Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Edited title as the name is now common knowledge.


I think he was given a hard time on a few threads recently. Not surprising he was grumpy!

I've only met him the once but found him to be a nice man.

I'll miss his sense of humour. I'll also miss his presence on the football thread and competing against him in the predictor leagues.


I really hope you come back as someone else AM x

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Giving up the EDF is the easiest thing in the

> world.

> I know because I've done it thousands of times.

>

> Mark Twain


ha ha, excellent. me too, in fact am doing so again.......doh!!!!

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I really hope you come back as someone else AM x


Don't fret Moonster, he'll be back. In the last few weeks he was falling out with all sorts of people over nothing. I think he's had the EDF equivalent of a breakdown, right now he's probably lining up all his tea cups on the window cill so they are just so. Nevermind, just think of all the fun of trying to spot his new reincarnation, number 4 at the last count...

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> am I the last person to realise Alan Medic is an

> anagram?



I hadn't realised until the man himself pointed it out recently.


But you're still the man that didn't "get" Liverpool mad Annasfield's name, and that is still funny ;-)

And SJ was it you who was amazed the late great Ted Max lived on a certain road?


StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "But you're still the man that didn't "get"

> Liverpool mad Annasfield's name, and that is still

> funny"

>

> yup

Back on subject of Alan. I've only met him a couple of times but he's a solid guy and I have a lot of time for him. Interesting life he's had and as ever, if real life takes a turn, the machinations of the forum can aggravate. As people have already said, I'm sure he will be back

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It always amazes me when people get into personal

> disputes on the forum. Surely we all know by now

> that after a couple of posts the best thing to do

> is move on.


Except too many feel that they have to have the last word, not wanting to be seen by the wider audience as 'losing face'...over to you Mick :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...