Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry to go OT, but can we please reveal the legend of how Gordon Sumner got his nickname for the utter elephant toss it almost certainly is.

He's rehearsing with some seasoned Geordie jazzers and he regularly wears a yelllow and black hooped tank top.

So the 'lads' chide him for this, reckoning he looks like a bee and therefore bestow the name 'Sting' on him.

In a pig's eye they did.

I reckon they would have named him 'Bumble' or 'Hives' or 'BollockChops' anything but something as cool as Sting.

It's never rung true for me.

Cats = psychopaths. We've been here before on the Forum, but I am of the school of Snorky here, sorry. I am sure if there were no cats the makers of TopCat could have found some other anthropomorphic impersonator of Sgt Bilko. TopBadger, perhaps.


(PS While I'm here, Jellyfish can piss off because although they look pretty in a certain light in the Horniman aquarium, they hurt. And you can't see them. And even the thought of their possible presence can take the edge off a bracing dip in the sea. The washed up ones are quite fun to jump into on the shoreline, though, if you are eight years old.

No bees = no honey = no Winnie The Pooh = no Tigger. I love Tigger so the bees can stay.


I may be paranoid, but the slugs in East Dulwich seem to be particularly huge - and they gather in such large numbers! I did declare war on them once and sprinkled them with salt - but I could swear I heard their little death cries and so I stopped, feeling very guilty. Now I just lay down poison.

Have to agree with Moos about Top Cat though and condemn Ted's ravings about Top Badger.

I don't know how much comedy could be generated by an animal who just frousts in his sett all the time, barely venturing out.

My knowledge of the badger's habits are based on a Fast Show sketch with Bob Fleming, but he seemed to know what he was talking about.

Couldn't see a badger cheeking up Dibble either.

come on, what about tigers? Tigers are cool. And snow leopards. They've got brilliant tails. You can't deny me a snow leopard.



They've got all the best agents haven't they, schmoozing it down at the beeb's Nat Hist Dept in Bristol. "Yes now, your wildebeest is an interesting enough creature for a ruminant, Sir David, but research shows that what your viewers want is all kill, all the time, and really my clients have been proven to deliver. ?100k a show less my 15%, please."

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No bees = no honey = no Winnie The Pooh = no

> Tigger. I love Tigger so the bees can stay.


Sorry Brum, TedMax killed off the tiger, so Tigger is dead meat. It's political correctness gone MAD round here, I tell you. Everyman wants the tiger but no, the PC-loving brigade doesn't approve so wham! no more tiger, never mind what the likes of you and me want oh no, not the ordinary person in the street it's just bye-bye tiger I remember when it was all jungle round here and now not a stripey cat in sight ..

If you were to ask me privately I might admit it's not the tiger's fault, but I'm afraid its domestic cousin has let the side down badly, so I've no option but to exclude them all. If, of course, Felix would put his paw up and come clean, then perhaps we could come to a more nuanced conclusion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This presumably hasn't been done by vandals. It's hardly a Sycamore Gap situation. So if it's been done by professionals, unless it was a mistake (unlikely) there must have been a good reason, as it would have cost money. It would perhaps have been a good idea to put a notice on the tree explaining why such drastic work was done, but usually (I think) it would be either because of disease (often not noticeable on the surface) or that the roots or branches  were endangering nearby structures. As already said, nobody on here is likely to know. The tree department in Southwark Council are helpful in my (admittedly limited) experience. Please post on here when you have found out, as I agree what's left of the tree looks pretty odd. Depending on why the work was done, possibly they intend to remove the rest as well?
    • I have a very stupid question. I want to get a SIM card to put in an old mobile as a back up,  in case despite my best efforts my mobile gets stolen and I have no way of contacting anybody quickly, eg banks. Can I just buy any old cheap pay as you go  SIM card and put say ten pounds on it and it will then be fine for years (with the phone kept charged!) even if I don't use it, or do I have to use the phone  every so often to keep the SIM card valid?
    • I hate to see trees cut down to such an unfinished state. Unless the tree is home to wildlife, an effort should be made to remove & replace. Otherwise, it's just so useless & unsightly.
    • Given the level of care in Dulwich Park, I would not expect this to be careless or unnecessary. It will grow back.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...