Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In truth there is a time and a place for humour and I for 1 don't agree with hijacking threads or trolling, but some of the things people write about lean toward the ridiculous and some people including myself at times would cut to the chase and make a point of directly expressing my opinion of how ludicrous the subject matter is. Having said that though everybody has the right to be heard and lately there have been some rather pathetic attempts to cause dischord.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a tendency, on the part of some, to take

> every opportunity to make a joke, diverting the

> thread into a series of "humorous" exchanges

> between mates and, effectively, hijacking the

> subject.

>

> Once in a while it is genuinely amusing - when it

> happens so often and by the same posters it

> becomes a little tedious. It may be part of the

> problem that Brum's identified above.

>

> EG: Tessa Jowell's post today about how to report

> bad behaviour on buses, the recent post about Alan

> Sugar and his possible mayoral candicacy.


MM I cannot for the life of me see why a jumped-up 'knight' who maybe, possibly, thinking about putting himself forward for public office, shouldn't be a subject that one might gently or roughly ridicule.

I reckon he'll never do it because it would involve actually not having complete control over his workforce and being unable to bully people on telly.

Also he'd be revealed as a pug-ugly schmuck.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No way! My anonymity is what keeps me alive.

> There's only one person on this forum who know my

> real name.


Oh Mr Wolf darling, you make a girl feel so very, very (and I mean this so very sincerely) special (SWOON)...

Not all the time but you don't know all the facts. Concerning the Madonna comparison, I'm disappointed in you Sean. You should have chose the time when she and Guy Ritchie was quite openly snapped leaving a sex shop whilst she held a transparent carrier back containing a strap-on. 'What it feels like for a girl', sorry but I couldn't help that.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your yearning for DM is disturbing Michael.



LOL! Fair come back.

Regarding Moos' post, I see what you're saying, but I'd stop posting altogether on a forum where people were banned for being offensive. Offensive is a world apart from hate stirring troll.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Language Moos! You're right though as I do get

> carried away sometimes but I do resent being

> constantly picked on.

>

> Those in cardboard box's Mike, cardboard

> box's.........


BBW, you seem like a nice wolf to me but some people simply are more sensitive to insult than others, and there's no reason why their feelings should be less important than yours. Sorry. Buy you a beer?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...