Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I must admit, it took me a over year of living

> near here to go in as I thought it was a comic

> book shop. But it is indeed a proper bookshop,

> and I think very good.


Are you insinuating that comic books are not proper books?

Answer to number four: the market forces mean they're wanted. When people stop going, they'll close up.

Answer to number one: probably they're taking too much time clearing up after the little ones.

Answer to number two: don't care. Complain to management. No point asking us!

Answer to number three: We don't need more chains here. Cheners is fab.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have been beaten up by several forumites on this

> point, and can confirm through my broken teeth and

> split lip that the northern end is the bottom.

> Can also confirm that I'm very sorry and won't do

> it again.


The northern end is the bottom?

How absurd and preposterous!

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Answer to number three: We don't need more chains

> here. Cheners is fab.


Call me shallow but if I have to pay full price for a book I want to do it somewhere a lot less manky-looking.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bollicks, North is up everyone knows that.

>

> Except in the very olden days when East was up.



The East Dulwich Forum. The only place in the known universe where up is down and down is up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dunstans Road  comes under Dulwich Hill SNT- you can get their details on the Met Police website . I know that the Police are often patrolling Dawson Hights. Please contact them,
    • No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? I don’t want people to feel like they need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re on well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you, assuming of course, that they're driving with due care and attention. But yes, if there are lots of people without lights, that should be addressed. I suspect in part, it's the change over in seasons and the fact that people are getting caught out by how early it's getting dark now (obviously no excuse).
    • Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...