Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I suffer from the occasional monster lash, which is most often spotted by Mrs Doctor Proctor. Her solution is to wait until I'm half asleep (perhaps dozing on the couch), and then she goes in with the pointy tweezers.


If I do spot the blighter first, I leave it to grow, just to see how long it can get before it is harvested.

If I leave mine in their natural state, they join in the middle into the aforementioned monobrow. Therefore a little plucking is essential. I stop short of fashioning them into a delicate arch.


daizie - plucking nostril hair is OK? No it is not! I tried it once, it was one of the most painful things I have ever experienced. Nostril hairs should be trimmed. Again, I am not a vain man, but nobody likes a fellow with thick hairs like insect legs sprouting from his nose.

my goodness i never knew barbers sometimes trim nose and ear hair - i think those places are a bit personal. How do they approach such subjects? When I went to the dentist last time I was told I was a prime candidate for teeth whitening, with such good quality teeth (that obviously aren't white enough!) Do they do it in a similar fashion? What would you like today sir, short back and sides and I see you have such brilliant excess hair sprouting from various orifices, you are a prime candidate for an orifice trim.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...