Jump to content

Recommended Posts

T???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > bodsier Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Simple and clear cut analysis.....

> > >

> > >

> >

> http://benjaminstudebaker.com/2015/05/02/britain-f

>

> > or-the-love-of-god-please-stop-david-cameron/

> >

> > Or, to summarise: the author took 77 graphs to

> > show he thinks Cameron is bad, but then

> concludes

> > that Miliband will only a teenie-tiny itsy-bit

> > better. Maybe.

>

>

> Was there No graph on either employment levels or

> unemployment. UK GDP growth compared to Other

> European countries cut off handily at 2012....wot

> no 2013 and 2014 figures, why on earth could that

> be? Surely not because they don't fit in with his

> anti-coalition narrative




Yes for the love of God stop David Cameron from privatising everything and leaving the poor destitute...?????? or however many ? your tag has... Lower figures of unemployment are partly because of people going self employed, and not necessarily earning more than the unemployed due to economic instability and not many people spending....

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I agree no one cares about electoral reform

> other

> > than the lib dems and other minor parties. If

> it

> > ain't broke why fix it?

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> LOL - cos it's broken.


You may think so, the lib dems may think so, but the vast majority of the electorate couldn't give a damn either way.


Louisa.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bodsier Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Yes for the love of God stop David Cameron from

> privatising everything and leaving the poor

> destitute...

>

> Instead, vote Miliband and get pretty much exactly

> the same thing?


Well... Loosely speaking, a Vindaloo in one Indian restaurant is much the same as any other Indian restaurant.


Sometimes it's nice to have a change.


Foxy

hello and welcome to the election thread


selective cut and paste more than welcome to make a point but be warned, regular posters in the policts threads have been know to amend wikipedia to back up their point and subsequently post a link, so get your edits in early


we welcome sock puppets as you can see


GCH not tested


share of freehold

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BrandNewGuy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I agree no one cares about electoral reform

> > other

> > > than the lib dems and other minor parties. If

> > it

> > > ain't broke why fix it?

> > >

> > > Louisa.

> >

> > LOL - cos it's broken.

>

> You may think so, the lib dems may think so, but

> the vast majority of the electorate couldn't give

> a damn either way.

>

> Louisa.


So the system works because the vast majority don't give a damn? Interesting view of democracy.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > BrandNewGuy Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Louisa Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > I agree no one cares about electoral reform

> > > other

> > > > than the lib dems and other minor parties.

> If

> > > it

> > > > ain't broke why fix it?

> > > >

> > > > Louisa.

> > >

> > > LOL - cos it's broken.

> >

> > You may think so, the lib dems may think so,

> but

> > the vast majority of the electorate couldn't

> give

> > a damn either way.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> So the system works because the vast majority

> don't give a damn? Interesting view of democracy.


The system works because we wouldn't be here today in a stable democracy which has produced stable majority government for most of the last century. The fact there isn't appetite amongst the populus for electoral reform speaks volumes too. I can understand why it would upset supporters of a minor party, but I think that's a good price to pay for stable Government (most of the time).


Louisa.

I agree Louisa. Electoral reform is not the subject of the title.

I have a daughter at university ( 2012) intake and the first to have paid the increased fees.

According to her there are plenty of students voting, good for them. They are exercising their democratic right to vote for the first time in their lives.

Use your vote, don't complain about the consequences if you don't .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...