Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think the time has come for us to have a grown up adult discussion about the true meaning of this word. As I am banned from the general issues section and cannot respond publicly to some of the pretty nasty sneering aimed at me on a certain other thread, I would like to raise it here.


In defence of my PM to this 'robbin' person, I was trying to make the point that sneering DOES work both ways. You can't accuse me of being obnoxious on the one hand (based on previous posts) when the very comment I am refering to made by you is indeed obnoxious. Lots of pot kettle black stuff going on here today.


A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but the lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering is obvious for all to see most of the time (I do hope you are taking note admin). I'm sick to the back teeth of people misunderstanding me even after I've explained myself, then winding me up knowing full well I can't respond on the thread in question. It's sneaky underhand tactical stuff which exposes your apparent 'anti troll' rants for what they really are, TROLLING.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but

> the

> > lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering

> is

> > obvious for all to see

>

>

>

> I have to agree that there are some unbelievably

> humourless people on this forum.


Surely not Otta.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841223
Share on other sites

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but

> the

> > lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering

> is

> > obvious for all to see

>

>

>

> I have to agree that there are some unbelievably

> humourless people on this forum.


I think it is just that Louisa's humour and also my own humour does not come across in written form.

It is true what Louisa said 'A lot of her humour is lost in translation'

That would seem to apply to myself..


Face to face its is easier to get what people are getting at when you have eye contact.

The little glint in the eye, the wink, the nod.. :)


DulwichFox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841225
Share on other sites

More subtle sneering. Get off your high horse. If you didn't want to respond and genuinely believed in the 'anti-troll' references you so spouted on the other thread, surely you'd not respond at all? Instead we have the 'not me honest gov' approach, where you reply by saying you won't be replying. If that isn't trolling I don't know what is.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841233
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> More subtle sneering. Get off your high horse. If

> you didn't want to respond and genuinely believed

> in the 'anti-troll' references you so spouted on

> the other thread, surely you'd not respond at

> all? Instead we have the 'not me honest gov'

> approach, where you reply by saying you won't be

> replying. If that isn't trolling I don't know what

> is.

>

> Louisa.


I agree, why should Louisa have to put up with everyone's 'take' on her but she doesn't have a voice in that area. Wrong on every level...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841241
Share on other sites

The old Louisa is dead, I've promised myself and a few others to not steer back into previous conversational favourites of mine, and as yet have not done so. Then someone tries to push my buttons to get me to talk about a topic I have tried to leave behind me. So rather than rise to that, I am back with a completely different take on local issues. I refuse to be drawn on Iceland, class or parents with a buggy. From now on, I want to be taken seriously, any drinks events on the horizon? I refuse to be trolled back into previous topics.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841281
Share on other sites

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The old Louisa is dead, I've promised myself and a

> few others to not steer back into previous

> conversational favourites of mine, and as yet have

> not done so. Then someone tries to push my buttons

> to get me to talk about a topic I have tried to

> leave behind me. So rather than rise to that, I am

> back with a completely different take on local

> issues. I refuse to be drawn on Iceland, class or

> parents with a buggy. From now on, I want to be

> taken seriously, any drinks events on the horizon?

> I refuse to be trolled back into previous topics.

>

>

> Louisa.


You could come along to Curry Club .. We have drinks before -- during -- and after our meal..


Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841298
Share on other sites

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I for one don't mind having you around Louisa -

> even if those old topics you refer to were getting

> done to death by you and boring many. But if

> you're going to flounce then for god's sake do it

> properly....

>

> Coming back after just 2 days doesn't really

> count!


MrBen as I explained to Jeremy, I really tried but couldn't do it. I tried to delete my profile and realised it wasn't possible, then I thought oh bugger it the forum is getting more and more dull as many faces disappear, may as well go down with the sinking ship.


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841306
Share on other sites

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I for one don't mind having you around Louisa -

> even if those old topics you refer to were getting

> done to death by you and boring many. But if

> you're going to flounce then for god's sake do it

> properly....

>

> Coming back after just 2 days doesn't really

> count!



So what would've been better? If she'd done a proper 'flounce' and not returned at all?

You say you don't mind having her around so why question a change of decision?


You should be celebrating instead. One less missing person.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841313
Share on other sites

Lou - when you do a massive rotten fart, sometimes it takes a while for the aroma to dissipate.


Try to think in terms of you having done one long, continuous, stinking guff - continually - for several years. You can't wave your hand a bit and away it goes. Can't be done. Its going to take some window opening and duvet wafting; possibly even a scented candle.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/57259-sneering/#findComment-841319
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...