Jump to content

ED Picturehouse. Elitist*. (Louisa's lounged response)


Recommended Posts

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> View only RD.. imagine the pain this brings



I know, which kinda makes a mockery of the whole ''what did I do?!'' schtick*...



*This weeks new word. Next week - pontification...slight pause after pon for added effect

Earlier I was going to say that I thought foxy was a good egg, but could be painfully negative.


Then I read



DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> It's not that I don't buy into the "zeitgeist"

> (spirit of the age or spirit of the time) of newly

> affluent East Dulwich.

>

> I've had my time. it now time for others to have

> their time.

>

> But they need to leave just a little space.

> All this "if you don't like it. you know where

> the door is." attitude is bad.

>




I actually agree with foxy 100% on the above.


And this is why at times O think Louisa can't help herself, because with some posters there is a certain level of smugness. I also find it personally insulting when people suggest that before the year 2000 when it was miraculously saved, ED was a total dump. It bloody well wasn't!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> I actually agree with foxy 100% on the above.

>

> And this is why at times O think Louisa can't help

> herself, because with some posters there is a

> certain level of smugness. I also find it

> personally insulting when people suggest that

> before the year 2000 when it was miraculously

> saved, ED was a total dump. It bloody well wasn't!


This sums it up perfectly for me. Well done Otta.


That smug attitude you refer to, mostly from a group of people in the main section, needs to be put in its place freon time to time. The people who hunted me down and requested my removal from the forum are those very people.


I have my memories of this place, and it wasn't a dump before you lot arrived, I grew up here and lived and loved here. I don't need to be patronised by a few people about what I can and can't say about East Dulwich. The area wasn't saved when you moved here, it had a thriving community even if the high street wasn't to your liking.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've been told if you're rude in the lounge you

> get banished to the dark lands full of dragons and

> shape shifters (aka the West Dulwich Forum).

>

> Louisa.


Blimey. That really is banishment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
    • Apparently a tourist tax was Raynor's idea, but Reeves has put the kibosh on it because of the push-back she'll get from businesses
    • But a larger number, in a more hotly contested election, didn't. It is an anomaly that Starmer won a landslide in seats with a turnout for Labour which would have shamed Labour leaders in all the 21st and much of the post war 20th century.
    • I was not suggesting anything else!   I'm not sure how you interpret what I said  as "irrelevant"? I was responding to a post saying that Corbyn was "unelectable". My point was that a  large number  of the electorate  voted for him!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...