Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What sort of a witless existence must a person

> lead to give enough of an actual toss about soap

> opera plotlines and manufactured talent shows - to

> commit fingers to keyboard with any degree of

> seriousness?



Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A not very bright homophobe?



Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love you *Bob*. x



As you were...

A quick Google search gives the following definition... "The avoidance of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against". Which could probably be simplified to "not being a bully". Sounds OK.

I think I can help here Tarot.


I've attached a picture of something called a 'remote control'. This is used to 'remotely control' your 'television' without the minimum of effort. If you look carefully there are numbered buttons - pressing these allows you to change the 'channels' to see something different.


There's also a row of coloured buttons. Simply press blue for 'less gay', yellow for 'less foreigners' etc etc


If all else fails, there's the 'off' button.


file.php?20,file=176233

If this lady* were a man, she'd be gay for *Bob*.


And if this lady were a gay car, she'd run Tarot down. Who knew there were still these thoughts? I'm naive, I guess I didn't.




*NB - this lady is using 'lady' only in reference to a famous feminist story, just in case Otta was wondering.

lol Heterophobes!


Do you feel presecuted now Tarot because no-one shares your same bigotted viewpoint. You haven't actually responded to a single point made, all of them far more sensible than your view that children can be adversely affected by seeing gay characters in a soap drama. Have ANYTHING to say about that? Head, cloud, cuckoo land comes to mind.


Meanwhile, Dot I believe is an android. That's why she looks not a single day older from her appearance in the first episode.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • With the right type of feeder arrangement the access by parakeets, squirrels and rats can be eliminated completely. Likewise, the spread of disease can be minimised. The best method is to hang individual feeders inside a wire  cage that has a 2"x2" mesh on all sides that is mounted above ground. Being above ground it stops slugs and rats getting in. And with mesh on the bottom,the risk of transmitting disease from any droppings is eliminated. Small birds feel safe from predators in three These cages are available online for about £33
    • It is worthwhile noting that the original technical meaning was 'a reduction of 10%', which does not, to my mind, chime at all with 'drastically reduce'. I know that's how it is, I think lazily, often used nowadays but it does allow 'decimate' to be used so loosely that it loses meaning. And it can be confusing to those who know it's original meaning. I think that the fact that decimate and devastate are close homonyms does not help things here. 
    • Hi, I'm after a length of plastic or aluminium pipe, 40-50mm diameter and at least 600mm long. An unwanted offcut of plumbing soil pipe would be ideal. Many thanks!
    • But as language changes, it is no longer the "true" definition!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...