Jump to content

What doctors surgery would you recommend?


MissLiz

Recommended Posts

mrure26 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've been with Melbourne Grove for some years now

> and it has improved, though I have not had too

> many problems with the surgery overall. The not

> quite on the ball doctors have now gone. On very

> few occasions have I not got a same day

> appointment. Some times it is necessary to keep

> trying the number, especially first thing when

> they open at 8am. If you ring early morning you

> will be given a morning appointment. For

> afternoon appointments, it is necessary to ring

> around mid-day or go there if able to. Compared

> to comments regarding other surgeries in the area,

> I do not think that Melbourne Grove is bad in

> comparison.



Which not quite on the ball doctors have now gone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Melbourne grove medical centre is much better than it used to be although you rarely get to see the same person twice and really have to push for an urgent appointment but once in they are not bad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you enjoy waiting 4 weeks for a routine appointment, being left on hold for 15 minutes each time you call, y our results being lost and the odd snappy, rude receptionist then I highly recommend Forest Hill Road Group Practice.


Such a shame because the doctors are actually great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you enjoy waiting 4 weeks for a routine appointment, being left on hold for 15 minutes each time you call, y our results being lost and the odd snappy, rude receptionist then I highly recommend Forest Hill Road Group Practice.


Not my experience having been a patient there for over a quarter of a century - I have had long waits for an appointment with a (named) doctor over the summer, when the said doctor was on leave, but otherwise seen within 48 hours (or telephone consultation) for anything urgent, normally same day. 'Routine' appointments are the ones which you can (reasonably) wait some time for - it is urgent ('I am actually ill, now') appointments where timeliness is key. Receptionists not rude in my experience, no results lost (for me or the other 3 members of my family). Have had some prescription mix-ups in 25 years, quickly remedied - (mainly one item left off, never the wrong drugs or the wrong strengths prescribed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Penguin. They have recently introduced a duty doctor system where if you feel the problem needs dealing with before you're able to get a routine appointment, the doctor will call back and arrange for an emergency appointment if they feel it appropriate. Have to admit I was very doubtful but can speak from experience that the system does work, and my problem was quickly and effectively treated.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I would agree with Penguin and nxjen. I have also been with Forest Hill Road Group Practice for well over 25 years, and can't speak highly enough of the surgery. In all the years I have been a patient there, I have never found the reception staff to be anything other than polite and helpful, despite them having to put up with some appallingly rude behaviour from some patients. Whilst it's true that you do sometimes have to wait for a while for a routine appointment to see a named doctor, some of whom work part time, there has never been an occasion when I haven't been able to get a same day appointment with one of the doctors if I've needed it. I have always been very happy with the Practice, but since being diagnosed with a life threatening illness in 2011, the treatment I have had has been incredible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

headphonauts Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not much of an exaggeration to say that Dr

> Stephens at The Gardens helped save my life a

> couple of years back. V grateful. Wish it were

> easier to get an appointment though, never sure

> exactly what the drill is...


There's now an online booking system called Patient Access which works wonderfully - no more waiting to get through on the phone. You have to register on their website to use it. More info here: http://www.thegardenssurgery.co.uk/patient-access-booking-appts.html


I've received great service at The Gardens and would recommend it to anyone in the catchment area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just came across this and thought it might be of interest to some:


"The CQC are inspecting a cohort of GP practices in Southwark during April, so if you have any issues relating to any GP practice please let us know so that we can feed into it before the inspection.


Thanks


Sec-Chan Hoong

Healthwatch Southwark Development Officer

d: 020 7358 7005

t: 020 7358 7020

f: 0845 305 2160 | www.healthwatchsouthwark.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obvs it's too far for OP, but I've been really happy with Forest Hill Rd Group practice as well. They have seen both DD and me on the same day via their duty Doctor triage system. Receptionists have been polite and helpful IME, and I don't reckon it's the easiest of jobs.


Oakwood (their midwives) are fabulous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tiger ranks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> NOT THE ONE ON LORDSHIP LANE NEAR THE PLOUGH

> THEY ARE THE WORST POSSIBLE DOCTORS EVER

> from beginning to end its a bad experience


You mean the Lordship Lane Surgery or 306 Medical Centre?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Another vote for the Gardens (if you are in its catchment on Copleston?). All the doctors there are wonderful.


Another thumbs down for Melbourne Grove - never saw the same doctor twice and didn't like many of the ones I did see!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love it that half of The Gardens' catchment area is Peckham Rye Common! I've been with them for years, but I'm just outside the catchment area, on Landcroft Road. I assume this is a recent shrinkage. But even so, prior to that, I was further outside of it, at the far end of Forest Hill Road. Neither time have they prevented me from being registered there. I guess it depends on how many registered patients they have at the time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My experience with Forest Hill Road group practice is that their reception is lousy, but the medical staff on the whole good. However, I've never seen the same person (doctor or nurse) twice, over a period of 14 years.


I say on the whole, as a referral (written document, faxed to the hospital) I was given to Kings was so poor (scrawled, no info) that the staff at Kings said it was the worst they had ever seen and they were quite shocked. They said I should complain to the health trust.


In the past, I've generally found it next to impossible to get an appointment there within 7 days. I was recently (2 months ago) told it would take TEN DAYS merely to speak to a doctor on the phone, for something that was urgent. Last year they told me to go to the Lister for something urgent - where there is a five-hour wait, to see a nurse (the only thing on offer) who cannot prescribe anything (she said). And this after I was told by Forest Hill group practice that the Lister would be able to prescribe what I needed, and that was the only reason I sat there waiting for five hours. I get the impression that they often fob people of by pointing them to the Lister. I have also in the past been told to go to A&E (by a doctor who hadn't seen me) - which turned out to be a bad idea, as I was highly infectious.


Last year I had a mistake made on a prescription they issued, and spent half a day getting that sorted out.


Their NHS website review score is not good - looking at the 63 comments, it's mainly over the issue of non-availability of appointments. And practice staff are spending a not inconsiderable amount of time responding to complaints there (rather than doing something more productive).


I've been meaning to change for a while, when I get a moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...