Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You could come along to Curry Club .. We have

> drinks before -- during -- and after our meal..

>

> Foxy



Careful Louisa, it starts off with a drink...a curry...then another drink...then the little glint in the eye...the wink...the nod...then before you know it, he's offering to take you up the Khyber Pass*


*Other Indian restaurants are available

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but

> the

> > lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering

> is

> > obvious for all to see

>

>

>

> I have to agree that there are some unbelievably

> humourless people on this forum.



That would be true if Louisawas funny

Now Aquarius Moon, you know more than anyone that the correct flounce procedure is:


1. Become embroiled emotionally in what is a tin pot local forum full of freaks. You crack.

2. Post a public proclamation as to your reasons...usually "I'm out...you lot are losers" etc etc

3. Ask admin to delete your account (you failed Lou)

3. Lurk in sulk mode for 1-3 months.

4. Return as someone else

5. Pretend you are not the person you were previously


The exceptions are the playful character swaps ala Seabag.

*Bob*, I've opened the window now does that help?


Red devil I'm happy being taken up the Khyber pass as long as they do the spicy chutney dip with their poppadoms.


The trouble is rah, I can deal with someone not liking me or finding me funny, that's fine. I'm more than happy to take it on the chin and agree to disagree. What I can't stand is a witch hunt, particularly when it's coming from a rather dull set of humourless posters who all gang together wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how lovely the world is, and how one individual (me) is horrible- when in plain sight they are being obnoxious, trolling and doing the very things they accuse me of doing. Works both ways. It's boring to be honest, without colourful opinions this forum would be a very dull place. I've stated my position, I will not be referring back to previous topics, which we all agree have been done to death. But, I will not change my character and become some lifeless yes person. It's easy to pick out specific posts or threads to suit the consensus that Louisa is a horrible person, or unfunny or anything else derogatory. I could do the same for specific members of the forum too if I wanted, but I don't wish to take part in a witch hunt of anyone. I do not dislike anyone enough to do that.


Louisa.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now Aquarius Moon, you know more than anyone that

> the correct flounce procedure is:

>

> 1. Become embroiled emotionally in what is a tin

> pot local forum full of freaks. You crack.

> 2. Post a public proclamation as to your

> reasons...usually "I'm out...you lot are losers"

> etc etc

> 3. Ask admin to delete your account (you failed

> Lou)

> 3. Lurk in sulk mode for 1-3 months.

> 4. Return as someone else

> 5. Pretend you are not the person you were

> previously

>

> The exceptions are the playful character swaps ala

> Seabag.


6. fuck to it. (not aimed at mr ben but my previous post btw)


edit: PS welcome back Louisa, always loved your work.

Louisa- the thing is, the repetition of the same 'blow ins' thing over and over ad nauseum, doesn't (in my opinion) make the forum more interesting. It's not particularly funny or challenging. I'm all for people debating, arguing, outraging even, but not just endlessly repeating the same schtick. BTW- I have never (as I think I've said) found your posts offensive and I do quite find the references to sunbathing and being on the sauce all quite funny.

Admin has not divulged rah but I fear it may be permanent because a fair few people in ED general issues have supported my ban with follow up messages to admin what a nasty individual I am. As I say, witch hunt. I honestly believe a few people on Oakhurst Grove have seen me in the garden with my bottle and are monitoring my every movement post ban. I feel trapped within these four walls, awaiting my sentence. Mr Louisa refuses to be drawn on any of this but I do suspect he is somehow involved in this conspiracy.


Louisa.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > A lot of my humour is lost in translation,

> but

> > the

> > > lack of humour in some posters whilst

> sneering

> > is

> > > obvious for all to see

> >

> >

> >

> > I have to agree that there are some

> unbelievably

> > humourless people on this forum.

>

>

> That would be true if Louisawas funny



I wasn't talking specifically in terms of Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The trouble is rah, I can deal with someone not

> liking me or finding me funny, that's fine. I'm

> more than happy to take it on the chin and agree

> to disagree. What I can't stand is a witch hunt,

> particularly when it's coming from a rather dull

> set of humourless posters who all gang together

> wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how

> lovely the world is, and how one individual (me)

> is horrible- when in plain sight they are being

> obnoxious, trolling and doing the very things they

> accuse me of doing. Works both ways. It's boring

> to be honest, without colourful opinions this

> forum would be a very dull place. I've stated my

> position, I will not be referring back to previous

> topics, which we all agree have been done to

> death. But, I will not change my character and

> become some lifeless yes person. It's easy to pick

> out specific posts or threads to suit the

> consensus that Louisa is a horrible person, or

> unfunny or anything else derogatory. I could do

> the same for specific members of the forum too if

> I wanted, but I don't wish to take part in a witch

> hunt of anyone. I do not dislike anyone enough to

> do that.




Good post.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> set of humourless posters who all gang together

> wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how

> lovely the world is




Agree that there is a lot of this. Say anything not entirely positive about something they like (even if it's something you also like but just have a minor gripe with), and you're accused of being constantly negative.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I honestly believe a few people

> on Oakhurst Grove have seen me in the garden with

> my bottle and are monitoring my every movement

> post ban. I feel trapped within these four walls,

> awaiting my sentence. Mr Louisa refuses to be

> drawn on any of this but I do suspect he is

> somehow involved in this conspiracy.

>

> Louisa.


... To be fair, this did make me laugh.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > set of humourless posters who all gang together

> > wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying

> how

> > lovely the world is

>

>

>

> Agree that there is a lot of this. Say anything

> not entirely positive about something they like

> (even if it's something you also like but just

> have a minor gripe with), and you're accused of

> being constantly negative.


What Otta said

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Which is why I was careful to specify "the true definition"! A bit like "dilemma", generally used for any tricky decisions but should really be where there are only two options, both with equally bad outcomes...
    • I raise your pedantry. Language evolves and Merriam Webster gives the meaning as "drastically reduced especially in number." The word originally derived from the Roman practice of killing every tenth soldier in a mutinous army but I'm sure nobody uses the word in that context now.
    • Thanks all for the replies.  When the roofer come to look at the roof more recently,  there were holes in the felt in the same place that the original leak had been,  as well as where the new leak is.  There doesn't seem to be a reason why a hole the the felt was the cause of one leak and not the other.  It would have been good to have got everything sorted at the same time,  rather than having to put scaffolding up again.  But my main issue is around the vagueness of a 10 year guarantee.  After work was done the first time,  the roofer gave us a summary of the work and just wrote '10 Yr guarantee' after, without specifying what exactly that means.   If a roofer comes and doesn't diagnose the problem quite right (which i imagine is common with roofs, given it's not always clear what's causing a leak), the guarantee doesn't seem to apply. But anyway,  we'll be getting a different roofer, because we think he should have checked the felt under the tiles the first time round.  
    • We used to feed the birds, but once the parakeets discovered this they just took over, scaring away all the other species and eating everything in sight. I tried scaring them away with a Nerf gun, but they just didn't care. I know it will open a can of worms (no pun intended) but I really think  the parakeet population needs to be reduced; yes they are pretty, but they are just like a plague of locusts when it comes to food supplies.  PS apologies for pedantry @malumbu but the true definition of "decimate" is to reduce by a tenth... 🫤
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...