Jump to content

Recommended Posts

About 4 shops have been knocked into one just down from the Plough on Lordship Lane. I was told by a man who lives opposite that it's going to be a Tesco Local or similar. There's no official sign or other indicator as to whether this is true, but it does look the right size. (Unless it's going to be another unnecessarily enormous branch of Foxtons, of course)


I reported it back to friend who said he had also heard this rumour, which suggests to me that maybe it's more than a rumour.


Obviously it would mean death for the various Costcutter type shops in the area, but handy for the people who live nearby and don't want to have to get a bus up to FH Sainsburys to get their shopping or down to Somerfield in ED. LL is a very long road, after all!


Anyone heard anytihng official?

Somerfields applied to Southwark Council for an alcohol license for that premise back in Feb. This was due to be heard at committee on the 20th April I believe. There should be a notification soon on whether they were successful. Although I see no legal reason why it would be turned down.
As far as I could understand, Somerfield has been taken over by Co-op but it will take about two years for all the branches to be sold on or transformed into Co-ops. since Somerfield is still a going concern I suppose it's understandable that it can still expand and open new branches. I don't want a national supermarket to open up by the Plough but I'd rather a Somerfield than a Tesco.

nunheadbelle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Tesco have made massive profits, even with

> the credit crunch, so opening more shops seems to

> be on their agenda.

> Someone else said that there was a Tesco opening

> in those new units at the top of Rye Lane.

>

> Nunheadbelle


i also heard Foxtons was closing and we were getting a Sainsbury's Local on LL.


*grows old*

nunheadbelle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > > i also heard Foxtons was closing and we were

> > getting a Sainsbury's Local on LL.

> >

> > *grows old*

>

> Well, this seems pretty certain Co-Operative

> house, new Tesco


I cycled past there last night.


you know what I saw?


Nothing.


Unless my definition of 'moved in' is outdated

I have a feeling the units near the Plough will open up under the name of Co-Operative as opposed to Somerfield, and if this is the case i'm not knocking it. I am pleased to see Tesco starting work on the Rye Lane Tesco, it is a welcome addition and will hopefully attract passing trade from the station of an evening via the lane itself. Maybe if the increased footfall takes place, we will end up with a selfridges as well as H&M and all other shops. Anyone want rehash the simply food agenda? speak now or forever hold your peace!


Louisa.

ClareC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yep, definitely a costcutter, its shown on their

> website! Doesn't say when opening though.

>

> http://www.costcutter.com/storeresult2bpost.php?RE

> CORD_KEY%28storelocpost%29=id&id(storelocpost)=640

> 69


That's the costcutter that's already there(by the busstop), not the new one!

Loads of builders hats with 'tescos' on them on the floor in the unit now :).




lenk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nunheadbelle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > > i also heard Foxtons was closing and we

> were

> > > getting a Sainsbury's Local on LL.

> > >

> > > *grows old*

> >

> > Well, this seems pretty certain Co-Operative

> > house, new Tesco

>

> I cycled past there last night.

>

> you know what I saw?

>

> Nothing.

>

> Unless my definition of 'moved in' is outdated

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loads of builders hats with 'tescos' on them on

> the floor in the unit now :).

>

>

>

> lenk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > nunheadbelle Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > > > i also heard Foxtons was closing and we

> > were

> > > > getting a Sainsbury's Local on LL.

> > > >

> > > > *grows old*

> > >

> > > Well, this seems pretty certain Co-Operative

> > > house, new Tesco

> >

> > I cycled past there last night.

> >

> > you know what I saw?

> >

> > Nothing.

> >

> > Unless my definition of 'moved in' is outdated



??


Tesco don't have their own firm of builders.


Whoever they are they would be subcontracted.


And would wear their own hard-hats. Not Tesco ones.


Are we willing this place into existence?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...