Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As of this weekend, the children were playing there because someone has purposefully pulled down a section of fencing and lots of irresponsible parents were allowing their children to play in that area. My husband and I managed to avert one accident by stopping two little boys from trying to climb over a section of the spiky fence because they hadn't realised it was breached elsewhere. The new equipment may well not have been signed off as safe yet so i can't imagine how stupid those parents have to be to allow their little ones in there. Hopefully the fence is reinstated or the new section opened fully soonest.

Ironic that equipment designed to be played on by children needs 10 meetings of bureaucrats

to sanction the equipment as safe ...


...when children have been encouraged to play and climb on the new Pipe Sculptures which were

never primarily designed for that purpose.


Call me Old Fashioned..


Foxy

SLad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The new equipment may well not have been signed

> off as safe yet so i can't imagine how stupid

> those parents have to be to allow their little

> ones in there. Hopefully the fence is reinstated

> or the new section opened fully soonest.


That's possible, but I'd think it more likely that the fencing is there, as has been is in other parts of the park, to allow the grass to grow over the new landscape. All the new slopes will need something to hold them together, and grass does that quite well, but only if the root systems are allowed to develop properly.


If that doesn't happen, you'll get a lot of erosion and mud, and further costs to put it right again, which will mean less money for maintaining other things.

SLad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As of this weekend, the children were playing

> there because someone has purposefully pulled down

> a section of fencing and lots of irresponsible

> parents were allowing their children to play in

> that area. My husband and I managed to avert one

> accident by stopping two little boys from trying

> to climb over a section of the spiky fence because

> they hadn't realised it was breached elsewhere.

> The new equipment may well not have been signed

> off as safe yet so i can't imagine how stupid

> those parents have to be to allow their little

> ones in there. Hopefully the fence is reinstated

> or the new section opened fully soonest.



This has been going on for a few weeks, makes me so cross. Parents don't lift a finger to stop it, and so you look like a right mean bastard when you tell your kid that they can't join in.

Or... How about not putting up a pointless fence around a playground that kids can see but not touch?


The newly laid turf wasn't watered properly and didn't take in some areas, then the grass was left to over-grow rather than being promptly cut to encourage vigorous growth - exactly not the way to treat newly laid/seeded turf.


The opening was delayed by pointless incompetence/indifference.

Marcus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or... How about not putting up a pointless fence

> around a playground that kids can see but not

> touch?



When I was there (couple of weeks back)it certainly wasn't a pointless fence. It was a fence to stop kids playing on unfinished and potentially dangerous equipment.


I'm not one for wrapping kids in cotton wool, but I'd rather them be kept away from unfinished equipment.

Otta Wrote:


>

> This has been going on for a few weeks, makes me

> so cross. Parents don't lift a finger to stop it,

> and so you look like a right mean bastard when you

> tell your kid that they can't join in.



Tell me about it. I almost became the world's worst Aunt when I told my niece and nephew they weren't allowed to play on it. Luckily they were sated when they got to play on the brilliant new bits of play equipment which have been opened up at the end.


Who knows why the fence hasn't been removed yet (I assumed a final safety sign off which could well include the risks posed from allowing small children to clamber all over relatively steep banks without bedded in turf), but in addition to my safety concerns I have this weird and rather old-fashioned belief that certain things should be observed like spiky fences keeping little ones out of unfinished play areas.

Well - also what is the idea behind the new long low (climbing?) wall in the playground? Kids walk along the top but have to jump down (more or less safely given the height at the far end) and cannot pass each other easily if going in opposite directions on top.


It seems to me not such a great revamp, e.g. compare it with the playground in Brockwell park.


Z

As others said, I feel they should have taken inspiration from Brockwell Park playground that have utilised every inch of the space in exciting and different ways. Dulwich Park has so much to offer and yet the playground is lacklustre and uninspiring. They had so much space to really make something exciting and original and yet they have used so little of the available space and come up with something disappointing. Same with the playground in Peckham Rye. Do they not consult with parents or users of the playground as to what they want before re-designs?

As a Dulwich Park Friends committee member and long time volunteer, I'd highly recommend that you join the Friends (app form at dulwichparkfriends.org.uk) if you want to influence what happens in the park. We notify our members of plans and projects and invite comments. The consultation over the floodworks and related benefits for the park lasted 18 months and was widely publicised.


I will relay comments about the wall to the park manager - you can do this too, his contact details are on the Friends' website or Southwark's parks website. As to the playground, it's very subjective as to what is 'right'. I have had many comments direct about how enjoyable it is to have grassy, open, dog-free space for picnics and play. There is a cost factor too. The original playground was created after a big fundraising by the Friends. Volunteers are always welcome to help with keeping the park so pleasant to visit! Not least, we have a (more or less) monthly 'Dig the Park' where we work on planting and conservation work. Kids welcome, under supervision.


Trevor Moore

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There's probably a bigger discussion on why we celebrate Christmas (pagan/religious festival) and why everything has to shut down.  I've enjoyed Xmas days in Spain, Mexico and France where some businesses and restaurants are open, and in a number of non-Christrian countries.  In both sets of occasions it has been festive, but not over the top and the Spanish seem to have a more relaxed attitude in a country where the church is probably more important than the UK.  A Lounge conversation.  I'll no doubt be popping into the Forest Hill Road supermarket on Xmas day for things we have forgotten, with many others in a similar situation who grew up in the Christian faith (I've long since been an atheist).   
    • Would anyone have ends of balls of wool, any colour, to mend an old blanket? Any colour? With thanks Mila
    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...