Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> You could come along to Curry Club .. We have

> drinks before -- during -- and after our meal..

>

> Foxy



Careful Louisa, it starts off with a drink...a curry...then another drink...then the little glint in the eye...the wink...the nod...then before you know it, he's offering to take you up the Khyber Pass*


*Other Indian restaurants are available

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A lot of my humour is lost in translation, but

> the

> > lack of humour in some posters whilst sneering

> is

> > obvious for all to see

>

>

>

> I have to agree that there are some unbelievably

> humourless people on this forum.



That would be true if Louisawas funny

Now Aquarius Moon, you know more than anyone that the correct flounce procedure is:


1. Become embroiled emotionally in what is a tin pot local forum full of freaks. You crack.

2. Post a public proclamation as to your reasons...usually "I'm out...you lot are losers" etc etc

3. Ask admin to delete your account (you failed Lou)

3. Lurk in sulk mode for 1-3 months.

4. Return as someone else

5. Pretend you are not the person you were previously


The exceptions are the playful character swaps ala Seabag.

*Bob*, I've opened the window now does that help?


Red devil I'm happy being taken up the Khyber pass as long as they do the spicy chutney dip with their poppadoms.


The trouble is rah, I can deal with someone not liking me or finding me funny, that's fine. I'm more than happy to take it on the chin and agree to disagree. What I can't stand is a witch hunt, particularly when it's coming from a rather dull set of humourless posters who all gang together wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how lovely the world is, and how one individual (me) is horrible- when in plain sight they are being obnoxious, trolling and doing the very things they accuse me of doing. Works both ways. It's boring to be honest, without colourful opinions this forum would be a very dull place. I've stated my position, I will not be referring back to previous topics, which we all agree have been done to death. But, I will not change my character and become some lifeless yes person. It's easy to pick out specific posts or threads to suit the consensus that Louisa is a horrible person, or unfunny or anything else derogatory. I could do the same for specific members of the forum too if I wanted, but I don't wish to take part in a witch hunt of anyone. I do not dislike anyone enough to do that.


Louisa.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now Aquarius Moon, you know more than anyone that

> the correct flounce procedure is:

>

> 1. Become embroiled emotionally in what is a tin

> pot local forum full of freaks. You crack.

> 2. Post a public proclamation as to your

> reasons...usually "I'm out...you lot are losers"

> etc etc

> 3. Ask admin to delete your account (you failed

> Lou)

> 3. Lurk in sulk mode for 1-3 months.

> 4. Return as someone else

> 5. Pretend you are not the person you were

> previously

>

> The exceptions are the playful character swaps ala

> Seabag.


6. fuck to it. (not aimed at mr ben but my previous post btw)


edit: PS welcome back Louisa, always loved your work.

Louisa- the thing is, the repetition of the same 'blow ins' thing over and over ad nauseum, doesn't (in my opinion) make the forum more interesting. It's not particularly funny or challenging. I'm all for people debating, arguing, outraging even, but not just endlessly repeating the same schtick. BTW- I have never (as I think I've said) found your posts offensive and I do quite find the references to sunbathing and being on the sauce all quite funny.

Admin has not divulged rah but I fear it may be permanent because a fair few people in ED general issues have supported my ban with follow up messages to admin what a nasty individual I am. As I say, witch hunt. I honestly believe a few people on Oakhurst Grove have seen me in the garden with my bottle and are monitoring my every movement post ban. I feel trapped within these four walls, awaiting my sentence. Mr Louisa refuses to be drawn on any of this but I do suspect he is somehow involved in this conspiracy.


Louisa.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > A lot of my humour is lost in translation,

> but

> > the

> > > lack of humour in some posters whilst

> sneering

> > is

> > > obvious for all to see

> >

> >

> >

> > I have to agree that there are some

> unbelievably

> > humourless people on this forum.

>

>

> That would be true if Louisawas funny



I wasn't talking specifically in terms of Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The trouble is rah, I can deal with someone not

> liking me or finding me funny, that's fine. I'm

> more than happy to take it on the chin and agree

> to disagree. What I can't stand is a witch hunt,

> particularly when it's coming from a rather dull

> set of humourless posters who all gang together

> wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how

> lovely the world is, and how one individual (me)

> is horrible- when in plain sight they are being

> obnoxious, trolling and doing the very things they

> accuse me of doing. Works both ways. It's boring

> to be honest, without colourful opinions this

> forum would be a very dull place. I've stated my

> position, I will not be referring back to previous

> topics, which we all agree have been done to

> death. But, I will not change my character and

> become some lifeless yes person. It's easy to pick

> out specific posts or threads to suit the

> consensus that Louisa is a horrible person, or

> unfunny or anything else derogatory. I could do

> the same for specific members of the forum too if

> I wanted, but I don't wish to take part in a witch

> hunt of anyone. I do not dislike anyone enough to

> do that.




Good post.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> set of humourless posters who all gang together

> wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying how

> lovely the world is




Agree that there is a lot of this. Say anything not entirely positive about something they like (even if it's something you also like but just have a minor gripe with), and you're accused of being constantly negative.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I honestly believe a few people

> on Oakhurst Grove have seen me in the garden with

> my bottle and are monitoring my every movement

> post ban. I feel trapped within these four walls,

> awaiting my sentence. Mr Louisa refuses to be

> drawn on any of this but I do suspect he is

> somehow involved in this conspiracy.

>

> Louisa.


... To be fair, this did make me laugh.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > set of humourless posters who all gang together

> > wanting to agree for the sake of it by saying

> how

> > lovely the world is

>

>

>

> Agree that there is a lot of this. Say anything

> not entirely positive about something they like

> (even if it's something you also like but just

> have a minor gripe with), and you're accused of

> being constantly negative.


What Otta said

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...