Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In 35 years I think I have been to the New Hamlet

> Inn / Vale / Cherry Tree 4 or 5 times.

>

> Never seen the need to pass another pub to get

> there. Can't ever see things changing.




Good thing we're not all like you then, Foxy, eh?! :))

Why is that then Sue.

Over the years I've been a regular in the Plough where I worked.

A regular in the old Uplands , the Palmy. The Foresters / Bishop

And now the EDT.

I tend to stick with one pub and move on from time to time when things change.

Like partners. Never felt the need for more than one at a time.


Foxy

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How's The Lordship doing in the miasma of ED pubs?


Well 200+ people on opening night (free beer)

Been back a few times since and there were 4 or 5 people in at 9.30pm

And a few dining. 6-8

So I I have tried. Friendly barman . Just the one.


?5.40 for Peroni


Not been back for a few weeks.


Foxy

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is that then Sue.


> Over the years I've been a regular in the Plough

> where I worked.

> A regular in the old Uplands , the Palmy. The

> Foresters / Bishop

> And now the EDT.

> I tend to stick with one pub and move on from time

> to time when things change.

> Like partners. Never felt the need for more than

> one at a time.

>

> Foxy



Because if we were all like you, no new place would ever have any customers :)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is that then Sue.

> Over the years I've been a regular in the Plough

> where I worked.

> A regular in the old Uplands , the Palmy. The

> Foresters / Bishop

> And now the EDT.

> I tend to stick with one pub and move on from time

> to time when things change.

> Like partners. Never felt the need for more than

> one at a time.

>

> Foxy


ALways preferred to have a set of pub crawls to reflect my mood :)

Sue Wrote:

> Because if we were all like you, no new place

> would ever have any customers :)


Nonesense.. They will have plenty of customers..

People who live nearer. People who the new facilities suits them. I.E. Sports / Food/ Garden / childrens area.

Passing trade.


It is not compulsary to visit every new Bar, Pub, Cafe, Restaurant, Shop.

Why do people insist we all need to support ALL local businesses. ? Thats not practical.


I do not have the resourses to constantly Eat and Drink out in ED or indeed anywhere else for that matter.

I do my fair share of Eating and Drinking out.


Foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And one where you can get a good pint for under

> ?4. Or certainly no more than ?4.

>

> I'm still getting over my brief visit to The

> Palmerston last Sunday evening. If I am buying 2

> pints, I want pretty much ?2 back from a tenner,

> not 20p.

>

> And my pint (Meantime) wasn't very nice either.


I was in Bristol the weekend before last and couldn't believe how cheap drinks were compared to London.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Those crazy young kids who like to go to more

> than

> > one pub - sometimes on THE SAME NIGHT!!

>

>

> :)) :)) :))


I seldom drink more than 2 pints. Sometimes just the one.

I gave up drinking myself into a coma many years ago.


foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's just that most of us wouldn't bother to tell

> the world that we won't be visiting a place foxy.

> Most of us would just stay quiet.


There are many examples in several threads where people have said they don't use / wouldn't use a place.


The Pussey Liquor thread is a good example. With some prominent users expressing such a view.


I have not seen any such judgement as above passed to those people.

You just cannot drop the knock Foxy thing can you. ?


Its tiresome..


DF

I read Sue's response as trying to be friendly (the smiley emoticon gave me this impression) and I didn't read it as an attack of you Foxy, but more as a comment that it is good to have a mix of people. Those who are loyal to their locals and those that try the new openings, move about, or like different things on different days.


Local businesses need both of these types of people to grow, thrive and hopefully survive.


It's a shame you feel like it was an attack on you (I understand why you might, I've seen plenty of unwaranted negativity towards you on the Forum) but in this case I do think you have overblown the comment to feel unfairly judged.


Sue, If I am misrepresenting your intentions then I am happy to stand corrected. Dulwich Fox, keep your head high and do what you do, drink where you want, and eat where you want. Try not to read everything as a 'knock' most of us appreciate your input.

Baggs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I read Sue's response as trying to be friendly

> (the smiley emoticon gave me this impression) ...........

> Sue, If I am misrepresenting your intentions then

> I am happy to stand corrected.



This was the post in question:



DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In 35 years I think I have been to the New Hamlet

> Inn / Vale / Cherry Tree 4 or 5 times.

>

> Never seen the need to pass another pub to get

> there. Can't ever see things changing.


(and I wrote)



Good thing we're not all like you then, Foxy, eh?! :))




It was indeed intended to be a light-hearted comment, however I do sometimes find the Fox's life view as posted on here and as exemplified by that particular post wears me down :(



Sorry Fox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's just that most of us wouldn't bother to

> tell

> > the world that we won't be visiting a place

> foxy.

> > Most of us would just stay quiet.

>

> There are many examples in several threads where

> people have said they don't use / wouldn't use a

> place.

>

> The Pussey Liquor thread is a good example. With

> some prominent users expressing such a view.

>

> I have not seen any such judgement as above passed

> to those people.

> You just cannot drop the knock Foxy thing can you.

> ?

>

> Its tiresome..

>

> DF



With Pussey Liquor people are saying it's a childish and insulting name, and as such they won't be going there.


You're not saying anything like that, you are saying you like other pubs so probably won't bother going the extra distance to the cherry tree (or whatever it will be called).


They are very different things. There are loads of places I will probably never go to simply because I can't be bothered or am not interested. As such, I don't post on threads about them.


You just cannot drop the victim complex thing can you. ?


It's tiresome.

"I seldom drink more than 2 pints. Sometimes just the one"


I didn't think you went to pub quiz nights Foxy?



-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jeremy Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Those crazy young kids who like to go to more

> > than

> > > one pub - sometimes on THE SAME NIGHT!!

> >

> >

> > :)) :)) :))

>

> I seldom drink more than 2 pints. Sometimes just

> the one.

> I gave up drinking myself into a coma many years

> ago.

>

> foxy

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • People don’t go out of their way to leave  their valuables out on the porch  they are most likely at work when a delivery company decides on their behalf to just leave it on the doorstep.  They are the problem not “people being surprised when their items disappear” 
    • Yes, Direct Line automatically rejected it when I tried to get a quote. Insurers really are a nightmare, and they have a huge psychological impact on buyers. When you’re about to put £1m into a pile of bricks, and the insurance companies either refuse to insure it or quote an outrageous premium, of course it’s going to scare anyone. I’m not actually worried about subsidence in this house main building , but the bay window has definitely been affected by that tree, and the council won’t remove it. When the movement continues, rebuilding the bay window would cost at least £40k. The seller will never admit this, but there are already houses on that street where the bay windows have had to be rebuilt. If not East Dulwich, I’m now looking towards the west. There are a lot of subsidence issues with properties in Forest Hill, and Bromley and West Wickham aren’t really for me. I’m not interested in any part of Dulwich except ED, ND and Dulwich Village — and obviously ED offers the best value.
    • Not sure what you are looking for, but my suggestion would be around Forest Hill, certain parts of Bromley and West Wickham  Telegraph Hill. All nice areas- safe and you get more for your money. Really depends on how you travel, or don’t.. as inn needing good transport links to City. Like I said, feel free to pm me.. abit difficult to advise if not sure what you are after, but pretty sure not a flat!  oh, West Dulwich and Herne Hill area.  
    • I honestly can’t believe how TW operates. Just like the councils and UK Power Networks — what kind of people are they? I’ve cried my way through some projects because I had to liaise with these departments. No wonder I feel like running away every time their names come up. I first started thinking about walking away when I noticed the main water issue with TW (which would delay the project), the potential drainage problem, and the higher insurance claims than what I was initially told, plus the ongoing issues. Subsidences can be very different,  my current house definitely had subsidence back in 50 years ago, but the previous owner never made any claims, and there has never been a drainage issue or damp issue. All of this has increased my concern about the project time and resale value. I don’t want this to turn into a liability instead of an asset.  I’m now also looking at properties in Clapham common, same price, a lot bigger
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...