Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone heard of this fence they are erecting at the entrances to lordship lane east + west, cars that carry the EDF membership badge will travel toll free, everyone else who's name appears on a list of voters for parties other than the current local elected party will be charged a nominal sum, 1 ED pound. Also anyone not nice, or not contributing to the creation of a mini state will be called names run over by bugboo's. Insurrection will not be tolerated and mis-interpritation and gang mentality will be the rule of law. A watchtower will be built on goose green and it will be staffed by a faceless group of hardworking yet self appointed law makers. Tablets will be carved and handed out bi-monthly, er sorry that could be mis-interprited, so sorry to any swingers out there. Anyway the latest tablet clearly shows that now there is posh signage on the ED side of Peckham Rye Park that this is know in fact ED land. A renaming committee will be selected soon and a vote will be cast within a matter of months. We expect all workers of SE15 to re-treat to the new Post 2003 EDF borders....thank you


any idea about this toll then anyone ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5877-the-lords-of-the-lane/
Share on other sites

Yeah, can we be like the Hole In The Wall gang and rob trains?

And I don't mean stealing from them. I mean ROBBING the entire train, passengers and all.

We could hide it in some Nunhead thieves den and demand a huge ransom for it.

Then go somewhere with no extradition treaty and live like lord's bastards on the proceeds.

Ok so you?ve pulled the job off. But what exactly are you going to do with a trainload of irate commuters banged up in a builder?s yard somewhere in Nun?ead?


I doubt anyone will want them back. Probably be saving the city a fortune in credit crunch related redundancy payouts.


So how are you going to shift a king?s ransom in ipods and marketing degrees at short notice?

[quote name='Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

> Please may I be the moll?]



If Peckhamgatecrasher is going to be the 'moll'' date=' can I be '[b']Bonnie[/b]' with either ???? or Brendan as my 'Clyde'


here's a picture of ???? and I having a little cuddle...

(always the best thing to do before you get shot down in flames>:D<)

http://startelegram.typepad.com/crime_time/images/2008/03/31/bonnie_and_clyde_for_famous_crimes.jpg

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's clear to me Brendan that you've the brains to

> head up this outfit - fancy it? Think of the

> adulation...


Good point Brum, so Brendan's Butch Cassidy then.

I bagsy The Sundance Kid though.

Now who's going to be the school marm?

it's all suddenly become clear...


We are the Beano...

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/615wzazgGkL._SL500_AA240_.jpg

pick your character and get ready to play...



Bash Street Kids

Denis

Nasher (we all know who that is!!!)

Minnie the minx (absolutely not open to discussion... that's ME)


who else...

who's who????


http://www.paulmorris.co.uk/beano/strips/minnie2001.jpg


and last but not least... admin looking on and spoiling the fun (well... only sometimes xxcc)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/comicsbritannia/images/bash_st_teacher_spls.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...