Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry to go OT, but can we please reveal the legend of how Gordon Sumner got his nickname for the utter elephant toss it almost certainly is.

He's rehearsing with some seasoned Geordie jazzers and he regularly wears a yelllow and black hooped tank top.

So the 'lads' chide him for this, reckoning he looks like a bee and therefore bestow the name 'Sting' on him.

In a pig's eye they did.

I reckon they would have named him 'Bumble' or 'Hives' or 'BollockChops' anything but something as cool as Sting.

It's never rung true for me.

Cats = psychopaths. We've been here before on the Forum, but I am of the school of Snorky here, sorry. I am sure if there were no cats the makers of TopCat could have found some other anthropomorphic impersonator of Sgt Bilko. TopBadger, perhaps.


(PS While I'm here, Jellyfish can piss off because although they look pretty in a certain light in the Horniman aquarium, they hurt. And you can't see them. And even the thought of their possible presence can take the edge off a bracing dip in the sea. The washed up ones are quite fun to jump into on the shoreline, though, if you are eight years old.

No bees = no honey = no Winnie The Pooh = no Tigger. I love Tigger so the bees can stay.


I may be paranoid, but the slugs in East Dulwich seem to be particularly huge - and they gather in such large numbers! I did declare war on them once and sprinkled them with salt - but I could swear I heard their little death cries and so I stopped, feeling very guilty. Now I just lay down poison.

Have to agree with Moos about Top Cat though and condemn Ted's ravings about Top Badger.

I don't know how much comedy could be generated by an animal who just frousts in his sett all the time, barely venturing out.

My knowledge of the badger's habits are based on a Fast Show sketch with Bob Fleming, but he seemed to know what he was talking about.

Couldn't see a badger cheeking up Dibble either.

come on, what about tigers? Tigers are cool. And snow leopards. They've got brilliant tails. You can't deny me a snow leopard.



They've got all the best agents haven't they, schmoozing it down at the beeb's Nat Hist Dept in Bristol. "Yes now, your wildebeest is an interesting enough creature for a ruminant, Sir David, but research shows that what your viewers want is all kill, all the time, and really my clients have been proven to deliver. ?100k a show less my 15%, please."

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No bees = no honey = no Winnie The Pooh = no

> Tigger. I love Tigger so the bees can stay.


Sorry Brum, TedMax killed off the tiger, so Tigger is dead meat. It's political correctness gone MAD round here, I tell you. Everyman wants the tiger but no, the PC-loving brigade doesn't approve so wham! no more tiger, never mind what the likes of you and me want oh no, not the ordinary person in the street it's just bye-bye tiger I remember when it was all jungle round here and now not a stripey cat in sight ..

If you were to ask me privately I might admit it's not the tiger's fault, but I'm afraid its domestic cousin has let the side down badly, so I've no option but to exclude them all. If, of course, Felix would put his paw up and come clean, then perhaps we could come to a more nuanced conclusion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Try oru space with Michelle. Think it runs on Wednesday evenings. She’s great. I also think the new casa core place does one but haven’t tried it. 
    • The OP is simply asking a question? and as a few people on this forum seem to know about every subject posted 🙄 maybe that was the reason for asking?😉 It's been such a dry summer so far, maybe "some trees" are becoming less stable due to lack of rainfall and needed some safety pollarding work?  (another question🙂)  
    • No offence, but why not start from the assumption that the trees team in Southwark Council know what they're doing because it's their job and aren't a bunch of ecogenocidal maniacs looking for excuses to cut back trees? I'm not an expert but if they're not coming back to cut down the rest, then it seems like pollarding. It always looks ugly at first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding
    • It looks like the branches overhung the entry way to the toilets. There's a lot of paranoia about at the moment about branch drop after a couple of sad accidents which have happened recently where beloved trees were propped up but still dropped branches then everyone jumps up and asks why nothing was done before. You might remember when the massive oak fell over in Peckham Rye by the skating park, thankfully no one was hurt.  I've noticed notices in almost every public space warning about branch drop and some trees have had barriers put underneath them etc. These things seem to come into vogue and then pass again.  I expect local authorities in their regular meetings have all been discussing their risk exposure and issues of corporate responsibility etc....and someone will have been assigned the task (and responsibility) of making everything all right. Perhaps this tree fell victim to that. I doubt there is malice and something they feel is safer/appropriate etc will take its place in due course.  I don't doubt cutting it back is an over reaction but at the same time we all bellow at them when things go wrong so there is a difficult path to navigate. It was a chestnut by the look of it, so not particularly rare I have plenty of saplings growing through my beds if they wish to replace like for like.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...