugger shirts on shouting across the bar, no one who's doesn't drink a minimum of a pint every hour (and that's generous). God I would make a great landlord.


Louisa.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nothing they have ever done will be as bad as what

> they did to the Double Locks in Exeter



OMG.


What have they done to the Double Locks?


I used to go there a lot in the mid eighties.


ETA: Just realised I was thinking of that other pub on the canal near Countess Weir. Went there more than the Double Locks. Can't remember its name. Did go to the Double Locks sometimes too though ....

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd ban most people who aren't drinkers from the

> main bar. No food, no children, no yummies hogging

> a mug of decaf coffee for two hours, no loud knobs

> with rugger shirts on shouting across the bar, no

> one who's doesn't drink a minimum of a pint every

> hour (and that's generous). God I would make a

> great landlord.




I'd drink in your pub!

a quick google of "double locks shame" gives a taste of what happened Sue


Was the other one you mention the Turf Locks?



The Double Locks - a perenially busy, rambling, ramshackle pub, CAMRA winner, great food, camping in the garden in the summer, a great mix of people, real fires


And now a Youngs pub serving overpriced awful food, limited beers by staff who don't know what beers are on or how to serve - and no camping, fires or atmosphere

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd drink in your pub!


I probably would too! Nice to have options... places you can go with the kids for a spot of lunch, and other places free of buggies and crying babies. Preferably no loud knobs with rugby shirts in either.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd ban most people who aren't drinkers from the

> main bar. No food, no children, no yummies hogging

> a mug of decaf coffee for two hours, no loud knobs

> with rugger shirts on shouting across the bar, no

> one who's doesn't drink a minimum of a pint every

> hour (and that's generous). God I would make a

> great landlord.

>

> Louisa.


Cash only :)

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'd drink in your pub!

>

> I probably would too! Nice to have options...

> places you can go with the kids for a spot of

> lunch, and other places free of buggies and crying

> babies. Preferably no loud knobs with rugby shirts

> in either.


That last comment suggests to me that loud knobs must aspire to be like rugby fans.

  • 2 weeks later...

Otta wrote:


"You've always been able to take kids to the pub."


Otta, you are wrong. I don't know what age you are but my grand-kids had to play outside the Dulwich Woodhouse as kids were not allowed in the bar area until they reached the age of 14. This was pub rules at the time, which is some 17 years ago. So I guess maybe you are young enough not to be aware of this.


Just wish the same rules applied now!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.   
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
    • Still on the look out for CDs and vinyl.. around all weekend 
    • I suggest phoning before you go. I'm going to. It seems to be  only a small place and closed every morning, plus if it's only  one person they might  have to close the shop unexpectedly at other times.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...