Jump to content

Recommended Posts

keekybreeks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i lose track of what i am supposed to find

> acceptable these days in the vibrant ED


> I can always lie & say I am bang into 80s hip hop & Northern Soul as a default if I have to keep face i spose



You can like whatever you want. But Mumford & Sons will always be godawful mobile-phone-advert shite.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you all sure none of you liked Mumford & Sons

> even a little bit when they started out? I find

> that surprising.




I like one of their songs. Don't know what it's called, but it's good. But I drove up to boro with a mate a while back and he played the first two albums the whole way. It made a very long trip absolutely awful.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> miga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Are you all sure none of you liked Mumford &

> Sons

> > even a little bit when they started out? I find

> > that surprising.

>

>


you should have stuck on Chris Rea- his road to hell thang is about the A19


or maybe that isnt EDF dadster enough ?

>

> I like one of their songs. Don't know what it's

> called, but it's good. But I drove up to boro with

> a mate a while back and he played the first two

> albums the whole way. It made a very long trip

> absolutely awful.

I liked one Arcade Fire song (Ready To Start) and didn't mind one Mumford song (the one that goes "and I will change my ways"). I mean a good song is a good song - whether it's played by a Canadian in fancy dress, or a posh Englishman with a banjo. But neither band are really my bag.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't need you to tell me to 'fight against' racism.  I know what it looks it like, thank you.  And China would be our enemy whether we were in Europe or not (and has been for a long time), so that's immaterial.  I remember covering an EDL march 12 years ago, when there was a Cons-Lib Dem coalition, so the idea that this is a new problem is rubbish. BUT Reform is doing an excellent job of galvanising a minority in reaction to smug liberals like you, who blame the electorate's collective ignorance for all the country's demons.  What right have you for a moral mandate? 
    • Both Labour and Conservatives can remove the threat of a Reform government by making making two major policy promises. And these are .......... (1) categorically state that they will take Britain out of the ECHR and (2) Undertake to remove any new small boat arrivals to Rwanda or wherever else. Reform is basically a single issue party and adopting (1) & (2) would send Reform into obscurity. The country has had enough of our judiciary making a gold-plated interpretation of the ECHR statutes.  
    • You fight against by not pretending. By calling it what it is. Instead of slyly pretending they are not racist “actually”  recognise what the country is facing and say “no” why do you even need to ask the question?
    • How does one 'fight against...'?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...