Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To Admin - is it worth applying to the Council Community Fund for some funding ?http://www.southwark.gov.uk/YourCouncil/communitycouncils/Communityfund.html

Applications are open until 15th May. Given that (at least) one local councillor is aware of how incredibly popular and useful the EDF is, it's got to be worth applying for some funding to assist the running costs, surely.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5979-community-council-fund/
Share on other sites

I don't know how much it costs but I've used the Donate button at the bottom of the page a couple of times


What would worry me if the grant money became involved is a sense of "well we pay for this foum so it should be run the way we say". I say it's Admin's - his gaff, his rules

I think that "how much 'control' would the council want" was the first thing that crossed my mind, but the application would stipulate that the forum could be run as it has been i.e. independently since it started. That's what Admin and the team would want but most importantly it's what the users would want.


The application would be as transparent as possible and if there were any areas of uncertainty the forum users would be asked for their opinions.

If the application was approved then I'd be very surprised if it came with any strings attached or impact on Admin's editorial freedom. If you are concerned it might then contact the coordinator beforehand. Personally I'd rather see a portion of my council tax go to the EDF than paying for "fun days" or "trips to theme parks"....on second thoughts perhaps the application should be for a forumites "fact-finding" day-trip to a local brewery ?
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...