Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We must have been watching a different speech.


All I saw was some smarmy little slimeball with nothing to say blustering his way through a typically unsubstantial and cheap point-scoring rebuff.

When the only person on your front bench who doesn't inspire a feeling a nausea is William Hague, all is not well.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194594
Share on other sites

Sean Mac said,


"I don't have to listen to any of the gloomy forecasts anymore. or at least, I don't have to take them seriously. The "expert forecasting" is a busted flush. They don't really know.. so I don't have to listen to them."


Precisely. At the end of every piece of economic and financial advice you ever get is the tag line "values may go down as well as up". This should be in bold letters at the beginning of the advice. Whether the advice turns out to right or wrong the advisor already has your money. If it turns out to be wrong, you ain't getting it back. I'm not being overly cynical, it's just that economics is largely posited as some sort of science because figures and numbers are seen to be factual, whereas as this economic downturn has demonstrated finance, is more about confidence and emotion.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194601
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In all honesty, I don't understand any of it.

>

> But I'm hoping to get stopped in the street by

> London Tonight so I can get all indignant about 2p

> on wine.


And I'm hoping I'll be right behind *Bob* and will be able to butt in with

"Never mind your 2p on a bottle of wine, pal, wht about the 5p a pint on my facking lager".

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194603
Share on other sites

You know those things *Bob* said about Cameron?.... I agree with them


I expect this 50% tax rate will have people up in arms (I was expecting 45% myself) but if you are earning 150k @ 40% and (say) another 50k at the higher 50% - is that a hardship really? I mean really? Instead of saying "well my brains aren't rewarded enough here, I'm off!" why not take a longer view and say "this country needs extra cash.... I've got plenty cash.... I see a way out of this!"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194652
Share on other sites

All true Sean, but internationally mobile employees can decide where to ply their trade and now they won't be coming here. Another dent to London's finacial centre. It does not even bring in a lot of money, and some high earners will leave, so they won't even get as much as they hoped.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194663
Share on other sites

Sean - around 0.5% of the UK population earn more than ?150K so my thoughts are that this is more gimick than substance - surely much greater revenue generators out there for HMRC.


But as a sacrificial lamb to appease public opinion of "The Rich" it works quite well from a PR point of view.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194667
Share on other sites

Yeah that's the theory I keep being told MM, but It shows a lack of moral fibre if you ask me


Plus, it may have been true in the past but this being a global issue there are far less places to go as each country has it's own revenue mess to sort out


Plus # 2, if these internationally mobile employees are the ones that got us into this mess I won't miss em


plus # 3, if London has to rely less on being a global financial centre, that's fine by me. Even tho it might mean me losing my job


plus #4, it at least starts to bridge the huge divide between lowest and highest paid - one of the most fundamental problems in any society. I understand it may bring in less money, but it's more "correct".

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194668
Share on other sites

Sean - currently we attract the best from abroad partly because of London being a financial centre and also due to some of the tax benefits for non uk nationals we have had in the past. These tax advantages are nearly all gone now. This can only weaken our position. My job is partly based on advising these people. They don't have to live here to provide services here and can easily base themselves elsewhere. Hopefully UK standard of living etc will be enough to keep them here - its this diversity that people like about London.


I don't think there is a moral issue as they are not from here originally so why feel any obligation to remain.


I'm not sure moves to reduce the gap between the well off and the less well of make for a stronger country. And anyway it looks like we will all feel poor soon.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194696
Share on other sites

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lets be honest, this is budget-lite given the way

> we have caned it for the past decade, with no

> thought for the future

>

> Those over 150K will likely have tax minimisation

> schemes onboard anyway


Indeed. Salary alone is a very tax inefficient way to draw income for the self employed when you are taking personal risks to make a living that the employed are not.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194697
Share on other sites



Now, I keep hearing this.... and I can see that Thierry henry is better than Alan Smith - but in finance...how have "the best" let this happen? In short, I don't believe we have the best as it is and anyone who leaves won't be missed, be the indigenous or not


But as an adviser, where would you suggest they go to maximise their income?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194698
Share on other sites

Switzerland, Luxembourg and Ireland are the normal choices.


The UK, and people working here, are I believe not responsible for this sub prime led disaster. We have however suffered from it. Why the US has not had to eat humble pie and beg forgiveness from the rest of the world I know not why.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194732
Share on other sites

You aren't going to advise anyone to leave the UK to go to Ireland surely be to jaysus!!!


I'm not suggesting that UK is solely responsible for the problems, but the UK financial markets were significantly hubristic about it's light-touch regulation (ie basically telling anyone they needed to calm down a bit to "f*** off!") so I think they do shoulder some responsibility. But If I was an American working at a large bank over hear (and if I throw a smartie in any direction from desk I will hit at least several) i wouldn't be looking at many other countries as "a better bet", either from a job-security or a tax efficient alternative. Speaking to the people around me, they plan on staying put

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194733
Share on other sites

Cracking Budget ! - That's another Labour Landslide, what with that and the masterstroke of putting on the conservative MP's and their 2nd jobs in the spotlight , genius. Gordon is a true politician, the Cons will not know where to start and the lib's main election flag shredded in one swift move ! Did he mention anything about putting some money aside for the Nunhead Regen Scheme ?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194772
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Switzerland, Luxembourg and Ireland are the normal

> choices.

>

> The UK, and people working here, are I believe not

> responsible for this sub prime led disaster.


So AIG Mayfair was actually operated from...Timbuktu?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194845
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Switzerland, Luxembourg and Ireland are the normal

> choices.

>

> The UK, and people working here, are I believe not

> responsible for this sub prime led disaster.


So AIG Mayfair was actually operated from...Timbuktu?



I'm sorry I honestly don't know what this means Lou.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6060-budget/page/2/#findComment-194897
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...