Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quids, are you serious?

Anyone without children should just move out, because ED is a "family suburb"?


Foolishly, I thought within a whole postcode there might be room for more than one type of household and I'm really surprised to hear such intolerance from you. I'm childless, but I'd like to stay in your suburb if that's alright.


As for the rest of the debate, pointless and polarised as always when this comes up.

Some parents are considerate and tolerant and some are not and some are mostly considerate and tolerant, but occasionally not.

Some non-parents are considerate and tolerant and some are not and some are considerate and tolerant most of the time, but occasionally not.

Most people would agree that well behaved children are better than badly behaved children and most people recognise that not all children behave well all the time and that's ok.

Generalisations are rubbish.

It's *Bob*'s law all over again.

Kids, the more the merrier. Bring them up with a strong work ethic so they will be contributing taxes to my pension when I'm an old and curmudgeonly git. Some will even go on to be doctors, nusrses and social workers, all of whom I may have need of.

I'm quite prepared for any minor inconvenience when they're growing up, having to walk in the gutter because bugaboos (a sort of pram I believe) are blocking the pavement, having to insert earplugs in certain pubs and not laughing when one them slips on his little arse.

So carry on breeding and you don't need to stop at two or even three, have as many as you like.

Shag on good people.

Oh come on Anna? D'you think I meant that? ...you with 3 and all ;-)?


I just think it's a bit weird how often this 'kids', brats, superior 'acting' parents stuff is on the Forum in an area that is stocked to the gills with family housing and was originally built as such - as shown in that interesting historical link Lousia posted (there's an irony). I have never seen a thread about horrible, noisy, selfish childless people (of which there are legion TOO) for example. I'd hate a EDF drinks and East Dulwich without the childless lot, please stay!


My comment about Hoxton was aimed at Lenk specifically who has said he is a 'cardy carrying kidhater' in which case I'm surprised he lives in this area which has always been 'family'.

Do I live in the same place as all of you? Yes I see children around. This is normal. Considering that every person was once a child I am sometimes surprised that one doesn?t see more children around.


Funnily enough I never feel overrun by them any more than I would by the 20 somethings without kids or the elderly.


When I go out it seems full of all sorts of people some of them are in families. Again am I wrong in thinking this is a normal thing? A couple have children and they go about as a family unit. It is certainly what I intend on doing when I reproduce. Or am I misled and is it done in some other way?


I would like to take this opportunity to call you all idiots for even having this idiotic debate. Not that I can really bring myself to read much of it but I?ve got a feeling that it probably contains references to butchers, stupid assumptions about perambulators, accusations of class prejudice and a whole lot more idiocy about bollicks. (Has it got onto homophobia, racism, homeopathy or dogs yet?)


Take a few doses of, get the fuck over it, and hopefully you should feel better in the morning.



Ps. Any exception taken to my callous generalisations or pointing out the hypocrisy of me contributing to something, the contributing to which I have just rubbished, will be treated in the manner of a five year old with it?s fingers in its ears.

So - to recap - the essence of this thoroughly enlightening thread is: I don't like badly behaved children. Dur.


However, if you think East Dulwich is full of badly behaved children, then you're either an idiot, or you don't actually know what badly behaved children are. Either that, or you have two definitions for badly behaved children, based on the social and economic means of their parents. In which case, you're in idiot.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Ps. Any exception taken to my callous

> generalisations or pointing out the hypocrisy of

> me contributing to something, the contributing to

> which I have just rubbished, will be treated in

> the manner of a five year old with it?s fingers in

> its ears.


Actually Brendan this thread has now taken a swerve and all I'm concerned about is whether you'll be selling tickets for the sight of you 'reproducing'.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My comment about Hoxton was aimed at Lenk

> specifically who has said he is a 'cardy carrying

> kidhater' in which case I'm surprised he lives in

> this area which has always been 'family'.


Most of us would live somewhere else if we could afford it...

I liked Brendan's post the best (again)


Whenever I see another whinging post I think, as Brendan put it "Do I live in the same place as all of you?"



EDITED: Which isn't to say I'm some sort of Stepford clone thinking everything is all cushty, sorted etc. But in the greater scheme of things most people who have the time to post on here and live in the area are living on the sunny side of the global mountain

Kids are fine , be they grilled , stewed or BBQ'd, they are fine by me


after all a bit of noise and a buggy or 2 is a small price to pay when sitting in a coffee shop watching the yummy mummies go by.


Also guys , kids are like little puppies , they help you meet the fairer sex. (being an uncle, rather than a father is the best one here)


As for a queue outside the butchers , shows its popular and has good turnover of product so also works for me


ok , nuff said

I must say my gay vegetarian but not yet publicly out of the closet dog friend, who is being treated for allergies to children & prams & butcher shop queues by an alternative Buddist/Catholic practitioner is /will be very offend by many of the nasty comments on this thread, please consider this when posting



Though he still likes a nice "Bone in his bed" apparently



W**F



*Goes back to society section of the Guardian *

I had to walk out of Nero Coffee twice yesterday as I it was stuffed with mums with 4x4 bugs and I couldn't get a seat.


BTW: Husbands/boyfriends of said mums - are you all aware what your 'wimin' are doing all day? Who cleans the house and makes supper ffs?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...