Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry to go OT, but can we please reveal the legend of how Gordon Sumner got his nickname for the utter elephant toss it almost certainly is.

He's rehearsing with some seasoned Geordie jazzers and he regularly wears a yelllow and black hooped tank top.

So the 'lads' chide him for this, reckoning he looks like a bee and therefore bestow the name 'Sting' on him.

In a pig's eye they did.

I reckon they would have named him 'Bumble' or 'Hives' or 'BollockChops' anything but something as cool as Sting.

It's never rung true for me.

Cats = psychopaths. We've been here before on the Forum, but I am of the school of Snorky here, sorry. I am sure if there were no cats the makers of TopCat could have found some other anthropomorphic impersonator of Sgt Bilko. TopBadger, perhaps.


(PS While I'm here, Jellyfish can piss off because although they look pretty in a certain light in the Horniman aquarium, they hurt. And you can't see them. And even the thought of their possible presence can take the edge off a bracing dip in the sea. The washed up ones are quite fun to jump into on the shoreline, though, if you are eight years old.

No bees = no honey = no Winnie The Pooh = no Tigger. I love Tigger so the bees can stay.


I may be paranoid, but the slugs in East Dulwich seem to be particularly huge - and they gather in such large numbers! I did declare war on them once and sprinkled them with salt - but I could swear I heard their little death cries and so I stopped, feeling very guilty. Now I just lay down poison.

Have to agree with Moos about Top Cat though and condemn Ted's ravings about Top Badger.

I don't know how much comedy could be generated by an animal who just frousts in his sett all the time, barely venturing out.

My knowledge of the badger's habits are based on a Fast Show sketch with Bob Fleming, but he seemed to know what he was talking about.

Couldn't see a badger cheeking up Dibble either.

come on, what about tigers? Tigers are cool. And snow leopards. They've got brilliant tails. You can't deny me a snow leopard.



They've got all the best agents haven't they, schmoozing it down at the beeb's Nat Hist Dept in Bristol. "Yes now, your wildebeest is an interesting enough creature for a ruminant, Sir David, but research shows that what your viewers want is all kill, all the time, and really my clients have been proven to deliver. ?100k a show less my 15%, please."

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No bees = no honey = no Winnie The Pooh = no

> Tigger. I love Tigger so the bees can stay.


Sorry Brum, TedMax killed off the tiger, so Tigger is dead meat. It's political correctness gone MAD round here, I tell you. Everyman wants the tiger but no, the PC-loving brigade doesn't approve so wham! no more tiger, never mind what the likes of you and me want oh no, not the ordinary person in the street it's just bye-bye tiger I remember when it was all jungle round here and now not a stripey cat in sight ..

If you were to ask me privately I might admit it's not the tiger's fault, but I'm afraid its domestic cousin has let the side down badly, so I've no option but to exclude them all. If, of course, Felix would put his paw up and come clean, then perhaps we could come to a more nuanced conclusion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The Dulwich Park Friends might know the answer: dulwichparkfriends.org.uk
    • Do any of them have automatic cars?
    • Lost beloved straw hat somewhere between Brockwell Park and Dulwich, was cycling and it was strapped to my backpack. Anyone have seen it/ found it?
    • Dear all, Bit of a random ask but in such a supportive and accepting community, I thought I'd see if anyone had time to help 🙂 I'm conducting research for my MSc Psychology dissertation, using a brief anonymous survey to explore attitudes towards intimate and non-monogamous relationships and how/if this interacts with factors such a family history and family making. The survey should take no longer than 10 mins and has been approved by the University of Roehampton. I'm hoping to circulate the survey widely enough that the data gathered is representational of the diversity in modern society across various aspects that constitutes personal identity. Some of the questions are of a personal nature and although could be considered a bit 'spicy', so just to reiterate, this is an anonymous survey. Link: https://roehamptonpsych.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_6zMVjmeYz0TsVCu Thanks you so much for your time and kindness in advance!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...