Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am so disappointed to hear this.


I have a choice between train or bus in the mornings and most mornings try to get up early enough so I can get the 12 all the way in to Piccadilly Circus. Despite the longer travel time its a much better start to the day and I read all the way in. Lovely, especially on a sunny morning.


The new routemasters are so cramped and dark upstairs compared with modern buses. I'm not sure I want to spend an hour on one each morning.


When they built the original routemasters they made the windows that size because of the manufacturing limitations of the day. We can now make buses with much better bigger windows so why go backwards? We should be making new history and not trying to hang on to the past. We need to be making new designs that will become iconic to London, not aping old ones.

I know what you mean antantant. I do a short jaunt on the 38 from Victoria on mornings I get the train its much quicker boarding the new Routemaster all right.


If they had built a bus with 3 doors and not made the upstairs cramped and stuffy we'd both be happy! :-)

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didn't see any conductors on the two buses I saw

> today.


They don't have conductors and so the back doors are kept shut most of the time. No 'hop on, hop off', just badly ventilated, very expensive buses.

I like the new routemasters but I suspect the lack of conductors will end up as a repeat of the bendy bus days where most people avoided paying their fares because they used the two back doors.


Buses a great idea, lack of conductor not so.

  • 2 weeks later...
I went on the Boris bus at the request of my little one last week. Awful ! I'm a midget and I struggled with the lack of leg room, the lack of air and the steep stairs. What a total waste of money like the bendy buses . If it ain't broke ....

I have only been on the new Routemaster a couple of time so far, despite using the 12 fairly regularly.

None of those times could have been warm day as I didn't notice..... Is this true, does the air conditioning not work very well on them? or could it be an individual fault on a particular bus?

I notice there are no opening windows, so if they really do get hot it is a design disaster!

Perhaps it is down to the driver to control?

I remember years ago rather angrily pointing out to the train driver as we arrived at LB that it was June and no need to have the heating pumping out in the carriages!


One thing I did notice was the poor visibility on the top deck. One of the few joys of getting the bus is the view.

Without getting the tape measure out, the top deck windows must be 30% smaller...probably half the size at the front!

I was on one for the first time (12) and, despite being overly tall with lanky legs, I found it a good fit. I sat right at the back and didn't feel too hot, too cramped, too anything. I do wish, though, that conductors were on them at peak times, at least.
The whole 'Boris' bus thing is a total folly. They have cost a fortune and their 'USP' - the 'hop on, hop off' back door is closed nearly all of the time. In almost every other respect they perform less favorably to the standard double decker. Boris just can't help raiding the transport budget to fund his little vanity projects (e.g. the Emirates 'Dangleway' the Garden Bridge etc.). I really wish he would be held to account.

Can anyone explain the Emeriates Dangle Way thing. We went on it a few weeks ago when the wind was really whipping it up, somewhat overlooked just how WINDY it was. I mean it's great fun, but seems utterly pointless.

That said, it's a great view of that part of London (once you've conquered the fear bit)


I like the no 12 new bus, but only for a breif journey tho

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I much prefer Romeo Jones to >spit< Gail's, but I'm struggling to blame this on the LTN when nothing outside Romeo Jones has changed, the LTN came in 5 (!!!) years ago, and Gail's has queues out the door most days. It also is directly opposite Rocca (which serves coffee and has seating), next door to Porters (which serves coffee and has seating), a few doors along from Real Greek (which serves coffee and has seating), and diagonally across from Gail's (which serves coffee and sells baked goods and has seating). I'll be sorry to see Romeo Jones go (not least because I have a stack of stamped loyalty cards). I don't want to criticise small business owners because it's a tough old racket, but DVillage never really seemed to find its niche either as a proper deli (like La Gastronomia or The Sicilian in West Dulwich) or as a coffee shop (which is difficult when you have Megan's and Redemption right next to you, and Au Ciel around the corner).
    • Hopefully we will see something like Melbourne Grove, where all the shops that initially closed after the road closures were then replaced with new ones. I think all the units on that street are now finally open for business.
    • Here's a working link: https://www.propertywire.com/news/london/circa-london-partners-with-developer-to-sell-9-6m-dulwich-townhouses-to-far-east-buyers/ I think they look quite nice from the outside which is what matters to me as a member of the public. The indoor floorplan is not to my taste with lots of awkward small floors, but I don't care about the inside as I don't plan on living in them. 
    • The Romeo Jones owner blames rising costs, but also the impact of the LTNs, which have significantly reduced footfall in the Village. It was a lovely, friendly place – a shame that it's only chains like Gail's that can afford to take rising costs on the chin.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...