Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't pinpoint the exact the origins of this perniciously infectious means of agreeing with someone else's post and - as you know - I'm not one to wilfully put my head above the parapet, but I'd just like to suggest that it carries with it all the style of catching sight of your uncle dancing at a wedding (with a tie on his head) just at the moment that he raises his eyebrows as far up as they go, puts two thumbs up (at 45 degree angles) and says 'skill' with a gormless expression on his face.


Please make it stop. You know who you are.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6055-what-said/
Share on other sites

I think you'll find* that I identified 'The Keef Convention: saying "What X said" in agreement to a previous post' in my very brilliant but under-responded-to thread Conventions of the EDF in About This Forum.


So ner, it's official, and I'm going to keep doing it. And just look at these super-spiffing persons all upping their thumbs, what a marvellously positive and cheering activity it is! Many of them seem as though they could be uncles, and hurrah for them.


file.php?20,file=4103

file.php?20,file=4104

file.php?20,file=4105


*Isn't 'I think you'll find' an incredibly aggressive and unpleasant way to say a perfectly ordinary thing? It should never be used by persons of taste.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6055-what-said/#findComment-194289
Share on other sites

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think you'll find* that I identified 'The Keef

> Convention: saying "What X said" in agreement to a

> previous post' in my very brilliant but

> under-responded-to thread Conventions of the EDF

> in About This Forum.

>

> So ner, it's official, and I'm going to keep doing

> it. And just look at these super-spiffing persons

> all upping their thumbs, what a marvellously

> positive and cheering activity it is! Many of

> them seem as though they could be uncles, and

> hurrah for them.

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=4103

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=4104

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=4105

>

> *Isn't 'I think you'll find' an incredibly

> aggressive and unpleasant way to say a perfectly

> ordinary thing? It should never be used by

> persons of taste.



This speaks for the rest of us.


http://comps.fotosearch.com/comp/PDS/PDS080/crowd-looking-up_~AA025794.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6055-what-said/#findComment-194292
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The driver was male he was on a mobile No one was hurt l. Complete dick
    • Surely the question is whether James Mcash is effective in his various roles? I've seen nothing to suggest otherwise as a GG councillor or cabinet member. No idea about the teaching but he's made a career of it, so one would think he's perfectly fine on that front too. What I do object to is him being elected under one banner and hopping under another one, I suspect out of naked self interest. His headline rationale for the move is scarcely credible. He claims "the council was “planning for funding gaps larger than those faced in almost every year of Conservative and Liberal Democrat austerity, this time imposed by a Labour government...Unless something changes, Labour cuts will devastate the local services that as residents of this fantastic borough, we all rely on.” But what he's actually talking about here is the new Fair Funding Review, undertaken by notorious Tories Angela Rayner and Jim McMahon.   https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-fair-funding-review-20/the-fair-funding-review-20 The Fair Funding Review is explicitly about the redistribution of resources based on updated needs assessment, which, last time I looked was a key tenet of the left (including the Greens). Mcash also claims Southwark "cannot and does not stand up the the government" but that simply isn't the case as Southwark, Lambeth and London Councils have objected to the FFR because it fails to take into account Londoners' high housing costs. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/news/2025/southwark-and-lambeth-leaders-call-fair-funding  He seems high on bluster and low on actual detail. And the great problem Greens have to overcome, like everyone else, is that the country has no money.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...