Jump to content

Sneering

Louisa

By Louisa
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You could come along to Curry Club .. We have

> drinks before -- during -- and after our meal..

>

> Foxy



Careful Louisa, it starts off with a drink...a curry...then another drink...then the little glint in the eye...the wink...the nod...then before you know it, he's offering to take you up the Khyber Pass*


*Other Indian restaurants are available

Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but

> the

> > lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering

> is

> > obvious for all to see

>

>

>

> I have to agree that there are some unbelievably

> humourless people on this forum.



That would be true if Louisawas funny

MrBen

MrBen

Posted
Posted

Now Aquarius Moon, you know more than anyone that the correct flounce procedure is:


1. Become embroiled emotionally in what is a tin pot local forum full of freaks. You crack.

2. Post a public proclamation as to your reasons...usually "I'm out...you lot are losers" etc etc

3. Ask admin to delete your account (you failed Lou)

3. Lurk in sulk mode for 1-3 months.

4. Return as someone else

5. Pretend you are not the person you were previously


The exceptions are the playful character swaps ala Seabag.

Louisa

Louisa

Posted
  • Author
Posted

*Bob*, I've opened the window now does that help?


Red devil I'm happy being taken up the Khyber pass as long as they do the spicy chutney dip with their poppadoms.


The trouble is rah, I can deal with someone not liking me or finding me funny, that's fine. I'm more than happy to take it on the chin and agree to disagree. What I can't stand is a witch hunt, particularly when it's coming from a rather dull set of humourless posters who all gang together wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how lovely the world is, and how one individual (me) is horrible- when in plain sight they are being obnoxious, trolling and doing the very things they accuse me of doing. Works both ways. It's boring to be honest, without colourful opinions this forum would be a very dull place. I've stated my position, I will not be referring back to previous topics, which we all agree have been done to death. But, I will not change my character and become some lifeless yes person. It's easy to pick out specific posts or threads to suit the consensus that Louisa is a horrible person, or unfunny or anything else derogatory. I could do the same for specific members of the forum too if I wanted, but I don't wish to take part in a witch hunt of anyone. I do not dislike anyone enough to do that.


Louisa.

numbers

numbers

Posted
Posted

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now Aquarius Moon, you know more than anyone that

> the correct flounce procedure is:

>

> 1. Become embroiled emotionally in what is a tin

> pot local forum full of freaks. You crack.

> 2. Post a public proclamation as to your

> reasons...usually "I'm out...you lot are losers"

> etc etc

> 3. Ask admin to delete your account (you failed

> Lou)

> 3. Lurk in sulk mode for 1-3 months.

> 4. Return as someone else

> 5. Pretend you are not the person you were

> previously

>

> The exceptions are the playful character swaps ala

> Seabag.


6. fuck to it. (not aimed at mr ben but my previous post btw)


edit: PS welcome back Louisa, always loved your work.

Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted
Louisa- the thing is, the repetition of the same 'blow ins' thing over and over ad nauseum, doesn't (in my opinion) make the forum more interesting. It's not particularly funny or challenging. I'm all for people debating, arguing, outraging even, but not just endlessly repeating the same schtick. BTW- I have never (as I think I've said) found your posts offensive and I do quite find the references to sunbathing and being on the sauce all quite funny.
Louisa

Louisa

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Admin has not divulged rah but I fear it may be permanent because a fair few people in ED general issues have supported my ban with follow up messages to admin what a nasty individual I am. As I say, witch hunt. I honestly believe a few people on Oakhurst Grove have seen me in the garden with my bottle and are monitoring my every movement post ban. I feel trapped within these four walls, awaiting my sentence. Mr Louisa refuses to be drawn on any of this but I do suspect he is somehow involved in this conspiracy.


Louisa.

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > A lot of my humour is lost in translation,

> but

> > the

> > > lack of humour in some posters whilst

> sneering

> > is

> > > obvious for all to see

> >

> >

> >

> > I have to agree that there are some

> unbelievably

> > humourless people on this forum.

>

>

> That would be true if Louisawas funny



I wasn't talking specifically in terms of Louisa.

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The trouble is rah, I can deal with someone not

> liking me or finding me funny, that's fine. I'm

> more than happy to take it on the chin and agree

> to disagree. What I can't stand is a witch hunt,

> particularly when it's coming from a rather dull

> set of humourless posters who all gang together

> wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how

> lovely the world is, and how one individual (me)

> is horrible- when in plain sight they are being

> obnoxious, trolling and doing the very things they

> accuse me of doing. Works both ways. It's boring

> to be honest, without colourful opinions this

> forum would be a very dull place. I've stated my

> position, I will not be referring back to previous

> topics, which we all agree have been done to

> death. But, I will not change my character and

> become some lifeless yes person. It's easy to pick

> out specific posts or threads to suit the

> consensus that Louisa is a horrible person, or

> unfunny or anything else derogatory. I could do

> the same for specific members of the forum too if

> I wanted, but I don't wish to take part in a witch

> hunt of anyone. I do not dislike anyone enough to

> do that.




Good post.

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> set of humourless posters who all gang together

> wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how

> lovely the world is




Agree that there is a lot of this. Say anything not entirely positive about something they like (even if it's something you also like but just have a minor gripe with), and you're accused of being constantly negative.

Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I honestly believe a few people

> on Oakhurst Grove have seen me in the garden with

> my bottle and are monitoring my every movement

> post ban. I feel trapped within these four walls,

> awaiting my sentence. Mr Louisa refuses to be

> drawn on any of this but I do suspect he is

> somehow involved in this conspiracy.

>

> Louisa.


... To be fair, this did make me laugh.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > set of humourless posters who all gang together

> > wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying

> how

> > lovely the world is

>

>

>

> Agree that there is a lot of this. Say anything

> not entirely positive about something they like

> (even if it's something you also like but just

> have a minor gripe with), and you're accused of

> being constantly negative.


What Otta said

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • malumbu
      The economy, a sensible debate in advance of the budget

      By malumbu · Posted

      @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • malumbu
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By malumbu · Posted

      I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • Sephiroth
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • HeadNun
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...