Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure that would be expected of an MP on a ?65k salary, though, Louisiana. And conversely, the idea of 'buying outfits' at all would seem out-of-this-world to some people.


Isn't frugality just living within your means and looking for opportunities to save money?

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @ Moos

> So you'd expect a 'frugal' MP to be taking taxis

> everywhere? Perhaps you too are on Planet Noggin,

> along with Jacqui and chums.


Er, no - I just think that someone on a high salary like ?65k who doesn't buy outfits from charity shops or travels in taxis could still be considered frugal if she is living within her means. Actually, I don't at all see why clothing should be expensed at all, and I agree that somone who expenses his or her travel to the taxpayer should travel by public transport, especially in London.


I don't know what Planet Noggin is, but remind me when this debate became about me and my habits?

It?s not anything that Peter Oborne hasn?t said before through other media. Or anything that most thinking individuals haven?t worked out long ago.


It?s just a pity that this kind of commentary doesn?t make it onto the One Show so that the vast majority of people who still think that, ?Should I vote red or blue?? is actually a valid question, can?t hear it and realise that the real issue is that the entire system is fouled by corruption.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...