Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That does sound outrageous and I've signed the petition.


However, I also looked at the DPG website, which lists 34 members of staff, only two of whom look like they might be in the team involved, so I assume there are more who are not listed plus existing volunteers. This does look like a large staff for a relatively small gallery, but if all the positions are needed they should be staffed and paid properly. When you restructure, it's the role that is redundant, so they can't simply bring in less qualified people at a lower rate or it would trigger claims for unfair dismissal.

Nope -

Perfectly legal.


https://www.gov.uk/apprenticeships-guide/pay-and-conditions


Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely they can't bring in people on a wage of

> ?2.73 an hour?

>

> That must be illegal, surely.

>

> Have I missed something?

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That does sound outrageous and I've signed the

> petition.

>

> However, I also looked at the DPG website, which

> lists 34 members of staff, only two of whom look

> like they might be in the team involved,


The gallery attendants aren't pictured.

DPG is hardly an evil multi-national. I suspect money is tight and they are responding as best they can.


Maybe if all this signatories to this petition, rather than just criticise, put their hand in their pocket and became Friends of DPG then perhaps the gallery would have the money to keep things the way they are.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tinky Winky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What makes you think that the signatories aren't

> Friends of DPG?

>

> What makes you think they all are?

Nothing. But i know at least 2 friends that have signed this.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't see a figure for the total actual

> headcount that's at risk. How many people are

> likely to lose their job altogether, and how many

> to be put on new Ts&Cs?


From the Facebook page "Save Jobs at Dulwich Picture Gallery":


Senior Management at Dulwich Picture Gallery propose to make over half of the current visitor services team redundant, as part of the gallery?s cost-cutting programme.19 members of the front-of-house team will face redundancy. Those retaining their jobs will be asked to sign new annualised hours contracts which will force them to work any hours stipulated by management without over-time rates. The expected impact will be a lower annual income for visitor services staff.

Tinky Winky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I can't see a figure for the total actual

> > headcount that's at risk. How many people are

> > likely to lose their job altogether, and how

> many

> > to be put on new Ts&Cs?

>

> From the Facebook page "Save Jobs at Dulwich

> Picture Gallery":

>

> Senior Management at Dulwich Picture Gallery

> propose to make over half of the current visitor

> services team redundant, as part of the gallery?s

> cost-cutting programme.19 members of the

> front-of-house team will face redundancy. Those

> retaining their jobs will be asked to sign new

> annualised hours contracts which will force them

> to work any hours stipulated by management without

> over-time rates. The expected impact will be a

> lower annual income for visitor services staff.


Thanks, Tinky Winky; hadn't seen the actual figure. So if 19 = over half of the team then I guess the total number put at risk would be 30-something? Or is it a team of 19 put at risk and the expected number of redundancies is lower than that?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DPG is hardly an evil multi-national. I suspect

> money is tight and they are responding as best

> they can.

>

> Maybe if all this signatories to this petition,

> rather than just criticise, put their hand in

> their pocket and became Friends of DPG then

> perhaps the gallery would have the money to keep

> things the way they are.


Loz - you've inspired me to both sign the petition AND become a friend of DPG.

I work in a Museum and have done for the past 14 years so seen a fair few general changes across the sector. Yes money is extremely tight in most of them and becoming increasingly so. I don't know the situation here but often staff cuts are the first thing suggested to make savings. Many places have staff cut back to the bone these days.


HP

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz - you've inspired me to both sign the petition AND become a friend of DPG.


I'm pleased, hpsaucey. It's all too easy to sign a petition. Good to see someone willing to put their hand in their pocket as well.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hpsaucey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loz - you've inspired me to both sign the

> petition AND become a friend of DPG.

>

> I'm pleased, hpsaucey. It's all too easy to sign

> a petition. Good to see someone willing to put

> their hand in their pocket as well.


Ta! Very skint pocket lol ....

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone able to put an estimate on how much this

> will save the gallery per annum?


Hard to say based on the available info. Presumably the front-of-house people are majority part-time and/or shift workers, so as a ballpark figure 19 redundancies less any statutory pay-offs - maybe ?200K plus further savings over time due to new Ts&Cs / reduced benefits?


It will be interesting to see how this develops as those who are at risk seem to be members of Unite so will presumably have union backing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years       Looks like Lucy Connolly will me one of those Reform candidates at next election tells you everything you need to know about that party and where the country would be headed 
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...